Examining Online International Health Professions Education: A Mixed Methods Review of Barriers, Facilitators, and Early Outcomes

Q2 Health Professions
Laura R Dell'Aiera, David Fitzgerald, David Fisher, Norman Gill
{"title":"Examining Online International Health Professions Education: A Mixed Methods Review of Barriers, Facilitators, and Early Outcomes","authors":"Laura R Dell'Aiera, David Fitzgerald, David Fisher, Norman Gill","doi":"10.1051/ject/2023044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Access to quality healthcare education across the world is disproportionate. This study explores the potential for health professions education to be delivered online to reach international students. Methods Exploratory mixed methods were used to identify the barriers, facilitators, and early outcomes of online international health professions education. Results Qualitative analysis yielded four primary and nine subthemes. Multiple interventions were implemented in the planning of a novel online international Extracorporeal Science (ECS) program based on these themes. Quantitative data from the first semester of the ECS program was collected along with data from the traditional entry-level program and historic data from previous entry-level cohorts. No significant correlations or differences were found between students. Student satisfaction surveys were determined to be equivalent for each group. Mixed data analysis revealed exceptional student satisfaction in areas where qualitative feedback was incorporated in the program design. Conclusions Online international education may be a viable option in the health professions. Barriers and facilitators to this mode of education were identified and utilized in designing one such program. Early outcomes from the novel ECS program reveal that the student performance and satisfaction are equivalent to those of a traditional in-person training program.","PeriodicalId":39644,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Extra-Corporeal Technology","volume":"4 11","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Extra-Corporeal Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/ject/2023044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Access to quality healthcare education across the world is disproportionate. This study explores the potential for health professions education to be delivered online to reach international students. Methods Exploratory mixed methods were used to identify the barriers, facilitators, and early outcomes of online international health professions education. Results Qualitative analysis yielded four primary and nine subthemes. Multiple interventions were implemented in the planning of a novel online international Extracorporeal Science (ECS) program based on these themes. Quantitative data from the first semester of the ECS program was collected along with data from the traditional entry-level program and historic data from previous entry-level cohorts. No significant correlations or differences were found between students. Student satisfaction surveys were determined to be equivalent for each group. Mixed data analysis revealed exceptional student satisfaction in areas where qualitative feedback was incorporated in the program design. Conclusions Online international education may be a viable option in the health professions. Barriers and facilitators to this mode of education were identified and utilized in designing one such program. Early outcomes from the novel ECS program reveal that the student performance and satisfaction are equivalent to those of a traditional in-person training program.
检查在线国际卫生专业教育:障碍、促进因素和早期结果的混合方法综述
世界各地获得高质量医疗保健教育的机会不成比例。本研究探讨了在线提供卫生专业教育以吸引国际学生的潜力。方法采用探索性混合方法确定在线国际卫生职业教育的障碍、促进因素和早期结果。结果定性分析得出4个主要主题和9个次要主题。在基于这些主题的新型在线国际体外科学(ECS)计划的规划中实施了多种干预措施。收集了ECS项目第一学期的定量数据,以及传统入门级项目的数据和以前入门级队列的历史数据。学生之间没有发现显著的相关性或差异。学生满意度调查被确定为每个组是相同的。混合数据分析显示,在课程设计中纳入定性反馈的领域,学生的满意度很高。结论在线国际教育可能是卫生专业的一个可行选择。这种教育模式的障碍和促进因素被识别出来,并在设计这样一个项目时加以利用。新颖的ECS项目的早期结果表明,学生的表现和满意度与传统的面对面培训项目相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Extra-Corporeal Technology
Journal of Extra-Corporeal Technology Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: The Journal of Extracorporeal Technology is dedicated to the study and practice of Basic Science and Clinical issues related to extracorporeal circulation. Areas emphasized in the Journal include: •Cardiopulmonary Bypass •Cardiac Surgery •Cardiovascular Anesthesia •Hematology •Blood Management •Physiology •Fluid Dynamics •Laboratory Science •Coagulation and Hematology •Transfusion •Business Practices •Pediatric Perfusion •Total Quality Management • Evidence-Based Practices
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信