Kicking the Ladder or Not? Unraveling Income Inequality Perceptions in the World

IF 0.5 Q4 ECONOMICS
Özge ERDÖLEK KOZAL, Gülçin GÜREL GÜNAL
{"title":"Kicking the Ladder or Not? Unraveling Income Inequality Perceptions in the World","authors":"Özge ERDÖLEK KOZAL, Gülçin GÜREL GÜNAL","doi":"10.21121/eab.1355923","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aims to explore the factors influencing support for income equality at both the individual and macro levels worldwide. By analyzing the latest data from the World Values Survey, which includes responses from 50,615 individuals across 42 countries, and incorporating key macroeconomic variables obtained from the World Bank, this study identifies several crucial determinants of attitudes towards addressing income inequality using logistic regression analysis. The research findings reveal that factors such as material well-being, life satisfaction, institutional trust, job status, place of residence, level of education, and religiosity play a significant role in shaping individual perceptions of income inequality, particularly in the context of support for either support for redistributive policy or free-market capitalism as potential solutions to mitigate income disparities. Additionally, macro-level variables reveal a substantial influence on support for income equality. Income per capita, income share of the top 10, the unemployment rate, and women's representation in parliament as a proxy for gender equality are found to significantly increase the likelihood of endorsing efforts to reduce income inequality. Our results remain robust when controlling for alternative income-related variables.","PeriodicalId":43307,"journal":{"name":"EGE ACADEMIC REVIEW","volume":"95 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EGE ACADEMIC REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21121/eab.1355923","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research aims to explore the factors influencing support for income equality at both the individual and macro levels worldwide. By analyzing the latest data from the World Values Survey, which includes responses from 50,615 individuals across 42 countries, and incorporating key macroeconomic variables obtained from the World Bank, this study identifies several crucial determinants of attitudes towards addressing income inequality using logistic regression analysis. The research findings reveal that factors such as material well-being, life satisfaction, institutional trust, job status, place of residence, level of education, and religiosity play a significant role in shaping individual perceptions of income inequality, particularly in the context of support for either support for redistributive policy or free-market capitalism as potential solutions to mitigate income disparities. Additionally, macro-level variables reveal a substantial influence on support for income equality. Income per capita, income share of the top 10, the unemployment rate, and women's representation in parliament as a proxy for gender equality are found to significantly increase the likelihood of endorsing efforts to reduce income inequality. Our results remain robust when controlling for alternative income-related variables.
踢不踢梯子?解开世界收入不平等观念
本研究旨在从个人和宏观两个层面探讨影响全球收入平等支持的因素。通过分析《世界价值观调查》(World Values Survey)的最新数据(其中包括来自42个国家的50,615名个人的回复),并结合世界银行提供的关键宏观经济变量,本研究利用逻辑回归分析确定了对解决收入不平等问题态度的几个关键决定因素。研究结果表明,物质福利、生活满意度、机构信任、工作地位、居住地、教育水平和宗教信仰等因素在塑造个人对收入不平等的看法方面发挥着重要作用,特别是在支持再分配政策或支持自由市场资本主义作为缓解收入差距的潜在解决方案的背景下。此外,宏观层面的变量揭示了对收入平等支持的实质性影响。研究发现,人均收入、前10名的收入份额、失业率以及女性在议会中的代表性(性别平等的代表)显著增加了支持减少收入不平等努力的可能性。在控制其他与收入相关的变量时,我们的结果仍然稳健。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
EGE ACADEMIC REVIEW
EGE ACADEMIC REVIEW ECONOMICS-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信