{"title":"IMAGE OF THE CHILD IN SLOVENIAN CHILDREN’S LITERATURE","authors":"Milena Mileva Blažič, Arburim Iseni","doi":"10.58885/ijllis.v12i5.30mb","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Period of childhood is supposed to be protected period. Adults are supposed to act for the benefit of the child, but reality shows us this is often not the case. Even the etymology of the word ‘child’ in Slovene (France Bezlaj, Marko Snoj) is showing the disparity in understanding of the word ‘child’ and of the real understanding of the child. On the basis of the etymological analyses of the word ‘child’ in the Bezlaj’s dictionary and in Snoj’s dictionary, we can say that the word appears the most often under the meaning of worker, farmhand, page, servant, slave, serf, and less as a boy, nipper, youngster, man, little boy. The absence of the mentioning of feminine child is self-explanatory.</p><p><strong>Keywords:</strong> child, Slovenian children’s literature, sunny childhood, cloudy childhood, idealization, romanticism, image of the child.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":490798,"journal":{"name":"ANGLISTICUM Journal of the Association-Institute for English Language and American Studies","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ANGLISTICUM Journal of the Association-Institute for English Language and American Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58885/ijllis.v12i5.30mb","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Period of childhood is supposed to be protected period. Adults are supposed to act for the benefit of the child, but reality shows us this is often not the case. Even the etymology of the word ‘child’ in Slovene (France Bezlaj, Marko Snoj) is showing the disparity in understanding of the word ‘child’ and of the real understanding of the child. On the basis of the etymological analyses of the word ‘child’ in the Bezlaj’s dictionary and in Snoj’s dictionary, we can say that the word appears the most often under the meaning of worker, farmhand, page, servant, slave, serf, and less as a boy, nipper, youngster, man, little boy. The absence of the mentioning of feminine child is self-explanatory.
Keywords: child, Slovenian children’s literature, sunny childhood, cloudy childhood, idealization, romanticism, image of the child.
<div>< >童年时期应该是受保护的时期。成年人应该为孩子的利益而行动,但现实告诉我们,情况往往并非如此。甚至在斯洛文尼亚,“孩子”这个词的词源(France Bezlaj, Marko Snoj)也显示出对“孩子”这个词的理解与对孩子的真正理解之间的差异。根据Bezlaj和Snoj的词典对“孩子”一词的词源分析,我们可以说,这个词最常出现在工人、农场工人、page、仆人、奴隶、农奴的意思下,而较少出现在男孩、小男孩、年轻人、男人、小男孩的意思下。关键词:</strong>儿童,斯洛文尼亚儿童文学,阳光明媚的童年,阴天的童年,理想化,浪漫主义,儿童形象。</p></div>