In the Eye of the Lion: Iconological Observations on Frontal Depictions of Lions on Ancient Coins

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Gephyra Pub Date : 2023-09-21 DOI:10.37095/gephyra.1252079
Florian HAYMANN
{"title":"In the Eye of the Lion: Iconological Observations on Frontal Depictions of Lions on Ancient Coins","authors":"Florian HAYMANN","doi":"10.37095/gephyra.1252079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article provides an overview of the most important coin types depicting frontal lions from the Greek Archaic period to the first century BC. The spear-biting lions are not included in this paper as they form the subject of a separate study. Starting from the ancient written tradition, explanations are offered based on the effect of the lion’s gaze, which is repeatedly mentioned in ancient texts. With the addition of the respective reverses and modes of representation, it is possible to identify references to religious cults: Apollo, Artemis, Athena, Hera and Heracles. But rulers also used frontal lion images for specific purposes. To express the solar aspect of Apollo, frontality seemed the most appropriate. A particularly close connection between the lion and Loxías has been demonstrated for Rhegion. The example of Samos shows that an autocrat could choose the emblem of a “frontal lion’s head” – probably also to suggest solar qualities. Under Achaemenid influence however, the lion regularly became the victim of the ruler – albeit a particularly dangerous and fearsome one, which was emphasised through its frontality. The same goes for Lysimachus, whose choice of image is astonishingly close to Pliny’s reflex, which focuses entirely on the lion’s sight. It is also shown that lion masks are often associated with the deeds of Heracles, which also gave rise to other coin images in which the use of frontality brought special nuances of meaning, for example the illustration of special effort or a narrative connection between two coin images. In one case, a frontal lion leaping out of a rectangle was associated with the cult of Athena. Another group of frontal lions may have had an apotropaic-demonic character, mainly conveyed by the eyes fixed on the observer. Here we can see a connection with the Gorgoneion. As for the frequent image of devouring lions, a biblical source suggests that the animals were particularly irritable and dangerous during this process. Finally, it was recommended that lions and leopards should be carefully separated, with leopards being particularly suitable for depicting the ‘man-destroying’ god Dionysus in frontal perspective.","PeriodicalId":37539,"journal":{"name":"Gephyra","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gephyra","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37095/gephyra.1252079","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article provides an overview of the most important coin types depicting frontal lions from the Greek Archaic period to the first century BC. The spear-biting lions are not included in this paper as they form the subject of a separate study. Starting from the ancient written tradition, explanations are offered based on the effect of the lion’s gaze, which is repeatedly mentioned in ancient texts. With the addition of the respective reverses and modes of representation, it is possible to identify references to religious cults: Apollo, Artemis, Athena, Hera and Heracles. But rulers also used frontal lion images for specific purposes. To express the solar aspect of Apollo, frontality seemed the most appropriate. A particularly close connection between the lion and Loxías has been demonstrated for Rhegion. The example of Samos shows that an autocrat could choose the emblem of a “frontal lion’s head” – probably also to suggest solar qualities. Under Achaemenid influence however, the lion regularly became the victim of the ruler – albeit a particularly dangerous and fearsome one, which was emphasised through its frontality. The same goes for Lysimachus, whose choice of image is astonishingly close to Pliny’s reflex, which focuses entirely on the lion’s sight. It is also shown that lion masks are often associated with the deeds of Heracles, which also gave rise to other coin images in which the use of frontality brought special nuances of meaning, for example the illustration of special effort or a narrative connection between two coin images. In one case, a frontal lion leaping out of a rectangle was associated with the cult of Athena. Another group of frontal lions may have had an apotropaic-demonic character, mainly conveyed by the eyes fixed on the observer. Here we can see a connection with the Gorgoneion. As for the frequent image of devouring lions, a biblical source suggests that the animals were particularly irritable and dangerous during this process. Finally, it was recommended that lions and leopards should be carefully separated, with leopards being particularly suitable for depicting the ‘man-destroying’ god Dionysus in frontal perspective.
在狮子的眼中:对古钱币正面狮子描绘的符号学观察
本文概述了从古希腊时期到公元前一世纪描绘正面狮子的最重要的硬币类型。咬矛狮子不包括在这篇论文中,因为它们构成了一个单独研究的主题。从古代的文字传统出发,根据狮子凝视的效果提供解释,这在古代文献中被反复提到。加上各自的反面和表现方式,就有可能识别出对宗教崇拜的参考:阿波罗、阿尔忒弥斯、雅典娜、赫拉和赫拉克勒斯。但统治者也使用正面狮子图像用于特定目的。为了表达阿波罗的太阳面,正面似乎是最合适的。狮子和Loxías之间特别密切的联系已经被证明是雷金的。萨摩斯的例子表明,独裁者可以选择“正面狮子头”的标志——可能也暗示了太阳的特质。然而,在阿契美尼德的影响下,狮子经常成为统治者的牺牲品——尽管它是特别危险和可怕的,这一点通过它的正面来强调。吕西马科斯也是如此,他选择的图像与普林尼的反射惊人地接近,后者完全集中在狮子的视线上。研究还表明,狮子面具经常与赫拉克勒斯的事迹联系在一起,这也导致了其他硬币形象的出现,其中正面的使用带来了特殊的细微差别,例如特别努力的说明或两个硬币形象之间的叙事联系。在一个案例中,一头正面的狮子从一个长方形中跳出来与对雅典娜的崇拜有关。另一组正面的狮子可能有一种远离恶魔的特征,主要是通过盯着观察者的眼睛来传达的。在这里,我们可以看到它与山楂花的联系。至于经常出现的吞食狮子的形象,圣经资料表明,在这个过程中,这些动物特别易怒和危险。最后,有人建议狮子和豹子应该小心地分开,豹子特别适合描绘“毁灭人类”的狄俄尼索斯神的正面视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gephyra
Gephyra Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Gephyra - a Journal for the Ancient History and Cultures of the Eastern Mediterranean - is an open access publication platform for articles from all fields of research into Asia Minor and the Eastern Mediterranean, insofar as they shed new light on the history and culture of this geographical and historical region. Scope: Epigraphic, archaeological, numismatic and art historical contributions, commented and evaluated material presentations, as well as historical reflections and essays are all equally welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信