Which Scale Direction is More Difficult for Respondents to Use? An Eye-tracking Study

Ting Yan
{"title":"Which Scale Direction is More Difficult for Respondents to Use? An Eye-tracking Study","authors":"Ting Yan","doi":"10.29115/sp-2023-0015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Scale direction is found to affect response distributions by yielding more selections of scale points closer to the beginning of the scale. Although this phenomenon has been empirically demonstrated in different modes of data collection for respondents with different demographic characteristics, it is not clear which scale direction is cognitively difficult for respondents to use. Eye-tracking is used to address this research question because it provides a direct window into how respondents process survey questions. I compared dilation and fixation measures across scale direction and found that the satisfaction scale and the frequency scale running from “Never” to “Very Often” had more and longer fixations. In addition, the dissatisfaction options incurred larger dilations, more peak dilations, and more and longer fixations than the other parts of the scale. Findings of this paper shed light on how respondents process response scales and have practical implications for questionnaire design. Furthermore, findings of this paper demonstrate the utility and potential of using eye-tracking in general and dilation measures in particular to understand cognitive burden of answering survey questions.","PeriodicalId":74893,"journal":{"name":"Survey practice","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Survey practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29115/sp-2023-0015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Scale direction is found to affect response distributions by yielding more selections of scale points closer to the beginning of the scale. Although this phenomenon has been empirically demonstrated in different modes of data collection for respondents with different demographic characteristics, it is not clear which scale direction is cognitively difficult for respondents to use. Eye-tracking is used to address this research question because it provides a direct window into how respondents process survey questions. I compared dilation and fixation measures across scale direction and found that the satisfaction scale and the frequency scale running from “Never” to “Very Often” had more and longer fixations. In addition, the dissatisfaction options incurred larger dilations, more peak dilations, and more and longer fixations than the other parts of the scale. Findings of this paper shed light on how respondents process response scales and have practical implications for questionnaire design. Furthermore, findings of this paper demonstrate the utility and potential of using eye-tracking in general and dilation measures in particular to understand cognitive burden of answering survey questions.
哪个方向的量表对被调查者来说更难使用?眼球追踪研究
我们发现,通过在更接近量表开始的地方选择更多的量表点,量表方向会影响响应分布。虽然这一现象已经在不同人口统计学特征的受访者的不同数据收集模式中得到了实证证明,但尚不清楚受访者在认知上难以使用哪个量表方向。眼动追踪被用来解决这个研究问题,因为它提供了一个直接的窗口,了解受访者如何处理调查问题。我比较了扩张和固定在量表方向上的测量,发现满意度量表和频率量表从“从不”到“非常经常”有更多和更长时间的固定。此外,不满意选项比其他部分产生更大的膨胀,更多的峰值膨胀,更多和更长时间的固定。本文的研究结果揭示了受访者如何处理反应量表,并对问卷设计具有实际意义。此外,本文的研究结果证明了一般情况下使用眼动追踪的效用和潜力,特别是使用扩张测量来理解回答调查问题的认知负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信