The peculiarities of mathematic communication of the eight-formers

Viktorija Sičiūnienė
{"title":"The peculiarities of mathematic communication of the eight-formers","authors":"Viktorija Sičiūnienė","doi":"10.15388/lmr.2006.30626","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The national research of 2005 revealed that in the eighth form the achievements in algebra are lower than in other fields of mathematics. The results of the boys are statistically much lower compared to the girls (the author of the article is a member of the research group). The possibility of the eighth-formers (boys and girls) to solve problems in algebra are analyzed and compared in the article. The research included 2146 students. The students were given 16 problems to solve and the girls coped with them approximately 7–12 percent better than the boys. The girls compared with the boys, performed standard operations better, made less mistakes in combining them, and most often carried out them consecutively. The boys did not solve problems and exercises in mathematics especially if the tasks had operations with fractions. The tasks of concrete content containing small numbers were tried to be solved more by the boys. However, to solve them the boys most frequently choose an arithmetic way and wrote down only the answer. It is evident that the period of transition from concrete perception to the abstract one is at an average later for boys than girls. Boys accept loads of abstract notions in algebra more difficult. The authors of textbooks and teachers should pay attention to is phenomenon.","PeriodicalId":33611,"journal":{"name":"Lietuvos Matematikos Rinkinys","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lietuvos Matematikos Rinkinys","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15388/lmr.2006.30626","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The national research of 2005 revealed that in the eighth form the achievements in algebra are lower than in other fields of mathematics. The results of the boys are statistically much lower compared to the girls (the author of the article is a member of the research group). The possibility of the eighth-formers (boys and girls) to solve problems in algebra are analyzed and compared in the article. The research included 2146 students. The students were given 16 problems to solve and the girls coped with them approximately 7–12 percent better than the boys. The girls compared with the boys, performed standard operations better, made less mistakes in combining them, and most often carried out them consecutively. The boys did not solve problems and exercises in mathematics especially if the tasks had operations with fractions. The tasks of concrete content containing small numbers were tried to be solved more by the boys. However, to solve them the boys most frequently choose an arithmetic way and wrote down only the answer. It is evident that the period of transition from concrete perception to the abstract one is at an average later for boys than girls. Boys accept loads of abstract notions in algebra more difficult. The authors of textbooks and teachers should pay attention to is phenomenon.
八年级学生数学交流的特点
2005年的全国调查显示,八年级学生在代数方面的成绩低于其他数学领域。从统计数据来看,男孩的成绩要比女孩低得多(这篇文章的作者是该研究小组的一员)。本文分析和比较了八年级学生(男孩和女孩)解决代数问题的可能性。这项研究包括2146名学生。学生们被要求解决16个问题,女孩的处理能力比男孩好大约7 - 12%。与男孩相比,女孩对标准操作的执行更好,组合错误更少,并且大多数情况下是连续进行的。男孩们不会解决数学问题和习题,尤其是那些有分数运算的作业。具体内容包含小数字的任务则更多地由男生来解决。然而,为了解决这些问题,男孩们通常选择一种算术方法,只写下答案。很明显,男孩从具体知觉到抽象知觉的过渡时期平均比女孩晚。男孩在代数中接受大量抽象概念比较困难。教材的编写者和教师都应注意这一现象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信