Managing unwarranted variation in hospital care – findings from a regional audit in Norway

H. P. Eide, P. Barach, E. Søreide, C. Thoresen, O. Tjomsland
{"title":"Managing unwarranted variation in hospital care – findings from a regional audit in Norway","authors":"H. P. Eide, P. Barach, E. Søreide, C. Thoresen, O. Tjomsland","doi":"10.1007/s43999-023-00033-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background/Aim There has been increasing focus and research over the past decades on defining, identifying, visualizing and reducing unwarranted clinical variation in clinical practice. Both clinician-driven initiatives such as the US based “Choosing Wisely” campaign and the top-down driven “Evidence-based intervention programme (EBI)” launched by NHS UK to improve quality of care by reducing unnecessary interventions have shown marginal results. We present the findings from a mixed-methods audit performed to evaluate the compliance by senior hospital leaders of a new regional strategy to reduce unwarranted variation in outcomes and utilization rates. Methods Seventy-five mid- to senior-division and department leaders from eight hospital trusts in South-Eastern Norway Regional Trust (HSO) were invited to participate in evaluating the response and compliance of the regional leadership strategy for reducing unwarranted variation in patient outcomes and service utilization rates. Results The audit revealed that the aim of reducing unwanted variation was not clearly communicated by senior HSO management. There was varying use of data from the national quality registers and health atlases for quality improvement. One third of the clinical leaders reported a lack of scrutiny of their work and were insufficiently aware of the HSO’s top-management and the hospital’s Boards strategic expectations about the importance of reducing unwarranted variation in their hospital utilization. Conclusions We found that the strategic aim of reducing unwanted clinical variation was not clearly communicated by senior HSO management to hospital boards and senior management. The hospitals could benefit from a better understanding of causes of variation by strengthening their efforts to reduce unwarranted variation in utilization rates as a key element in improving health care quality and patient safety. The findings of the audit are relevant for other healthcare organizations trying to improve their quality and reduce unnecessary variation.","PeriodicalId":220051,"journal":{"name":"Research in Health Services & Regions","volume":"2 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Health Services & Regions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43999-023-00033-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Background/Aim There has been increasing focus and research over the past decades on defining, identifying, visualizing and reducing unwarranted clinical variation in clinical practice. Both clinician-driven initiatives such as the US based “Choosing Wisely” campaign and the top-down driven “Evidence-based intervention programme (EBI)” launched by NHS UK to improve quality of care by reducing unnecessary interventions have shown marginal results. We present the findings from a mixed-methods audit performed to evaluate the compliance by senior hospital leaders of a new regional strategy to reduce unwarranted variation in outcomes and utilization rates. Methods Seventy-five mid- to senior-division and department leaders from eight hospital trusts in South-Eastern Norway Regional Trust (HSO) were invited to participate in evaluating the response and compliance of the regional leadership strategy for reducing unwarranted variation in patient outcomes and service utilization rates. Results The audit revealed that the aim of reducing unwanted variation was not clearly communicated by senior HSO management. There was varying use of data from the national quality registers and health atlases for quality improvement. One third of the clinical leaders reported a lack of scrutiny of their work and were insufficiently aware of the HSO’s top-management and the hospital’s Boards strategic expectations about the importance of reducing unwarranted variation in their hospital utilization. Conclusions We found that the strategic aim of reducing unwanted clinical variation was not clearly communicated by senior HSO management to hospital boards and senior management. The hospitals could benefit from a better understanding of causes of variation by strengthening their efforts to reduce unwarranted variation in utilization rates as a key element in improving health care quality and patient safety. The findings of the audit are relevant for other healthcare organizations trying to improve their quality and reduce unnecessary variation.
管理医院护理中不合理的变化——挪威区域审计的结果
背景/目的在过去的几十年里,人们越来越关注和研究如何定义、识别、可视化和减少临床实践中不必要的临床变异。临床医生主导的项目,如美国的“明智选择”运动,以及英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS UK)发起的自上而下的“循证干预项目(EBI)”,通过减少不必要的干预来提高医疗质量,结果都微乎其微。我们提出了一项混合方法审计的结果,以评估高级医院领导对一项新的区域战略的遵守情况,以减少结果和利用率的不必要变化。方法邀请东南挪威地区信托(HSO) 8家医院信托的75名中高级科室和科室领导参与评估区域领导策略的响应和依从性,以减少患者预后和服务利用率的不必要变化。结果审计发现,HSO高层管理人员没有明确传达减少不必要变化的目标。为了提高质量,对国家质量登记册和卫生地图集数据的使用情况各不相同。三分之一的临床负责人报告说,缺乏对他们工作的审查,并且没有充分认识到HSO的高层管理人员和医院董事会对减少医院利用中不必要变化的重要性的战略期望。结论:我们发现HSO高层管理人员没有向医院董事会和高层管理人员明确传达减少不必要的临床变异的战略目标。医院可以从更好地了解差异的原因中受益,加强努力减少利用率方面的不必要差异,将其作为提高保健质量和患者安全的关键因素。审计的结果与其他试图提高质量和减少不必要变化的医疗保健组织相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信