Juridical-Philosophical Study of Wonosadi Forest Conflict Resolution Model with a Gender Perspective Based on Local Wisdom

Q4 Social Sciences
Caritas Woro Murdiati Runggandini, Bernadus Wibowo Suliantoro
{"title":"Juridical-Philosophical Study of Wonosadi Forest Conflict Resolution Model with a Gender Perspective Based on Local Wisdom","authors":"Caritas Woro Murdiati Runggandini, Bernadus Wibowo Suliantoro","doi":"10.55324/josr.v2i11.1534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A forest is a place where various living things depend. The interests of one creature sometimes clash with the interests of other creatures, causing conflict. The women of Beji Village, Ngawen District, have wisdom in managing forest use conflicts wisely. This study aims to identify, inventory, and criticize the Wonosadi forest utilization conflict resolution model that can provide welfare for all parties. This research seeks to combine legal research with philosophical research. Empirical legal research is carried out by uncovering forest management phenomena so that they can be sustainable and provide welfare for various parties. Philosophical research aims to reveal perspectives, mindsets, and philosophical foundations developed by the people of Beji village, especially their women, in resolving conflicts wisely. The results of the study found that the Beji village community developed a mindset based on an ontological basis that views the forest as not just a collection of trees in the form of mere physical objects, but rather spiritual values. The epistemological basis for understanding the forest is not just using ratios, but at the same time using feelings. Understanding does not aim to master or exploit but to love and admire. The values that form the basis of axiology encourage the perspective of Beji village women in resolving conflicts wisely in the form of values of respect for fellow beings, compassion, caring, cosmic solidarity, and justice. This philosophical foundation is used as a source of material and a source of value for constructing and resolving conflicts based on living law in society (living law).","PeriodicalId":38172,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Research and Policy","volume":"70 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social Research and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55324/josr.v2i11.1534","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A forest is a place where various living things depend. The interests of one creature sometimes clash with the interests of other creatures, causing conflict. The women of Beji Village, Ngawen District, have wisdom in managing forest use conflicts wisely. This study aims to identify, inventory, and criticize the Wonosadi forest utilization conflict resolution model that can provide welfare for all parties. This research seeks to combine legal research with philosophical research. Empirical legal research is carried out by uncovering forest management phenomena so that they can be sustainable and provide welfare for various parties. Philosophical research aims to reveal perspectives, mindsets, and philosophical foundations developed by the people of Beji village, especially their women, in resolving conflicts wisely. The results of the study found that the Beji village community developed a mindset based on an ontological basis that views the forest as not just a collection of trees in the form of mere physical objects, but rather spiritual values. The epistemological basis for understanding the forest is not just using ratios, but at the same time using feelings. Understanding does not aim to master or exploit but to love and admire. The values that form the basis of axiology encourage the perspective of Beji village women in resolving conflicts wisely in the form of values of respect for fellow beings, compassion, caring, cosmic solidarity, and justice. This philosophical foundation is used as a source of material and a source of value for constructing and resolving conflicts based on living law in society (living law).
基于地方智慧的性别视角下沃萨萨迪森林冲突解决模式的法哲学研究
森林是各种生物赖以生存的地方。一种生物的利益有时会与其他生物的利益发生冲突,从而引起冲突。恩加文地区贝集村的妇女们在明智地处理森林使用冲突方面具有智慧。本研究旨在识别、清查并批判能为各方提供福利的沃萨萨迪森林利用冲突解决模式。本研究力求将法学研究与哲学研究相结合。实证法律研究是通过揭示森林经营现象,使其具有可持续性,并为各方提供福利。哲学研究旨在揭示贝集村人民,特别是他们的妇女在明智地解决冲突时所形成的观点、思维方式和哲学基础。研究结果发现,贝集村社区形成了一种基于本体论基础的思维方式,认为森林不仅仅是物质形式的树木集合,而且具有精神价值。理解森林的认识论基础不仅仅是使用比率,同时也使用感觉。理解的目的不是征服或剥削,而是去爱和欣赏。构成价值论基础的价值观,鼓励了北集村妇女以尊重同胞、同情、关怀、宇宙团结、正义等价值观的形式,明智地解决冲突。这一哲学基础被用作构建和解决基于社会生活法则(生活法则)的冲突的材料来源和价值来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Social Research and Policy
Journal of Social Research and Policy Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Welfare states have made well-being one of the main focuses of public policies. Social policies entail, however, complicated, and sometimes almost insurmountable, issues of prioritization, measurement, problem evaluation or strategic and technical decision making concerning aim-setting or finding the most adequate means to ends. Given the pressures to effectiveness it is no wonder that the last several decades have witnessed the imposition of research-based social policies as standard as well as the development of policy-oriented research methodologies. Legitimate social policies are, in this context, more and more dependent on the accurate use of diagnostic methods, of sophisticated program evaluation approaches, of benchmarking and so on. Inspired by this acute interest, our journal aims to host primarily articles based on policy research and methodological approaches of policy topics. Our journal is open to sociologically informed contributions from anthropologists, psychologists, statisticians, economists, historians and political scientists. General theoretical papers are also welcomed if do not deviate from the interests stated above. The editors also welcome reviews of books that are relevant to the topics covered in the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信