Joshua Ofori-Amanfo, Godfred Matthew Yaw Owusu, Felix Kwasi Arku
{"title":"Twenty-one years of the <i>Journal of Public Procurement</i>: a performance and content review using bibliometric analysis","authors":"Joshua Ofori-Amanfo, Godfred Matthew Yaw Owusu, Felix Kwasi Arku","doi":"10.1108/jopp-12-2022-0057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose The purpose of this study is to provide a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of publications in the Journal of Public Procurement ( JoPP ) from 2001 to 2021. The study provides insights into trends in publications, prominent publication themes, influential authors, institutions and countries that have prominently been associated with the journal’s journey. Design/methodology/approach The study used a bibliometric and content analysis approach using the VOSviewer software to develop insights into the trends, structures and patterns in publications in the journal. Data for the study was extracted from the Scopus and Google Scholar databases. Findings The study established that there has been consistent growth in the number of papers published by the journal within the last two decades. Yearly average publication by the journal stood at 14 papers between 2002 and 2009, with the annual average rising to approximately 18 papers between 2010 and 2021. The trend in publication has been established and identified the influential citations and contributors to the journal. The study has also clustered out the thematic structures in journal’s publications. The prominent and emerging research issues in the public procurement environment needing immediate research attention have been highlighted. Research limitations/implications The study is a one-journal bibliometric analysis and subsequently ignores publications on public procurement from other journals. Social implications The findings of this study highlight to the research community the contributions of JoPP to the public procurement discourse and present important avenues for future research agenda. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is the first bibliometric study for the JoPP , providing detailed bibliometric indexes of the 21-year period of the journal’s publications. The study comprehensively analyses the contributions in the JoPP to assess the trend and scope in publications in the field of public procurement and draws attention to emerging concerns and critical issues of neglect requiring research attention in the journal.","PeriodicalId":45136,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Procurement","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Procurement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jopp-12-2022-0057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this study is to provide a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of publications in the Journal of Public Procurement ( JoPP ) from 2001 to 2021. The study provides insights into trends in publications, prominent publication themes, influential authors, institutions and countries that have prominently been associated with the journal’s journey. Design/methodology/approach The study used a bibliometric and content analysis approach using the VOSviewer software to develop insights into the trends, structures and patterns in publications in the journal. Data for the study was extracted from the Scopus and Google Scholar databases. Findings The study established that there has been consistent growth in the number of papers published by the journal within the last two decades. Yearly average publication by the journal stood at 14 papers between 2002 and 2009, with the annual average rising to approximately 18 papers between 2010 and 2021. The trend in publication has been established and identified the influential citations and contributors to the journal. The study has also clustered out the thematic structures in journal’s publications. The prominent and emerging research issues in the public procurement environment needing immediate research attention have been highlighted. Research limitations/implications The study is a one-journal bibliometric analysis and subsequently ignores publications on public procurement from other journals. Social implications The findings of this study highlight to the research community the contributions of JoPP to the public procurement discourse and present important avenues for future research agenda. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is the first bibliometric study for the JoPP , providing detailed bibliometric indexes of the 21-year period of the journal’s publications. The study comprehensively analyses the contributions in the JoPP to assess the trend and scope in publications in the field of public procurement and draws attention to emerging concerns and critical issues of neglect requiring research attention in the journal.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Public Procurement (JOPP) seeks to further the understanding of public procurement. JOPP publishes original, high-quality research that explores the theories and practices of public procurement. The journal ensures that high-quality research is collected and disseminated widely to both academics and practitioners, and provides a forum for debate. It covers all subjects relating to the purchase of goods, services and works by public organizations at a local, regional, national and international level. JOPP is multi-disciplinary, with a broad approach towards methods and styles of research as well as the level of issues addressed. The Journal welcomes the submission of papers from researchers internationally. The journal welcomes research papers, narrative essays, exemplar cases, forums, and book reviews.