Updating the Standard Definition of Creativity to Account for the Artificial Creativity of AI

IF 2.5 3区心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL

Creativity Research Journal Pub Date : 2023-10-10 DOI:10.1080/10400419.2023.2257977

Mark A. Runco

引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACTRecent developments in AI compel an update of the “standard definition of creativity.” This short article cites various proposed additions to the standard definition, which point to Surprise, Value, Authenticity, and Intentionality. The latter two are the most useful when distinguishing human from artificial (machine) creativity. Artificial creativity can be contrasted with pseudo-creativity as well as human creativity. Artificial creativity may be the best way to describe the output from AI. Even when that output is original and effective, it lacks the authenticity and intentionality that is apparent in human creativity. Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. As of June 2023.

查看原文本刊更多论文

更新创造力的标准定义，以考虑人工智能的人工创造力

人工智能的最新发展迫使人们对“创造力的标准定义”进行更新。这篇短文引用了对标准定义的各种建议，包括惊喜、价值、真实性和意向性。后两者在区分人类创造力和人工(机器)创造力时最有用。人工创造力可以与伪创造力对比，也可以与人的创造力对比。人工创造力可能是描述人工智能产出的最佳方式。即使这种产出是原创和有效的，它也缺乏人类创造力中显而易见的真实性和意向性。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。截至2023年6月。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Creativity Research Journal Multiple-

CiteScore

5.10

自引率

7.70%

发文量

期刊介绍： Creativity Research Journal publishes high-quality, scholarly research capturing the full range of approaches to the study of creativity--behavioral, clinical, cognitive, crosscultural, developmental, educational, genetic, organizational, psychoanalytic, psychometrics, and social. Interdisciplinary research is also published, as is research within specific domains (e.g., art, science) and research on critical issues (e.g., aesthetics, genius, imagery, imagination, incubation, insight, intuition, metaphor, play, problem finding and solving). Integrative literature reviews and theoretical pieces that appreciate empirical work are extremely welcome, but purely speculative articles are not published. Readers are encouraged to send commentaries, comments, and evaluative book reviews.