Attitudes Coded as Measures of Determining Students’ Performance in Mathematics

{"title":"Attitudes Coded as Measures of Determining Students’ Performance in Mathematics","authors":"","doi":"10.57125/fed.2023.12.25.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The poor performance is even a major problem in rural areas, hindering a country’s economic competitiveness and development of human capital. In the school classroom, mathematics students lack the needed culture to read, understand, perform and apply tasks associated with the tasks. The aim of this study was to explore the various attitudes that measured students’ performance and find relationships among the factors. Exploring the pragmatic paradigm, the researchers used the descriptive design involving structured questionnaire of four-point Likert scale. This scale suitably combined both purposive and simple random sampling procedures to select 315 participants. The instrument was structured as Strongly Agree, Agree, Disagree and Strongly Disagree to simplify responses and yield faster and higher retrieve rate. Immediately after the data collection, the responses were coded in closed form to ease data analysis. Having perused many tools of data analysis, the researchers came to the conclusion that a combination of Pearson Product Moment Correlation Coefficient, T-test, means, standard deviation and percentages were the most appropriate. While means, standard deviations and percentages were mostly used to determine the attitudes, Pearson Product Correlation Coefficient explored the relationships among the various variables. Consequently, the results revealed that the positive attitudes of parents, teachers and schools influenced students’ performance in mathematics. In fact, nearly 94% of the respondents’ attribute mathematics attitudes to parents and closed to 95% attributed mathematics success to teachers. There were also positive relationships among parents, teachers and school environment in determining students’ performance in mathematics. This means students with positive attitudes towards mathematics outperformed those with negative attitudes. It is recommended that parents, teachers and school heads thrive towards minimizing negative attitudes and rather maximising positive attitudes into school mathematics. We suggested that any replication of a future study should include private schools.","PeriodicalId":491042,"journal":{"name":"Futurity Education","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Futurity Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.57125/fed.2023.12.25.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The poor performance is even a major problem in rural areas, hindering a country’s economic competitiveness and development of human capital. In the school classroom, mathematics students lack the needed culture to read, understand, perform and apply tasks associated with the tasks. The aim of this study was to explore the various attitudes that measured students’ performance and find relationships among the factors. Exploring the pragmatic paradigm, the researchers used the descriptive design involving structured questionnaire of four-point Likert scale. This scale suitably combined both purposive and simple random sampling procedures to select 315 participants. The instrument was structured as Strongly Agree, Agree, Disagree and Strongly Disagree to simplify responses and yield faster and higher retrieve rate. Immediately after the data collection, the responses were coded in closed form to ease data analysis. Having perused many tools of data analysis, the researchers came to the conclusion that a combination of Pearson Product Moment Correlation Coefficient, T-test, means, standard deviation and percentages were the most appropriate. While means, standard deviations and percentages were mostly used to determine the attitudes, Pearson Product Correlation Coefficient explored the relationships among the various variables. Consequently, the results revealed that the positive attitudes of parents, teachers and schools influenced students’ performance in mathematics. In fact, nearly 94% of the respondents’ attribute mathematics attitudes to parents and closed to 95% attributed mathematics success to teachers. There were also positive relationships among parents, teachers and school environment in determining students’ performance in mathematics. This means students with positive attitudes towards mathematics outperformed those with negative attitudes. It is recommended that parents, teachers and school heads thrive towards minimizing negative attitudes and rather maximising positive attitudes into school mathematics. We suggested that any replication of a future study should include private schools.
态度编码是决定学生数学成绩的措施
这种不佳的表现甚至是农村地区的一个主要问题,阻碍了一个国家的经济竞争力和人力资本的发展。在学校的课堂上,数学学生缺乏阅读、理解、执行和应用与任务相关的任务所需的文化。本研究的目的是探讨衡量学生表现的各种态度,并找出因素之间的关系。研究人员采用描述性设计,采用李克特四分制结构化问卷,探索语用范式。该量表将有目的抽样和简单随机抽样相结合,选择了315名参与者。该工具的结构为强烈同意、同意、不同意和强烈不同意,以简化响应并产生更快和更高的检索率。数据收集后,立即以封闭形式对响应进行编码,以方便数据分析。在仔细研究了许多数据分析工具后,研究人员得出结论,Pearson积差相关系数、t检验、均值、标准差和百分比的组合是最合适的。虽然平均数、标准差和百分比主要用于确定态度,但皮尔逊产品相关系数探讨了各种变量之间的关系。结果表明,家长、教师和学校的积极态度影响了学生的数学成绩。事实上,近94%的受访者将数学态度归因于父母,近95%的受访者将数学的成功归因于教师。家长、教师和学校环境对学生的数学成绩也有正相关的影响。这意味着对数学持积极态度的学生比持消极态度的学生表现得更好。建议家长、老师和学校校长尽量减少消极态度,而尽量增加对学校数学的积极态度。我们建议未来研究的任何复制都应包括私立学校。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信