ASSESSMENT OF WATER QUALITY OF URBANIZED TERRITORIES ACCORDING TO THE STRUCTURE OF HYDROBIONT GROUPS

Y. Sheliuk, L. Shevchuk, M. Moshkivska
{"title":"ASSESSMENT OF WATER QUALITY OF URBANIZED TERRITORIES ACCORDING TO THE STRUCTURE OF HYDROBIONT GROUPS","authors":"Y. Sheliuk, L. Shevchuk, M. Moshkivska","doi":"10.35433/naturaljournal.3.2023.76-90","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper proves the possibility of conducting water quality assessment using such an indicator as the species assemblage of Unionidae habitats for the purpose of conducting local bioindication. According to the species assemblage of Unionidae habitats, it was established that of the five analyzed sites of material collection of the main stream of the Teteriv River, in one case the water quality can be assessed as \"Dirty\", which corresponds to the IV water quality class, and in three cases as \"Contaminated\", which corresponds to the III class, and in another one - as \"Good\" - II class of quality. The rivers Guiva (Ivankiv), Kroshenka and Putyatinka within Zhytomyr belong to the IV class of water quality. Five more points are assigned to the II quality class (Guyva River in the area of Pryazhevo and Zarichany villages; Kam'yanka River (Zhytomyr); Kodenka River (Vertokiyivka village) and Hnylop'yat River (Berdychiv).More detailed information about the ecological state of aquatic ecosystems is provided by the use of algal communities of plankton as biological descriptors, but this approach is time-consuming. In general, the bioindication of water quality in the rivers of the Teteriv basin according to phytoplankton showed the predominance of indicators of saprobity, which correspond to the III class of water quality (\"Contaminated\"). Class II (\"Good\") indicators make up a significant share. A moderate level of organic water pollution is indicated by the predominance of eurysaprobes in the rivers. In terms of phytoplankton biomass, the Teteriv and Kroshenka rivers belong to the III class of water quality, other watercourses belong to the II class. According to the saprobity index, the water quality of the Teteriv, Putyatinka, and Kroshenka rivers is rated as satisfactory, and that of other watercourses as good. According to primary production and the ratio of production and destruction processes, watercourses were ranked into three groups - those belonging to II, III and IV water quality classes. The average values of the integral index ∑А/∑R for all watercourses, except for the Putyatinka River, are higher than 1. This indicates a positive balance of organic matter, characteristic of aquatic ecosystems with a high intensity of photosynthesis. The predominance of the heterotrophic phase in Putyatynka is most likely a response of the watercourse ecosystem to anthropogenic pressure.A comprehensive assessment of the water quality of watercourses in urbanized areas using as biological descriptors the ecological state of hydroecosystems of algae, plankton and mollusk settlements is the foundation for further ecological monitoring of waters, forecasting changes in the autotrophic and heterotrophic links of aquatic ecosystems under the influence of environmental factors.","PeriodicalId":188435,"journal":{"name":"Ukrainian Journal of Natural Sciences","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ukrainian Journal of Natural Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35433/naturaljournal.3.2023.76-90","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper proves the possibility of conducting water quality assessment using such an indicator as the species assemblage of Unionidae habitats for the purpose of conducting local bioindication. According to the species assemblage of Unionidae habitats, it was established that of the five analyzed sites of material collection of the main stream of the Teteriv River, in one case the water quality can be assessed as "Dirty", which corresponds to the IV water quality class, and in three cases as "Contaminated", which corresponds to the III class, and in another one - as "Good" - II class of quality. The rivers Guiva (Ivankiv), Kroshenka and Putyatinka within Zhytomyr belong to the IV class of water quality. Five more points are assigned to the II quality class (Guyva River in the area of Pryazhevo and Zarichany villages; Kam'yanka River (Zhytomyr); Kodenka River (Vertokiyivka village) and Hnylop'yat River (Berdychiv).More detailed information about the ecological state of aquatic ecosystems is provided by the use of algal communities of plankton as biological descriptors, but this approach is time-consuming. In general, the bioindication of water quality in the rivers of the Teteriv basin according to phytoplankton showed the predominance of indicators of saprobity, which correspond to the III class of water quality ("Contaminated"). Class II ("Good") indicators make up a significant share. A moderate level of organic water pollution is indicated by the predominance of eurysaprobes in the rivers. In terms of phytoplankton biomass, the Teteriv and Kroshenka rivers belong to the III class of water quality, other watercourses belong to the II class. According to the saprobity index, the water quality of the Teteriv, Putyatinka, and Kroshenka rivers is rated as satisfactory, and that of other watercourses as good. According to primary production and the ratio of production and destruction processes, watercourses were ranked into three groups - those belonging to II, III and IV water quality classes. The average values of the integral index ∑А/∑R for all watercourses, except for the Putyatinka River, are higher than 1. This indicates a positive balance of organic matter, characteristic of aquatic ecosystems with a high intensity of photosynthesis. The predominance of the heterotrophic phase in Putyatynka is most likely a response of the watercourse ecosystem to anthropogenic pressure.A comprehensive assessment of the water quality of watercourses in urbanized areas using as biological descriptors the ecological state of hydroecosystems of algae, plankton and mollusk settlements is the foundation for further ecological monitoring of waters, forecasting changes in the autotrophic and heterotrophic links of aquatic ecosystems under the influence of environmental factors.
基于水生物类群结构的城市化地区水质评价
本文论证了利用银联科生境物种组合这一指标进行水质评价以进行局部生物指示的可能性。根据乌龙科生境的物种组合,确定了在捷捷列夫河干流5个资料采集点中,1个水质可评价为“脏”,水质等级为IV级;3个水质可评价为“污染”,水质等级为III级;1个水质可评价为“好”,水质等级为II级。日托米尔境内的吉瓦河(伊万科夫河)、克罗申卡河和普蒂亚廷卡河属于IV级水质。二级质量等级(Pryazhevo和Zarichany村庄地区的Guyva河;卡延卡河(日托米尔);Kodenka河(Vertokiyivka村)和Hnylop'yat河(Berdychiv)。使用浮游生物的藻类群落作为生物描述符,可以提供关于水生生态系统生态状态的更详细信息,但这种方法很耗时。总体而言,Teteriv流域河流浮游植物对水质的生物指示以污染指标为主,对应于III类水质(“污染”)。第二类(“良好”)指标占很大比例。有机水体污染程度适中,主要表现在河流中含磷磷磷较多。在浮游植物生物量方面,Teteriv河和Kroshenka河属于III类水质,其他河道属于II类水质。根据沙性指数,捷捷列夫河、普季亚金卡河和克罗申卡河的水质为满意,其他河道水质为良好。根据初级生产和生产过程与破坏过程的比例,将河道划分为二类、三类和四级水质等级。除Putyatinka河外,其余河道的积分指数∑А/∑R平均值均大于1。这表明有机质正平衡,是光合作用强度高的水生生态系统的特征。Putyatynka异养期的优势很可能是水道生态系统对人为压力的反应。以藻类、浮游生物和软体动物群落的水生生态系统生态状态作为生物描述因子,对城市化地区河道水质进行综合评价,是进一步开展水体生态监测、预测水体生态系统自养和异养环节在环境因子影响下变化的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信