Investigation of Traditional and Web 2.0 Supported (A Sample of Kahoot) Formative Assessment and Evaluation in Science Course

Sibel Sadi Yılmaz
{"title":"Investigation of Traditional and Web 2.0 Supported (A Sample of Kahoot) Formative Assessment and Evaluation in Science Course","authors":"Sibel Sadi Yılmaz","doi":"10.34293/education.v11is1-oct.6689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to examine the views of the course teacher, students’ and participant researcher’s field notes about traditional (smart board, pen and paper, oral) and Web 2.0 supported (A Sample of Kahoot) formative assessment in 5th grade science course. The study employed case study design. The participants of the study were a science teacher, 58 students and a participant researcher. The data of the study were obtained from a semi-structured teacher/student opinion form and field notes consisting of the participant researcher’s observations. The data were analysed descriptively with Maxqda Plus software. At the end of the study, common positive views on traditional and Kahoot formative assessment were determined; however, in Kahoot formative assessment, it was determined that the teacher had difficulty in classroom management (too muchnoise in the classroom environment). In the traditional formative assessment process, students stated that they disliked solving the questions on the board incorrectly and in the Kahoot formative assessment process, they disliked the competitive environment in the classroom. In line with these results, it can be said that in order for formative assessment to achieve its purpose, teachers need in-service training on classroom management and creating a classroom environment where students feel comfortable.","PeriodicalId":214450,"journal":{"name":"Shanlax International Journal of Education","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shanlax International Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v11is1-oct.6689","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the views of the course teacher, students’ and participant researcher’s field notes about traditional (smart board, pen and paper, oral) and Web 2.0 supported (A Sample of Kahoot) formative assessment in 5th grade science course. The study employed case study design. The participants of the study were a science teacher, 58 students and a participant researcher. The data of the study were obtained from a semi-structured teacher/student opinion form and field notes consisting of the participant researcher’s observations. The data were analysed descriptively with Maxqda Plus software. At the end of the study, common positive views on traditional and Kahoot formative assessment were determined; however, in Kahoot formative assessment, it was determined that the teacher had difficulty in classroom management (too muchnoise in the classroom environment). In the traditional formative assessment process, students stated that they disliked solving the questions on the board incorrectly and in the Kahoot formative assessment process, they disliked the competitive environment in the classroom. In line with these results, it can be said that in order for formative assessment to achieve its purpose, teachers need in-service training on classroom management and creating a classroom environment where students feel comfortable.
传统与Web 2.0支持的科学课程形成性评价研究(以Kahoot为例
本研究的目的是考察课程教师、学生和参与者研究者的实地笔记对五年级科学课程中传统(智能板、笔和纸、口头)和Web 2.0支持(Kahoot样本)形成性评估的看法。本研究采用个案研究设计。该研究的参与者是一名科学教师,58名学生和一名参与研究人员。该研究的数据来自半结构化的教师/学生意见表格和由参与者研究人员的观察组成的现场笔记。用Maxqda Plus软件对数据进行描述性分析。在研究结束时,确定了对传统和Kahoot形成性评价的普遍积极看法;然而,在Kahoot形成性评估中,确定教师在课堂管理方面存在困难(课堂环境噪音太大)。在传统的形成性评估过程中,学生表示他们不喜欢错误地解决黑板上的问题,而在Kahoot形成性评估过程中,他们不喜欢课堂上的竞争环境。根据这些结果,可以说,为了使形成性评价达到其目的,教师需要在职培训课堂管理和创造一个让学生感到舒适的课堂环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书