Lasswell Communication Model to Improve Students' Mathematical Concepts Understanding Ability

Mai Sri Lena, Netriwati Netriwati, Ika Suryanita, Fastabuqul Khairat, Ulfah Putri Efendi
{"title":"Lasswell Communication Model to Improve Students' Mathematical Concepts Understanding Ability","authors":"Mai Sri Lena, Netriwati Netriwati, Ika Suryanita, Fastabuqul Khairat, Ulfah Putri Efendi","doi":"10.12928/ijeme.v6i2.20913","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aimed to discover the difference in the increase of students' mathematical concepts understanding using Lasswell communication model and conventional model. This was quasi-experimental research. Data were collected through a test of mathematical concepts understanding. The sample of this research was Public High School 4, where class X.1 and class X. 2 as an experiment and control class respectively. Inferential statistics was used to analyze the data. The findings showed that the increase of average of students' mathematical concepts understanding ability of experimental class was 0.733, while in the control class was 0.550. Furthermore, the results of the analysis of the t-test with significance level were 5%, showed that t score>T-table, meaning H0 was rejected. The conclusion was that there was a difference in the increment of students' mathematical concepts understanding using Lasswell Communication model and conventional model. Therefore, increasing the students' ability of mathematical concepts understanding using the Lasswell Communication Model was better than the conventional model.","PeriodicalId":484223,"journal":{"name":"International journal on emerging mathematics education","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal on emerging mathematics education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12928/ijeme.v6i2.20913","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research aimed to discover the difference in the increase of students' mathematical concepts understanding using Lasswell communication model and conventional model. This was quasi-experimental research. Data were collected through a test of mathematical concepts understanding. The sample of this research was Public High School 4, where class X.1 and class X. 2 as an experiment and control class respectively. Inferential statistics was used to analyze the data. The findings showed that the increase of average of students' mathematical concepts understanding ability of experimental class was 0.733, while in the control class was 0.550. Furthermore, the results of the analysis of the t-test with significance level were 5%, showed that t score>T-table, meaning H0 was rejected. The conclusion was that there was a difference in the increment of students' mathematical concepts understanding using Lasswell Communication model and conventional model. Therefore, increasing the students' ability of mathematical concepts understanding using the Lasswell Communication Model was better than the conventional model.
提高学生数学概念理解能力的laswell沟通模式
本研究旨在发现使用拉斯韦尔交流模式和传统交流模式在提高学生对数学概念理解方面的差异。这是一项准实验研究。数据是通过数学概念理解测试收集的。本研究的样本为公立高中4,其中X.1班和X. 2班分别作为实验班和对照班。采用推理统计方法对数据进行分析。结果表明,实验班学生对数学概念理解能力的平均提高幅度为0.733,对照组学生的平均提高幅度为0.550。进一步,t检验的分析结果显著性水平为5%,表明t得分> t表,意义H0被拒绝。结果表明:采用拉斯韦尔交流模式和传统交流模式的学生对数学概念理解的增量存在差异。因此,使用拉斯韦尔交流模式比传统模式更能提高学生对数学概念的理解能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信