Comparison of sub-grid drag laws for modeling fluidized beds with the coarse grain DEM–CFD approach

IF 2.8 3区 工程技术 Q1 MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Janna Grabowski, Nico Jurtz, Viktor Brandt, Harald Kruggel-Emden, Matthias Kraume
{"title":"Comparison of sub-grid drag laws for modeling fluidized beds with the coarse grain DEM–CFD approach","authors":"Janna Grabowski,&nbsp;Nico Jurtz,&nbsp;Viktor Brandt,&nbsp;Harald Kruggel-Emden,&nbsp;Matthias Kraume","doi":"10.1007/s40571-023-00671-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Fluidized particulate systems can be well described by coupling the discrete element method (DEM) with computational fluid dynamics (CFD). However, the simulations are computationally very demanding. The computational demand is drastically reduced by applying the coarse grain (CG) approach, where several particles are summarized into larger grains. Scaling rules are applied to the dominant forces to obtain precise solutions. However, with growing grain size, an adequate representation of the interaction forces and, thus, representation of sub-grid effects such as bubble and cluster formation in the fluidized particulate system becomes challenging. As a result, particle drag can be overestimated, leading to an increase in average particle height. In this work, limitations of the system-to-grain ratio are identified but also a dependency on system width. To address this issue, sub-grid drag models are often applied to increase the accuracy of simulations. Nonetheless, the sub-grid models tend to have an ad hoc fitting, and thorough testing of the system configurations is often missing. Here, five different sub-grid drag models are compared and tested on fluidized bed systems with different Geldart group particles, fluidization velocity, and system-to-grain diameter ratios.\n</p></div>","PeriodicalId":524,"journal":{"name":"Computational Particle Mechanics","volume":"11 3","pages":"1035 - 1054"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40571-023-00671-1.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computational Particle Mechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40571-023-00671-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fluidized particulate systems can be well described by coupling the discrete element method (DEM) with computational fluid dynamics (CFD). However, the simulations are computationally very demanding. The computational demand is drastically reduced by applying the coarse grain (CG) approach, where several particles are summarized into larger grains. Scaling rules are applied to the dominant forces to obtain precise solutions. However, with growing grain size, an adequate representation of the interaction forces and, thus, representation of sub-grid effects such as bubble and cluster formation in the fluidized particulate system becomes challenging. As a result, particle drag can be overestimated, leading to an increase in average particle height. In this work, limitations of the system-to-grain ratio are identified but also a dependency on system width. To address this issue, sub-grid drag models are often applied to increase the accuracy of simulations. Nonetheless, the sub-grid models tend to have an ad hoc fitting, and thorough testing of the system configurations is often missing. Here, five different sub-grid drag models are compared and tested on fluidized bed systems with different Geldart group particles, fluidization velocity, and system-to-grain diameter ratios.

Abstract Image

流化床建模的子网格阻力定律与粗粒 DEM-CFD 方法的比较
通过将离散元素法(DEM)与计算流体动力学(CFD)相结合,可以很好地描述流化颗粒系统。然而,模拟计算的要求非常高。通过应用粗粒(CG)方法,将多个颗粒归纳成较大的颗粒,可大幅降低计算需求。对主要作用力采用缩放规则,以获得精确的解决方案。然而,随着颗粒尺寸的增大,要充分表示相互作用力,从而表示流化颗粒系统中的气泡和团块形成等亚网格效应,就变得十分困难。因此,颗粒阻力可能被高估,导致颗粒平均高度增加。在这项工作中,不仅发现了系统与颗粒比率的限制,还发现了系统宽度的依赖性。为了解决这个问题,通常采用子网格阻力模型来提高模拟的准确性。然而,子网格模型往往是临时拟合的,往往缺乏对系统配置的全面测试。在此,我们对五种不同的子网格阻力模型进行了比较,并在具有不同 Geldart 组颗粒、流化速度和系统与颗粒直径比的流化床系统上进行了测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Computational Particle Mechanics
Computational Particle Mechanics Mathematics-Computational Mathematics
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
75
期刊介绍: GENERAL OBJECTIVES: Computational Particle Mechanics (CPM) is a quarterly journal with the goal of publishing full-length original articles addressing the modeling and simulation of systems involving particles and particle methods. The goal is to enhance communication among researchers in the applied sciences who use "particles'''' in one form or another in their research. SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES: Particle-based materials and numerical methods have become wide-spread in the natural and applied sciences, engineering, biology. The term "particle methods/mechanics'''' has now come to imply several different things to researchers in the 21st century, including: (a) Particles as a physical unit in granular media, particulate flows, plasmas, swarms, etc., (b) Particles representing material phases in continua at the meso-, micro-and nano-scale and (c) Particles as a discretization unit in continua and discontinua in numerical methods such as Discrete Element Methods (DEM), Particle Finite Element Methods (PFEM), Molecular Dynamics (MD), and Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH), to name a few.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信