An analysis of the National Water Model for a mid-Atlantic suburban watershed

IF 1.1 4区 地球科学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Saber E. Brasher, Daniel J. Leathers, Christina L. Callahan, Kathryn E. Giesa
{"title":"An analysis of the National Water Model for a mid-Atlantic suburban watershed","authors":"Saber E. Brasher, Daniel J. Leathers, Christina L. Callahan, Kathryn E. Giesa","doi":"10.1080/02723646.2023.2260546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTDischarge values from the National Water Model (NWM) were compared to USGS stream gage discharge observations for the suburban Red Clay Creek watershed (drainage area ~140 km2 and mixed land-use), in Pennsylvania and Delaware, from 2016 to 2018. 18-hour retrospective simulations from the NWM were used with concurrent hourly USGS discharge observations from three locations along the Red Clay Creek. Results indicate that the mean of discharge estimates from the NWM and from USGS observations significantly differed and that the NWM generally underestimates low-flow conditions and overestimates high-flow conditions. Watershed size also impacted NWM performance (with performance degrading in smaller watersheds). A meteorological analysis determined that convective rainfall events were associated with 66% of the largest differences between NWM discharge estimates and USGS observations while mid-latitude cyclone stratiform precipitation events accounted for the other 34%. Lastly, of the largest 15 differences between the NWM and observations, 13 occurred with pre-cursor soil moisture that was below the mean (dry soil conditions), in conjunction with heavy rainfall. Given the NWM’s recent operational implementation, and its status as Prototype guidance, the results of this study present specific geographical and climatological findings that can aid in the NWM’s continued validation and improvement for similar regions.KEYWORDS: National water modelstreamflowmid-atlanticwatershed analysisClimatewater Resources AcknowledgmentsThe authors would like to thank the anonymous peer reviewers for their suggestions as well as Kevin Brinson and Chris Hughes for their helpful comments whilst revising this manuscript for publication.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Data availability statementThe authors confirm that data used for this research are publicly available and can be accessed by the links and references provided.Additional informationFundingThis publication was made possible by the National Science Foundation EPSCoR Grant No. 1757353 and the State of Delaware.","PeriodicalId":54618,"journal":{"name":"Physical Geography","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Geography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02723646.2023.2260546","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTDischarge values from the National Water Model (NWM) were compared to USGS stream gage discharge observations for the suburban Red Clay Creek watershed (drainage area ~140 km2 and mixed land-use), in Pennsylvania and Delaware, from 2016 to 2018. 18-hour retrospective simulations from the NWM were used with concurrent hourly USGS discharge observations from three locations along the Red Clay Creek. Results indicate that the mean of discharge estimates from the NWM and from USGS observations significantly differed and that the NWM generally underestimates low-flow conditions and overestimates high-flow conditions. Watershed size also impacted NWM performance (with performance degrading in smaller watersheds). A meteorological analysis determined that convective rainfall events were associated with 66% of the largest differences between NWM discharge estimates and USGS observations while mid-latitude cyclone stratiform precipitation events accounted for the other 34%. Lastly, of the largest 15 differences between the NWM and observations, 13 occurred with pre-cursor soil moisture that was below the mean (dry soil conditions), in conjunction with heavy rainfall. Given the NWM’s recent operational implementation, and its status as Prototype guidance, the results of this study present specific geographical and climatological findings that can aid in the NWM’s continued validation and improvement for similar regions.KEYWORDS: National water modelstreamflowmid-atlanticwatershed analysisClimatewater Resources AcknowledgmentsThe authors would like to thank the anonymous peer reviewers for their suggestions as well as Kevin Brinson and Chris Hughes for their helpful comments whilst revising this manuscript for publication.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Data availability statementThe authors confirm that data used for this research are publicly available and can be accessed by the links and references provided.Additional informationFundingThis publication was made possible by the National Science Foundation EPSCoR Grant No. 1757353 and the State of Delaware.
国家水模型对大西洋中部郊区流域的分析
2016 - 2018年,美国国家水模型(NWM)与美国地质勘探局(USGS)在宾夕法尼亚州和特拉华州郊区红泥溪流域(流域面积约140 km2,混合土地利用)的流量测量值进行了比较。NWM的18小时回顾性模拟与美国地质勘探局在红粘土河沿岸三个地点的每小时流量观测同时使用。结果表明,NWM估算的流量均值与USGS观测值存在显著差异,NWM普遍低估了低流量条件,高估了高流量条件。流域规模也影响了西北流域的性能(在较小的流域中性能下降)。一项气象分析确定,对流降雨事件与NWM流量估算和USGS观测之间最大差异的66%有关,而中纬度气旋层状降水事件占另外34%。最后,在NWM和观测值之间最大的15个差异中,有13个发生在暴雨前土壤湿度低于平均值(土壤干燥)的情况下。鉴于NWM最近的业务实施及其作为原型指导的地位,本研究的结果提出了具体的地理和气候学发现,可以帮助NWM在类似地区继续验证和改进。关键词:国家水模型流流大西洋中部流域分析气候水资源致谢作者感谢匿名同行审稿人的建议以及凯文·布林森和克里斯·休斯在修改本手稿以供出版时提供的有益意见。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。数据可用性声明作者确认本研究使用的数据是公开的,可以通过提供的链接和参考文献访问。本出版物由美国国家科学基金会EPSCoR资助号1757353和特拉华州资助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physical Geography
Physical Geography 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Physical Geography disseminates significant research in the environmental sciences, including research that integrates environmental processes and human activities. It publishes original papers devoted to research in climatology, geomorphology, hydrology, biogeography, soil science, human-environment interactions, and research methods in physical geography, and welcomes original contributions on topics at the intersection of two or more of these categories.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信