Comparison of the Effectiveness of Interpersonal Counseling and Interpersonal Psychotherapy in Emotional Expression, Social Skills, and Depression Symptoms in Students

IF 0.5 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
Javad Nezafat Ferizi, Ahmad Ashouri, Banafsheh Gharraee, Ali Asghar Asgharnejad Farid
{"title":"Comparison of the Effectiveness of Interpersonal Counseling and Interpersonal Psychotherapy in Emotional Expression, Social Skills, and Depression Symptoms in Students","authors":"Javad Nezafat Ferizi, Ahmad Ashouri, Banafsheh Gharraee, Ali Asghar Asgharnejad Farid","doi":"10.5812/ijpbs-130443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Depression symptoms are among the most common psychological problems in students. Short-term treatments are important in preventing depression from turning into a disorder. Objectives: The current study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of interpersonal counseling (IPC) in depression symptoms, emotional expression, and social skills of students in comparison to interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT). Methods: A pretest and posttest design with follow-up was used in this study, with two experimental groups and a control group conducted in Mashhad, Iran, in 2021. A total of 51 subjects who scored 14 or higher on the Beck Depression Inventory-Second Edition (BDI-II) were randomly assigned to two experimental and control groups. Finally, the information obtained from 41 subjects was analyzed. The experimental groups underwent 7 sessions of 45 minutes of IPC and 12 sessions of 90 minutes of IPT every week. At the beginning of the study, after the end of the intervention, and after one- and three-month follow-up periods, all the subjects were evaluated with the BDI-II, emotional expressiveness, and social skills questionnaires. The findings were analyzed using the repeated measurement method and Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests. All the analyses were carried out with SPSS software (version 23). Results: Both IPC and IPT treatments were effective in depression symptoms (M: 31.76, 20.41, 22.94, and 24), emotional expression (M: 32.94, 40.26, 38.47, and 37.23), and social skills (M: 224.9, 265.2, 254.4, and 253.7) (P < 0.05). The comparison of the two treatments showed no significant difference in the variables (P > 0.05). Conclusions: The findings of the present study can be considered a useful step in the field of short-term and effective interventions.","PeriodicalId":46644,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences","volume":"76 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/ijpbs-130443","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Depression symptoms are among the most common psychological problems in students. Short-term treatments are important in preventing depression from turning into a disorder. Objectives: The current study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of interpersonal counseling (IPC) in depression symptoms, emotional expression, and social skills of students in comparison to interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT). Methods: A pretest and posttest design with follow-up was used in this study, with two experimental groups and a control group conducted in Mashhad, Iran, in 2021. A total of 51 subjects who scored 14 or higher on the Beck Depression Inventory-Second Edition (BDI-II) were randomly assigned to two experimental and control groups. Finally, the information obtained from 41 subjects was analyzed. The experimental groups underwent 7 sessions of 45 minutes of IPC and 12 sessions of 90 minutes of IPT every week. At the beginning of the study, after the end of the intervention, and after one- and three-month follow-up periods, all the subjects were evaluated with the BDI-II, emotional expressiveness, and social skills questionnaires. The findings were analyzed using the repeated measurement method and Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests. All the analyses were carried out with SPSS software (version 23). Results: Both IPC and IPT treatments were effective in depression symptoms (M: 31.76, 20.41, 22.94, and 24), emotional expression (M: 32.94, 40.26, 38.47, and 37.23), and social skills (M: 224.9, 265.2, 254.4, and 253.7) (P < 0.05). The comparison of the two treatments showed no significant difference in the variables (P > 0.05). Conclusions: The findings of the present study can be considered a useful step in the field of short-term and effective interventions.
人际咨询与人际心理治疗对学生情绪表达、社交技能及抑郁症状的影响比较
背景:抑郁症状是学生最常见的心理问题之一。短期治疗对于防止抑郁症发展成一种疾病很重要。目的:本研究旨在探讨人际心理咨询(IPC)与人际心理治疗(IPT)在大学生抑郁症状、情绪表达和社交技能方面的效果。方法:本研究采用前测和后测设计并随访,于2021年在伊朗马什哈德进行两个实验组和一个对照组。51名贝克抑郁量表第二版(BDI-II)得分在14分及以上的受试者被随机分为实验组和对照组。最后,对41名受试者的信息进行分析。实验组每周进行7次45分钟的IPC和12次90分钟的IPT。在研究开始时、干预结束后以及1个月和3个月的随访期后,所有受试者都接受了BDI-II、情绪表达能力和社交技能问卷的评估。使用重复测量法和Kruskal-Wallis和Mann-Whitney U检验对结果进行分析。所有分析均使用SPSS软件(版本23)进行。结果:IPC和IPT治疗对抑郁症状(M值分别为31.76、20.41、22.94和24)、情绪表达(M值分别为32.94、40.26、38.47和37.23)和社交技能(M值分别为224.9、265.2、254.4和253.7)均有效(P <0.05)。两种处理比较,各变量P >0.05)。结论:本研究的结果可被认为是短期有效干预领域的有益步骤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
10.00%
发文量
70
期刊介绍: The Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (IJPBS) is an international quarterly peer-reviewed journal which is aimed at promoting communication among researchers worldwide and welcomes contributions from authors in all areas of psychiatry, psychology, and behavioral sciences. The journal publishes original contributions that have not previously been submitted for publication elsewhere. Manuscripts are received with the understanding that they are submitted solely to the IJPBS. Upon submission, they become the property of the Publisher and that the data in the manuscript have been reviewed by all authors, who agree to the analysis of the data and the conclusions reached in the manuscript. The Publisher reserves copyright and renewal on all published material and such material may not be reproduced without the written permission of the Publisher. Statements in articles are the responsibility of the authors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信