When planetary cosmopolitanism meets the Buddhist ethic: Recycling, karma and popular ecology in Singapore

IF 3.3 1区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Siew Ying Shee, Orlando Woods, Lily Kong
{"title":"When planetary cosmopolitanism meets the Buddhist ethic: Recycling, <i>karma</i> and popular ecology in Singapore","authors":"Siew Ying Shee, Orlando Woods, Lily Kong","doi":"10.1111/tran.12654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract By thinking with and through Buddhist cosmology, this paper explores the emergence of an ethical sensibility—what we call planetary cosmopolitanism—that is based on not just a spatially expanded ethic of care to ecological worlds, but also a temporally extended sense of justice to the future Earth. This transtemporal sense of ethical becoming reflects how the possibility of future ‘rebirth’ and accountability for past actions can motivate new ecological consciousness in the present. We forge these ideas through an empirical focus on popular Buddhist ecological practices in Singapore, where green recovery visions have primarily been driven by a secular and technocratic ethos. In negotiating the prevailing modernist ecological discourses, many Buddhists tap into an alternative imagining of cosmological time that regards Earth not simply as a place to be left behind at the end of one's life, but a permanent home for all future beings. This reading of human–ecology relations emphasises a causal responsibility to secure planetary well‐being, moving the making of cosmopolitan sensibilities from the realm of beneficence into justice. Yet, this renewed cosmopolitan sensibility to Earth is not simply a prescriptive ethical framework articulated on an abstract level, but materially performed and negotiated at the level of everyday life. Recycling becomes a site of rapprochement that allows Buddhists in Singapore to promote and negotiate their ecological consciousness within the strictures of the secular state. In doing so, it opens up new spaces of postcapitalist possibility that enable Buddhists, alongside people of other or no faith, to imagine alternative ways of inhabiting the planet. By developing an alternative account of cosmopolitanism grounded in Buddhist cosmology, we identify Buddhism as a decolonial lens through which we can critically reimagine human–ecology relations, and illuminate diverse modes and practices of ethical becoming in this age of ecological crisis.","PeriodicalId":48278,"journal":{"name":"Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers","volume":"40 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12654","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract By thinking with and through Buddhist cosmology, this paper explores the emergence of an ethical sensibility—what we call planetary cosmopolitanism—that is based on not just a spatially expanded ethic of care to ecological worlds, but also a temporally extended sense of justice to the future Earth. This transtemporal sense of ethical becoming reflects how the possibility of future ‘rebirth’ and accountability for past actions can motivate new ecological consciousness in the present. We forge these ideas through an empirical focus on popular Buddhist ecological practices in Singapore, where green recovery visions have primarily been driven by a secular and technocratic ethos. In negotiating the prevailing modernist ecological discourses, many Buddhists tap into an alternative imagining of cosmological time that regards Earth not simply as a place to be left behind at the end of one's life, but a permanent home for all future beings. This reading of human–ecology relations emphasises a causal responsibility to secure planetary well‐being, moving the making of cosmopolitan sensibilities from the realm of beneficence into justice. Yet, this renewed cosmopolitan sensibility to Earth is not simply a prescriptive ethical framework articulated on an abstract level, but materially performed and negotiated at the level of everyday life. Recycling becomes a site of rapprochement that allows Buddhists in Singapore to promote and negotiate their ecological consciousness within the strictures of the secular state. In doing so, it opens up new spaces of postcapitalist possibility that enable Buddhists, alongside people of other or no faith, to imagine alternative ways of inhabiting the planet. By developing an alternative account of cosmopolitanism grounded in Buddhist cosmology, we identify Buddhism as a decolonial lens through which we can critically reimagine human–ecology relations, and illuminate diverse modes and practices of ethical becoming in this age of ecological crisis.
当地球世界主义与佛教伦理相遇:新加坡的循环利用、因果报应和大众生态
通过对佛教宇宙学的思考,本文探讨了一种伦理敏感性的出现——我们称之为行星世界主义——它不仅基于对生态世界的空间扩展的关怀伦理,而且还基于对未来地球的时间扩展的正义感。这种短暂的伦理意识反映了未来“重生”的可能性和对过去行为的责任如何激发当下新的生态意识。我们通过对新加坡流行的佛教生态实践的实证关注来形成这些想法,在新加坡,绿色复苏的愿景主要是由世俗和技术官僚精神驱动的。在讨论流行的现代主义生态话语时,许多佛教徒采用了另一种宇宙学时间的想象,认为地球不仅仅是一个人生命结束时留下的地方,而是所有未来生命的永久家园。这种对人类生态关系的解读强调了确保地球福祉的因果责任,将世界主义的情感从慈善领域转移到正义领域。然而,这种对地球的新的世界主义的敏感性不仅仅是在抽象层面上阐述的规范性伦理框架,而是在日常生活层面上进行实质性的执行和谈判。回收成为一个和解的场所,允许新加坡的佛教徒在世俗国家的限制下促进和协商他们的生态意识。这样做,它开辟了后资本主义可能性的新空间,使佛教徒能够与其他信仰或没有信仰的人一起想象居住在地球上的其他方式。通过在佛教宇宙论的基础上发展对世界主义的另一种解释,我们将佛教确定为一个非殖民化的镜头,通过它,我们可以批判性地重新想象人类与生态的关系,并阐明在这个生态危机时代道德成为的各种模式和实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: Transactions is one of the foremost international journals of geographical research. It publishes the very best scholarship from around the world and across the whole spectrum of research in the discipline. In particular, the distinctive role of the journal is to: • Publish "landmark· articles that make a major theoretical, conceptual or empirical contribution to the advancement of geography as an academic discipline. • Stimulate and shape research agendas in human and physical geography. • Publish articles, "Boundary crossing" essays and commentaries that are international and interdisciplinary in their scope and content.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信