Enhancing Writing Proficiency: The Role of Model Essays as Corrective Feedback Tools in IELTS Writing Task Achievement and Coherence/Cohesion

Q4 Arts and Humanities
Mohamadreza Jafary, Seyedeh Fatemeh Amani, Brian Benoit
{"title":"Enhancing Writing Proficiency: The Role of Model Essays as Corrective Feedback Tools in IELTS Writing Task Achievement and Coherence/Cohesion","authors":"Mohamadreza Jafary, Seyedeh Fatemeh Amani, Brian Benoit","doi":"10.5539/elt.v16n11p1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Proficiency in IELTS writing tasks is crucial for obtaining high scores in this internationally recognized test. This quasi-experimental study investigated the effectiveness of corrective feedback in improving the gain scores of both academic writing task 1 and task 2. Sixty Iranian students participated in pre/post-test administrations, with the experimental group receiving instruction based on the analysis made on 10 model essays, and the control group received reformulation on their own produced texts. Two skilled raters assessed the students' typewritten texts in terms of task response and "coherence/cohesion" – two writing band descriptors. After conducting ANOVA and Bonferroni post hoc tests, the results demonstrated that the treatment group achieved significantly higher scores in the two mentioned components. In both the post-test and delayed post-test, the Experimental Group (EG) consistently outperformed the Control Group (CG) in task response sub-scale of academic writing task 1 & 2 (p < 0.05). Further examination, employing a multi-mediator approach, accentuates the substantial impact of these writing rubrics on the overall IELTS score. Additionally, within the EG, there was a significant increase in coherence scores between the pretest and posttest (p < 0.05). However, no statistically significant change was observed between the post-test and the delayed post test (p > 0.05).","PeriodicalId":30319,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian English Language Teaching Journal","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian English Language Teaching Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v16n11p1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Proficiency in IELTS writing tasks is crucial for obtaining high scores in this internationally recognized test. This quasi-experimental study investigated the effectiveness of corrective feedback in improving the gain scores of both academic writing task 1 and task 2. Sixty Iranian students participated in pre/post-test administrations, with the experimental group receiving instruction based on the analysis made on 10 model essays, and the control group received reformulation on their own produced texts. Two skilled raters assessed the students' typewritten texts in terms of task response and "coherence/cohesion" – two writing band descriptors. After conducting ANOVA and Bonferroni post hoc tests, the results demonstrated that the treatment group achieved significantly higher scores in the two mentioned components. In both the post-test and delayed post-test, the Experimental Group (EG) consistently outperformed the Control Group (CG) in task response sub-scale of academic writing task 1 & 2 (p < 0.05). Further examination, employing a multi-mediator approach, accentuates the substantial impact of these writing rubrics on the overall IELTS score. Additionally, within the EG, there was a significant increase in coherence scores between the pretest and posttest (p < 0.05). However, no statistically significant change was observed between the post-test and the delayed post test (p > 0.05).
提高写作水平:范文作为纠正反馈工具在雅思写作任务成就和连贯性/凝聚力中的作用
熟练掌握雅思写作任务对于在这项国际公认的考试中获得高分至关重要。本拟实验研究探讨了纠正反馈对提高学术写作任务1和任务2的得分的有效性。60名伊朗学生参加了测试前/测试后的管理,实验组根据对10篇示范文章的分析接受指导,对照组根据自己编写的文本重新编写。两名熟练的评分员对学生进行了评估。在任务响应和“连贯/衔接”方面的打字文本;, mdash;两个写带描述符。在进行方差分析和Bonferroni事后检验后,结果表明治疗组在上述两个成分上取得了显著更高的分数。在后测和延迟后测中,实验组(EG)在学术写作任务1的任务反应子量表上的表现均优于对照组(CG)。2 (p <0.05)。进一步的考试,采用多中介方法,强调这些写作规则对整体雅思成绩的实质性影响。此外,在EG中,测试前和测试后的一致性得分显著增加(p <0.05)。然而,后测和延迟后测之间没有统计学上的显著变化(p >0.05)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brazilian English Language Teaching Journal
Brazilian English Language Teaching Journal Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信