THE APPLICATION OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ON SCAR SEGMENTATION IN CARDIAC MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW

Roslan Nurul Ashikin, Setiawan Agung Nugroho, Norzan Muhammad Ammar, Jasmin Nur Hayati
{"title":"THE APPLICATION OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ON SCAR SEGMENTATION IN CARDIAC MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW","authors":"Roslan Nurul Ashikin, Setiawan Agung Nugroho, Norzan Muhammad Ammar, Jasmin Nur Hayati","doi":"10.1016/j.jmir.2023.06.117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE We aimed to assess the application of Artificial Intelligence (AI) methodologies for scar segmentation in cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging and its performance evaluation. MATERIALS & METHODS Following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, a systematic search of PubMed and Science Direct was undertaken from 2012 to 2022 to search for full-text publications that implemented AI methods on scar segmentation in CMR in patients with cardiovascular diseases. RESULTS A total of 21 articles out of 475 articles were selected for the final review. Supervised deep learning and unsupervised machine learning were implemented in 16 (76.2%) and 5 (23.8%) articles respectively, favouring learning methods. Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) value was used as measures of the performance of AI methods in 19 articles. Supervised and unsupervised learning models had similar DSC compared to manual segmentation with a score of 0.74, 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.67, 0.81] vs 0.71, 95% CI [0.63, 0.79], P = 0.35). The application of AI has been advanced with the emerging of sophisticated algorithms allowing for quantification of border zone and microvascular obstruction regions. The performance of AI method is highly depending on the network architecture, training strategies, and data set used for training. CONCLUSION The presence of AI methods in scar segmentation demonstrated high feasibility with good performance evaluation for quantifying myocardial scar. This study can have a huge impact on clinicians in health care by improving their experiences with scar segmentation and enhancing clinically validated application of AI in CMR imaging. We aimed to assess the application of Artificial Intelligence (AI) methodologies for scar segmentation in cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging and its performance evaluation. Following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, a systematic search of PubMed and Science Direct was undertaken from 2012 to 2022 to search for full-text publications that implemented AI methods on scar segmentation in CMR in patients with cardiovascular diseases. A total of 21 articles out of 475 articles were selected for the final review. Supervised deep learning and unsupervised machine learning were implemented in 16 (76.2%) and 5 (23.8%) articles respectively, favouring learning methods. Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) value was used as measures of the performance of AI methods in 19 articles. Supervised and unsupervised learning models had similar DSC compared to manual segmentation with a score of 0.74, 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.67, 0.81] vs 0.71, 95% CI [0.63, 0.79], P = 0.35). The application of AI has been advanced with the emerging of sophisticated algorithms allowing for quantification of border zone and microvascular obstruction regions. The performance of AI method is highly depending on the network architecture, training strategies, and data set used for training. The presence of AI methods in scar segmentation demonstrated high feasibility with good performance evaluation for quantifying myocardial scar. This study can have a huge impact on clinicians in health care by improving their experiences with scar segmentation and enhancing clinically validated application of AI in CMR imaging.","PeriodicalId":94092,"journal":{"name":"Journal of medical imaging and radiation sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of medical imaging and radiation sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmir.2023.06.117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVE We aimed to assess the application of Artificial Intelligence (AI) methodologies for scar segmentation in cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging and its performance evaluation. MATERIALS & METHODS Following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, a systematic search of PubMed and Science Direct was undertaken from 2012 to 2022 to search for full-text publications that implemented AI methods on scar segmentation in CMR in patients with cardiovascular diseases. RESULTS A total of 21 articles out of 475 articles were selected for the final review. Supervised deep learning and unsupervised machine learning were implemented in 16 (76.2%) and 5 (23.8%) articles respectively, favouring learning methods. Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) value was used as measures of the performance of AI methods in 19 articles. Supervised and unsupervised learning models had similar DSC compared to manual segmentation with a score of 0.74, 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.67, 0.81] vs 0.71, 95% CI [0.63, 0.79], P = 0.35). The application of AI has been advanced with the emerging of sophisticated algorithms allowing for quantification of border zone and microvascular obstruction regions. The performance of AI method is highly depending on the network architecture, training strategies, and data set used for training. CONCLUSION The presence of AI methods in scar segmentation demonstrated high feasibility with good performance evaluation for quantifying myocardial scar. This study can have a huge impact on clinicians in health care by improving their experiences with scar segmentation and enhancing clinically validated application of AI in CMR imaging. We aimed to assess the application of Artificial Intelligence (AI) methodologies for scar segmentation in cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging and its performance evaluation. Following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, a systematic search of PubMed and Science Direct was undertaken from 2012 to 2022 to search for full-text publications that implemented AI methods on scar segmentation in CMR in patients with cardiovascular diseases. A total of 21 articles out of 475 articles were selected for the final review. Supervised deep learning and unsupervised machine learning were implemented in 16 (76.2%) and 5 (23.8%) articles respectively, favouring learning methods. Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) value was used as measures of the performance of AI methods in 19 articles. Supervised and unsupervised learning models had similar DSC compared to manual segmentation with a score of 0.74, 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.67, 0.81] vs 0.71, 95% CI [0.63, 0.79], P = 0.35). The application of AI has been advanced with the emerging of sophisticated algorithms allowing for quantification of border zone and microvascular obstruction regions. The performance of AI method is highly depending on the network architecture, training strategies, and data set used for training. The presence of AI methods in scar segmentation demonstrated high feasibility with good performance evaluation for quantifying myocardial scar. This study can have a huge impact on clinicians in health care by improving their experiences with scar segmentation and enhancing clinically validated application of AI in CMR imaging.
人工智能在心脏磁共振成像瘢痕分割中的应用:系统的文献综述
目的探讨人工智能(AI)方法在心脏磁共振(CMR)成像中疤痕分割的应用及其性能评价。材料和方法遵循PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目)指南,在2012年至2022年期间对PubMed和Science Direct进行了系统搜索,以搜索在心血管疾病患者的CMR中应用AI方法进行疤痕分割的全文出版物。结果475篇文献中,共有21篇入选终审稿。有监督深度学习和无监督机器学习分别在16篇(76.2%)和5篇(23.8%)文章中实现,有利于学习方法。在19篇文章中,采用骰子相似系数(DSC)值作为人工智能方法性能的度量。与人工分割相比,有监督学习和无监督学习模型的DSC相似,得分为0.74,95%置信区间(CI) [0.67, 0.81] vs 0.71, 95% CI [0.63, 0.79], P = 0.35)。随着复杂算法的出现,人工智能的应用已经取得了进展,可以对边界区和微血管阻塞区域进行量化。人工智能方法的性能高度依赖于网络架构、训练策略和用于训练的数据集。结论人工智能方法在瘢痕分割中应用于心肌瘢痕定量具有较高的可行性和良好的性能评价。这项研究可以通过改善他们在疤痕分割方面的经验和加强人工智能在CMR成像中的临床验证应用,对医疗保健临床医生产生巨大影响。我们旨在评估人工智能(AI)方法在心脏磁共振(CMR)成像中疤痕分割的应用及其性能评估。遵循PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目)指南,从2012年到2022年,对PubMed和Science Direct进行了系统搜索,以搜索在心血管疾病患者的CMR中应用AI方法进行疤痕分割的全文出版物。从475篇文章中选出21篇文章进行最终审查。有监督深度学习和无监督机器学习分别在16篇(76.2%)和5篇(23.8%)文章中实现,有利于学习方法。在19篇文章中,采用骰子相似系数(DSC)值作为人工智能方法性能的度量。与人工分割相比,有监督学习和无监督学习模型的DSC相似,得分为0.74,95%置信区间(CI) [0.67, 0.81] vs 0.71, 95% CI [0.63, 0.79], P = 0.35)。随着复杂算法的出现,人工智能的应用已经取得了进展,可以对边界区和微血管阻塞区域进行量化。人工智能方法的性能高度依赖于网络架构、训练策略和用于训练的数据集。人工智能方法在疤痕分割中的应用,对心肌疤痕量化具有较高的可行性和良好的性能评价。这项研究可以通过改善他们在疤痕分割方面的经验和加强人工智能在CMR成像中的临床验证应用,对医疗保健临床医生产生巨大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信