{"title":"Juridical-Philosophical Study of Wonosadi Forest Conflict Resolution Model with a Gender Perspective Based on Local Wisdom","authors":"Caritas Woro Murdiati Runggandini, Bernadus Wibowo Suliantoro","doi":"10.55324/josr.v2i11.1534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A forest is a place where various living things depend. The interests of one creature sometimes clash with the interests of other creatures, causing conflict. The women of Beji Village, Ngawen District, have wisdom in managing forest use conflicts wisely. This study aims to identify, inventory, and criticize the Wonosadi forest utilization conflict resolution model that can provide welfare for all parties. This research seeks to combine legal research with philosophical research. Empirical legal research is carried out by uncovering forest management phenomena so that they can be sustainable and provide welfare for various parties. Philosophical research aims to reveal perspectives, mindsets, and philosophical foundations developed by the people of Beji village, especially their women, in resolving conflicts wisely. The results of the study found that the Beji village community developed a mindset based on an ontological basis that views the forest as not just a collection of trees in the form of mere physical objects, but rather spiritual values. The epistemological basis for understanding the forest is not just using ratios, but at the same time using feelings. Understanding does not aim to master or exploit but to love and admire. The values that form the basis of axiology encourage the perspective of Beji village women in resolving conflicts wisely in the form of values of respect for fellow beings, compassion, caring, cosmic solidarity, and justice. This philosophical foundation is used as a source of material and a source of value for constructing and resolving conflicts based on living law in society (living law).","PeriodicalId":38172,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Research and Policy","volume":"70 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social Research and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55324/josr.v2i11.1534","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
A forest is a place where various living things depend. The interests of one creature sometimes clash with the interests of other creatures, causing conflict. The women of Beji Village, Ngawen District, have wisdom in managing forest use conflicts wisely. This study aims to identify, inventory, and criticize the Wonosadi forest utilization conflict resolution model that can provide welfare for all parties. This research seeks to combine legal research with philosophical research. Empirical legal research is carried out by uncovering forest management phenomena so that they can be sustainable and provide welfare for various parties. Philosophical research aims to reveal perspectives, mindsets, and philosophical foundations developed by the people of Beji village, especially their women, in resolving conflicts wisely. The results of the study found that the Beji village community developed a mindset based on an ontological basis that views the forest as not just a collection of trees in the form of mere physical objects, but rather spiritual values. The epistemological basis for understanding the forest is not just using ratios, but at the same time using feelings. Understanding does not aim to master or exploit but to love and admire. The values that form the basis of axiology encourage the perspective of Beji village women in resolving conflicts wisely in the form of values of respect for fellow beings, compassion, caring, cosmic solidarity, and justice. This philosophical foundation is used as a source of material and a source of value for constructing and resolving conflicts based on living law in society (living law).
期刊介绍:
Welfare states have made well-being one of the main focuses of public policies. Social policies entail, however, complicated, and sometimes almost insurmountable, issues of prioritization, measurement, problem evaluation or strategic and technical decision making concerning aim-setting or finding the most adequate means to ends. Given the pressures to effectiveness it is no wonder that the last several decades have witnessed the imposition of research-based social policies as standard as well as the development of policy-oriented research methodologies. Legitimate social policies are, in this context, more and more dependent on the accurate use of diagnostic methods, of sophisticated program evaluation approaches, of benchmarking and so on. Inspired by this acute interest, our journal aims to host primarily articles based on policy research and methodological approaches of policy topics. Our journal is open to sociologically informed contributions from anthropologists, psychologists, statisticians, economists, historians and political scientists. General theoretical papers are also welcomed if do not deviate from the interests stated above. The editors also welcome reviews of books that are relevant to the topics covered in the journal.