Res nulla loquitur

Sora Han
{"title":"Res nulla loquitur","authors":"Sora Han","doi":"10.1080/0740770x.2023.2261712","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractThe concept of res nulla loquitur, the no-thing speaks, is a reformulation of the rule of evidence, res ipsa loquitur, the thing speaks for itself. It is drawn from a careful examination of the recorded arrest of Sandra Bland in 2015, and the evidence collected in Texas’s subsequent investigation of her death while in custody. Engaging with what remains of Sandra Bland’s speech performatively by “listening while you look” (Moten), the article offers a critical reading of the rhetoric of self-evident truth associated with Fourth Amendment jurisprudence on lethal arrest and more recent audio-visual evidence of police use of lethal force against black citizens. To emphasize the sonic dimension of the terrain of struggle with the violence of the word of law, each section is accompanied by sound loops the author created from evidence used by artist, lauren woods, in her exhibit, American Monument (2020). These sounds loops can be accessed at resnullaloquitur.com.KEYWORDS: Lethal use of force; nonperformanceevidencesound studiesafropessimismspeech actspolice violencelawabolitionfourth amendmentres ipsa loquitur Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 I use the term, aesthetic, throughout this article in the broad sense of the experience and perception of qualities associated in Western philosophical discourse with art, including beauty, creativity, taste and style. At the same time, my use of the term unsettles the ideological presupposition that qualities typically associated with law, such as rationality, morality and political power, are not aesthetic. So my use of the term encompasses my approach to law and art as each other’s other, which is also to say that artistic and legal judgement share a limit where violence and ethics bear the possibility of unprecedented forms and modes of thought and regard. It is an interventionist term that joins many others' development of the concept, including, for example, Rizvana Bradley and Denise Ferreira da Silva, “Four Theses on Aesthetics” (Citation2021).","PeriodicalId":231321,"journal":{"name":"Women & Performance: a journal of feminist theory","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women & Performance: a journal of feminist theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0740770x.2023.2261712","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AbstractThe concept of res nulla loquitur, the no-thing speaks, is a reformulation of the rule of evidence, res ipsa loquitur, the thing speaks for itself. It is drawn from a careful examination of the recorded arrest of Sandra Bland in 2015, and the evidence collected in Texas’s subsequent investigation of her death while in custody. Engaging with what remains of Sandra Bland’s speech performatively by “listening while you look” (Moten), the article offers a critical reading of the rhetoric of self-evident truth associated with Fourth Amendment jurisprudence on lethal arrest and more recent audio-visual evidence of police use of lethal force against black citizens. To emphasize the sonic dimension of the terrain of struggle with the violence of the word of law, each section is accompanied by sound loops the author created from evidence used by artist, lauren woods, in her exhibit, American Monument (2020). These sounds loops can be accessed at resnullaloquitur.com.KEYWORDS: Lethal use of force; nonperformanceevidencesound studiesafropessimismspeech actspolice violencelawabolitionfourth amendmentres ipsa loquitur Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 I use the term, aesthetic, throughout this article in the broad sense of the experience and perception of qualities associated in Western philosophical discourse with art, including beauty, creativity, taste and style. At the same time, my use of the term unsettles the ideological presupposition that qualities typically associated with law, such as rationality, morality and political power, are not aesthetic. So my use of the term encompasses my approach to law and art as each other’s other, which is also to say that artistic and legal judgement share a limit where violence and ethics bear the possibility of unprecedented forms and modes of thought and regard. It is an interventionist term that joins many others' development of the concept, including, for example, Rizvana Bradley and Denise Ferreira da Silva, “Four Theses on Aesthetics” (Citation2021).
无法律效力
摘要物无言的概念是对证据规则“物无言”的重新表述。这是根据对2015年桑德拉·布兰德被捕记录的仔细审查,以及德克萨斯州随后对她在拘留期间死亡的调查中收集的证据得出的。这篇文章通过“边听边看”(Moten)的方式,对桑德拉·布兰德(Sandra Bland)演讲的残余部分进行了表演,对与第四修正案关于致命逮捕的判例和最近警察对黑人公民使用致命武力的视听证据有关的不言而喻的真理的修辞进行了批判性解读。为了强调与法律之词的暴力斗争的声音维度,每个部分都伴随着作者根据艺术家劳伦·伍兹在她的展览《美国纪念碑》(2020)中使用的证据创建的声音循环。这些声音循环可以在resnullaloquitur.com上获得。关键词:致命使用武力;不表现证据可靠的研究悲观主义言论行为警察暴力废除第四修正案公开声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。注1:在本文中,我使用“美学”一词,泛指西方哲学话语中与艺术相关的品质的体验和感知,包括美、创造力、品味和风格。与此同时,我对这个术语的使用动摇了一种意识形态的预设,即通常与法律相关的品质,如理性、道德和政治权力,不是审美的。因此,我对这个术语的使用包含了我对法律和艺术的看法,因为它们彼此是彼此的,这也就是说,艺术和法律的判断有一个界限,在这个界限里,暴力和道德承担着前所未有的思想形式和模式的可能性。这是一个干涉主义的术语,加入了许多其他概念的发展,例如,包括Rizvana Bradley和Denise Ferreira da Silva的“美学四篇论文”(Citation2021)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书