A Hobbesian Method for Establishing the Absurdity of Injustice Without Reliance on Hobbes’s Temporal Arguments

IF 0.1 0 PHILOSOPHY

Hobbes Studies Pub Date : 2023-10-11 DOI:10.1163/18750257-bja10065

S.A. Lloyd

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The paper investigates Hobbes’s arguments that injustice is a kind of absurdity involving a “contradiction properly so called,” concluding that although those arguments are undermined by their reliance on a mistaken temporality assumption, Hobbes’s philosophy provides other means for establishing his desired conclusion.

查看原文本刊更多论文

不依赖于霍布斯的时间论证而确立非正义的荒谬的霍布斯方法

摘要本文考察了霍布斯关于不公正是一种包含“所谓矛盾”的荒谬的论点，并得出结论，尽管这些论点由于依赖于错误的时间性假设而受到破坏，但霍布斯的哲学为建立他所期望的结论提供了其他途径。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Hobbes Studies PHILOSOPHY-

CiteScore

0.70

自引率

33.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： Hobbes Studies is an international peer reviewed scholarly journal. Its interests are twofold; first, in publishing research about the philosophical, political, historical, literary, and scientific matters related to Thomas Hobbes"s own thought, at the beginning of the modern state and the rise of science, and also in a comparison of his views to other important thinkers; second, because of Hobbes"s enduring influence in stimulating social and political theory, the journal is interested in publishing such discussions. Articles and occasional book reviews are peer reviewed. The International Hobbes Association is associated with the journal but submissions are open.