A retrospective CT based comparative analysis of available screw pathways to determine optimal iliac screw trajectory

Atul Sareen, Anuradha Sharma, Jatin Prakash, Hitesh Lal, Ashish Bansal, Ashish Jaiman
{"title":"A retrospective CT based comparative analysis of available screw pathways to determine optimal iliac screw trajectory","authors":"Atul Sareen, Anuradha Sharma, Jatin Prakash, Hitesh Lal, Ashish Bansal, Ashish Jaiman","doi":"10.23950/jcmk/13756","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<b>Introduction:</b> The lumbo-sacral stabilization using iliac screw is gaining popularity in such cases of long multi segment lumbar constructs. Iliac screws help to achieve strong spinopelvic fixation, augments and protects sacral screws. However, there is a great variability found in literature for iliac screw fixation in terms of trajectory, screw length and screw diameter. Also, to the best of our knowledge, there is lacunae in current literature regarding the optimal pathway, screw length and screw diameter in the Indian population. Hence, we planned the study with the aim to analyze the available screw pathways to determine optimal iliac screw trajectory, screw length and diameter for the Indian population.<br /> <b>Material and methods:</b> This was a tertiary center-based retrospective study. One hundred pelvic CT scans of patients in 18-70 years age, who underwent abdominal CT on Siemens 256-slice dual source CT scanner for various indications were evaluated. Subsequently, 4 iliac screw trajectories were assessed by connecting the points given below using double oblique reformats on which the lengths and narrowest zones of these trajectories were measured. Path A: Posterior Superior Iliac Spine (PSIS) to Anterior Superior Iliac Spine (AIIS); Path B: point between PSIS and posterior inferior iliac spine (PIIS) to Anterior Inferior iliac spine&amp;nbsp; (AIIS); Path C: iliac crest intersection point (CLIC) point to Upper acetabulum; Path D: CLIC point to acetabular center.<br /> [p1]&amp;nbsp;<b>[a2]&amp;nbsp;Results:</b> Statistically significant difference was found in the lengths of various pathways. Path A (PSIS to AIIS) was found to be the longest (mean 13 cm). The second longest path in our study was path C (CLIC point to Upper acetabulum). The narrowest widths of each path were not found to have any statistically significant difference.<br /> <b>Conclusion:</b> Iliac screw fixation is of paramount importance for lumbosacral stabilization. Of the studied paths, trajectory from posterior-superior iliac spine to Antero-inferior iliac spine has the longest passage length and is the most optimal path for the Indian population. In case additional screws are required, the trajectory from CLIC point to Upper acetabulum provides the second largest screw passage.","PeriodicalId":32426,"journal":{"name":"Kazakstannyn Klinikalyk Medicinasy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kazakstannyn Klinikalyk Medicinasy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23950/jcmk/13756","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The lumbo-sacral stabilization using iliac screw is gaining popularity in such cases of long multi segment lumbar constructs. Iliac screws help to achieve strong spinopelvic fixation, augments and protects sacral screws. However, there is a great variability found in literature for iliac screw fixation in terms of trajectory, screw length and screw diameter. Also, to the best of our knowledge, there is lacunae in current literature regarding the optimal pathway, screw length and screw diameter in the Indian population. Hence, we planned the study with the aim to analyze the available screw pathways to determine optimal iliac screw trajectory, screw length and diameter for the Indian population.
Material and methods: This was a tertiary center-based retrospective study. One hundred pelvic CT scans of patients in 18-70 years age, who underwent abdominal CT on Siemens 256-slice dual source CT scanner for various indications were evaluated. Subsequently, 4 iliac screw trajectories were assessed by connecting the points given below using double oblique reformats on which the lengths and narrowest zones of these trajectories were measured. Path A: Posterior Superior Iliac Spine (PSIS) to Anterior Superior Iliac Spine (AIIS); Path B: point between PSIS and posterior inferior iliac spine (PIIS) to Anterior Inferior iliac spine&nbsp; (AIIS); Path C: iliac crest intersection point (CLIC) point to Upper acetabulum; Path D: CLIC point to acetabular center.
[p1]&nbsp;[a2]&nbsp;Results: Statistically significant difference was found in the lengths of various pathways. Path A (PSIS to AIIS) was found to be the longest (mean 13 cm). The second longest path in our study was path C (CLIC point to Upper acetabulum). The narrowest widths of each path were not found to have any statistically significant difference.
Conclusion: Iliac screw fixation is of paramount importance for lumbosacral stabilization. Of the studied paths, trajectory from posterior-superior iliac spine to Antero-inferior iliac spine has the longest passage length and is the most optimal path for the Indian population. In case additional screws are required, the trajectory from CLIC point to Upper acetabulum provides the second largest screw passage.
回顾性CT为基础的比较分析,以确定最佳的髂螺钉轨迹
& lt; b>介绍:& lt; / b>在长多节段腰椎结构的情况下,使用髂螺钉进行腰骶稳定越来越受欢迎。髂螺钉有助于实现强大的脊柱骨盆固定,增强和保护骶骨螺钉。然而,在文献中发现髂螺钉固定在轨迹、螺钉长度和螺钉直径方面存在很大差异。此外,据我们所知,目前文献中关于印度人群的最佳路径、螺钉长度和螺钉直径存在空白。因此,我们计划了这项研究,目的是分析可用的螺钉路径,以确定适合印度人群的最佳髂骨螺钉轨迹、螺钉长度和直径。材料和方法:</b>这是一项基于三级中心的回顾性研究。本文对100例年龄在18-70岁的患者进行盆腔CT扫描,这些患者在西门子256层双源CT上进行了各种适应症的腹部CT扫描。随后,4个髂螺钉轨迹通过连接以下给出的点进行评估,使用双斜复位,测量这些轨迹的长度和最窄区域。路径A:髂后上棘(PSIS)至髂前上棘(AIIS);路径B: PSIS与髂后下棘(PIIS)之间点至髂前下棘;(暗);路径C:髂嵴交点(CLIC)点至髋臼上段;路径D: CLIC点至髋臼中心。<br />(p1),, & lt; b> (a2),,结果:& lt; / b>不同通路的长度差异有统计学意义。路径A (PSIS至AIIS)最长,平均为13 cm。在我们的研究中,第二长的路径是路径C (CLIC点至上髋臼)。每个路径的最窄宽度没有发现任何统计学上的显著差异。<br />& lt; b>结论:& lt; / b>髂螺钉固定对腰骶稳定至关重要。在所研究的路径中,从髂后上棘到髂前下棘的路径长度最长,是印度人群的最佳路径。如果需要额外的螺钉,从CLIC点到髋臼上的轨迹提供了第二大螺钉通道。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信