Country-specific roadmaps for scaling up integrated care in Belgium, Slovenia, and Cambodia - Lessons learned from the SCUBY project

Martin Heine, Monika Martens, Daniel Boateng, Grace Marie Ku, Roy Remmen, Edwin Wouters, Srean Chhim, Antonjia Poplas Susič, Wim van Damme, Josefien van Olmen, Kerstin Klipstein-Grobusch, on behalf of the SCUBY consortium
{"title":"Country-specific roadmaps for scaling up integrated care in Belgium, Slovenia, and Cambodia - Lessons learned from the SCUBY project","authors":"Martin Heine, Monika Martens, Daniel Boateng, Grace Marie Ku, Roy Remmen, Edwin Wouters, Srean Chhim, Antonjia Poplas Susič, Wim van Damme, Josefien van Olmen, Kerstin Klipstein-Grobusch, on behalf of the SCUBY consortium","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-3585711/v1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Introduction The SCUBY project aimed to provide knowledge on the scaling-up of an Integrated Care Package (ICP) for type 2 diabetes and hypertension across three distinct health systems (Cambodia, Slovenia, and Belgium). Here, we analyse the different elements of the country-specific scale-up roadmaps to identify similarities and differences, and share lessons learned. Methods Thematic analysis was used to derive crucial roadmap elements from key SCUBY documents (n = 20), including policy briefs, interim reports, research outputs, and consortium meeting notes. Results Roadmap elements differed according to priority needs, features of the (health) systems, and partly reflected the position of the SCUBY research team within each country. Common cross-country elements were: task-shifting to patients themselves, nurses and community health workers; strengthening monitoring and evaluation; and creating an enabling environment for ICP implementation. Discussion Scale-up of complex interventions requires continuous engagement of multiple stakeholders and contextualization of action plans. The linkage of research teams with key implementation stakeholders and policy makers creates change-teams, allowing advancement from formative research to implementation of roadmap strategies and full scale-up in due time. Conclusion The development processes and contents of the roadmaps provided essential and reciprocal learnings. These help shape future policy dialogues and best practices to tackle chronic disease in each participating country.","PeriodicalId":500086,"journal":{"name":"Research Square (Research Square)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Square (Research Square)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3585711/v1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Introduction The SCUBY project aimed to provide knowledge on the scaling-up of an Integrated Care Package (ICP) for type 2 diabetes and hypertension across three distinct health systems (Cambodia, Slovenia, and Belgium). Here, we analyse the different elements of the country-specific scale-up roadmaps to identify similarities and differences, and share lessons learned. Methods Thematic analysis was used to derive crucial roadmap elements from key SCUBY documents (n = 20), including policy briefs, interim reports, research outputs, and consortium meeting notes. Results Roadmap elements differed according to priority needs, features of the (health) systems, and partly reflected the position of the SCUBY research team within each country. Common cross-country elements were: task-shifting to patients themselves, nurses and community health workers; strengthening monitoring and evaluation; and creating an enabling environment for ICP implementation. Discussion Scale-up of complex interventions requires continuous engagement of multiple stakeholders and contextualization of action plans. The linkage of research teams with key implementation stakeholders and policy makers creates change-teams, allowing advancement from formative research to implementation of roadmap strategies and full scale-up in due time. Conclusion The development processes and contents of the roadmaps provided essential and reciprocal learnings. These help shape future policy dialogues and best practices to tackle chronic disease in each participating country.
比利时、斯洛文尼亚和柬埔寨扩大综合护理的国别路线图——SCUBY项目的经验教训
SCUBY项目旨在提供关于在三个不同的卫生系统(柬埔寨、斯洛文尼亚和比利时)扩大2型糖尿病和高血压综合护理包(ICP)的知识。在此,我们分析了具体国家扩大规模路线图的不同要素,以确定相似性和差异,并分享经验教训。方法采用专题分析方法,从关键SCUBY文件(n = 20)中提取关键路线图元素,包括政策简报、中期报告、研究成果和联盟会议记录。路线图要素根据优先需求和(卫生)系统的特点而有所不同,并部分反映了SCUBY研究小组在每个国家的地位。常见的跨国因素有:任务转移给病人自己、护士和社区卫生工作者;加强监测和评价;为实施ICP创造有利的环境。扩大复杂干预措施需要多个利益攸关方的持续参与和行动计划的背景化。研究团队与关键实施利益相关者和政策制定者的联系创建了变革团队,允许从形成性研究推进到路线图战略的实施,并在适当的时候全面扩大规模。结论路线图的制定过程和内容提供了必要和相互借鉴的经验。这些有助于形成未来的政策对话和最佳做法,以应对每个参与国的慢性病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信