A Systematic Analysis of Problems in Open Collaborative Data Engineering

Philip Heltweg, Dirk Riehle
{"title":"A Systematic Analysis of Problems in Open Collaborative Data Engineering","authors":"Philip Heltweg, Dirk Riehle","doi":"10.1145/3629040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Collaborative workflows are common in open-source software development. They reduce individual costs and improve the quality of work results. Open data shares many characteristics with open-source software as it can be used, modified, and redistributed by anyone, for free. However, in contrast to open-source software engineering, collaborative data engineering on open data lacks a shared understanding of processes, methods, and tools. This article presents a systematic literature review of collaboration processes, methods, and tools in data engineering as performed by open data users. An additional interview study with practitioners confirms and enhances the findings and strengthens the resulting insights. We find an ecosystem with heterogeneous participants and no standardized processes, methods, and tools. Participants face a variety of technical and social challenges during their work. Our work provides a structured overview of collaboration systems in open collaborative data engineering, enabling further research. Additionally, we contribute preliminary guidelines for successful open collaborative data engineering projects and recommendations to increase its adoption for open data ecosystems.","PeriodicalId":486759,"journal":{"name":"ACM transactions on social computing","volume":"23 12","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM transactions on social computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3629040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Collaborative workflows are common in open-source software development. They reduce individual costs and improve the quality of work results. Open data shares many characteristics with open-source software as it can be used, modified, and redistributed by anyone, for free. However, in contrast to open-source software engineering, collaborative data engineering on open data lacks a shared understanding of processes, methods, and tools. This article presents a systematic literature review of collaboration processes, methods, and tools in data engineering as performed by open data users. An additional interview study with practitioners confirms and enhances the findings and strengthens the resulting insights. We find an ecosystem with heterogeneous participants and no standardized processes, methods, and tools. Participants face a variety of technical and social challenges during their work. Our work provides a structured overview of collaboration systems in open collaborative data engineering, enabling further research. Additionally, we contribute preliminary guidelines for successful open collaborative data engineering projects and recommendations to increase its adoption for open data ecosystems.
开放协同数据工程问题的系统分析
协作工作流在开源软件开发中很常见。它们降低了个人成本,提高了工作结果的质量。开放数据与开源软件共享许多特性,因为任何人都可以免费使用、修改和重新分发开放数据。然而,与开源软件工程相比,基于开放数据的协作数据工程缺乏对过程、方法和工具的共同理解。本文对开放数据用户执行的数据工程中的协作过程、方法和工具进行了系统的文献综述。另一项与从业人员的访谈研究证实并加强了研究结果,并加强了由此产生的见解。我们发现这个生态系统的参与者是异质的,没有标准化的过程、方法和工具。参与者在工作中面临各种各样的技术和社会挑战。我们的工作为开放协作数据工程中的协作系统提供了一个结构化的概述,使进一步的研究成为可能。此外,我们还为成功的开放协作数据工程项目提供了初步指导方针,并提出了增加开放数据生态系统采用的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信