PRACTICES OF REPRESENTATION OF SPACE AS AN OBJECT OF CULTURAL STUDIES

Rostyslav Fanahei
{"title":"PRACTICES OF REPRESENTATION OF SPACE AS AN OBJECT OF CULTURAL STUDIES","authors":"Rostyslav Fanahei","doi":"10.17721/ucs.2023.1(12).08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is aimed at substantiating the potential of \"spatial expansion\" of both problematics and optics of cultural studies in their deepening and systematization by the conceptualization of practices of representing space. Late modern cultural studies in general actualize questions not about means of mediation — representations as objects, such as artifacts or mentifacts, and about the very methods of mediation — representations as processes — which is what practices are. At the same time, the \"expansion\" of these studies, outlined in the article, justifies such adjustment and allows to fully reveal under the temporal production of meanings the corporeal-spatial production of presence, as the basis of human experience of the world, and spatial organization as the main instrument of visual and tactile power relations, which are exercised through discourses, or directly. Moreover, it enables the systematization of a heterogeneous ensemble of practices of representing space in their historical dynamics. A. Lefebvre conceptualized this multiplicity of practices in the constant interaction of \"representations of space\" and \"spaces of representation\", which should be considered as fillings of the Foucault dispositive system between catching and the environment. Representations of space as a way of practice reflect the rationalized and visualized production of meanings in terms of both reflection and construction. Spaces of representation reflect the symbolic-corporeal dimension of representation as an imprint of presence, thanks to which we transform the world with our projection, and the presence of the world is given to us for use. On the basis of the outlined system, it is possible to single out a number of practices that are quite generalized and that exert, perhaps, a greater influence on the historical dynamics of the entire heterogeneous ensemble. This series of practices of \"spatial issues\" justifies the expediency of \"spatial optics\" at the subject level","PeriodicalId":52653,"journal":{"name":"Ukrayins''ki kul''turologichni studiyi","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ukrayins''ki kul''turologichni studiyi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17721/ucs.2023.1(12).08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article is aimed at substantiating the potential of "spatial expansion" of both problematics and optics of cultural studies in their deepening and systematization by the conceptualization of practices of representing space. Late modern cultural studies in general actualize questions not about means of mediation — representations as objects, such as artifacts or mentifacts, and about the very methods of mediation — representations as processes — which is what practices are. At the same time, the "expansion" of these studies, outlined in the article, justifies such adjustment and allows to fully reveal under the temporal production of meanings the corporeal-spatial production of presence, as the basis of human experience of the world, and spatial organization as the main instrument of visual and tactile power relations, which are exercised through discourses, or directly. Moreover, it enables the systematization of a heterogeneous ensemble of practices of representing space in their historical dynamics. A. Lefebvre conceptualized this multiplicity of practices in the constant interaction of "representations of space" and "spaces of representation", which should be considered as fillings of the Foucault dispositive system between catching and the environment. Representations of space as a way of practice reflect the rationalized and visualized production of meanings in terms of both reflection and construction. Spaces of representation reflect the symbolic-corporeal dimension of representation as an imprint of presence, thanks to which we transform the world with our projection, and the presence of the world is given to us for use. On the basis of the outlined system, it is possible to single out a number of practices that are quite generalized and that exert, perhaps, a greater influence on the historical dynamics of the entire heterogeneous ensemble. This series of practices of "spatial issues" justifies the expediency of "spatial optics" at the subject level
作为文化研究对象的空间表现实践
本文旨在通过对空间表现实践的概念化,证实文化研究的问题学和光学学在其深化和系统化方面的“空间扩展”潜力。一般来说,现代晚期文化研究的问题不是关于中介手段——作为客体的表征,如人工制品或文物,而是关于中介的方法——作为过程的表征——这就是实践。同时,本文概述的这些研究的“扩展”为这种调整提供了理由,并允许在时间意义生产下充分揭示作为人类世界经验基础的存在的物质-空间生产,以及作为视觉和触觉权力关系的主要工具的空间组织,这些权力关系通过话语或直接行使。此外,它使在其历史动态中表现空间的异质综合实践的系统化。列斐伏尔在“空间的表征”和“表征的空间”的不断互动中概念化了这种实践的多样性,这应该被认为是福柯在捕捉和环境之间的决定系统的填充。空间的再现作为一种实践方式,从反思和建构两个方面反映了意义的理性化和形象化生产。表征空间作为临在的印记反映了表征的符号-形体维度,因此我们用我们的投射来改造世界,世界的临在被赋予我们使用。在概述的系统的基础上,有可能挑选出一些相当一般化的实践,并且可能对整个异质组合的历史动态产生更大的影响。这一系列关于“空间问题”的实践,证明了“空间光学”在学科层面的权宜之计
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信