Development of Mathematics E-Module Using Kodular and Flipbook for Junior High School Students: Differences

Tri Nova Hasti Yunianta, Tatang Herman, Banu Al Wizhar, Muhammad Al Falah Kurniawan
{"title":"Development of Mathematics E-Module Using Kodular and Flipbook for Junior High School Students: Differences","authors":"Tri Nova Hasti Yunianta, Tatang Herman, Banu Al Wizhar, Muhammad Al Falah Kurniawan","doi":"10.24815/jdm.v10i1.29730","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To develop media such as e-modules, a comprehensive understanding of the applications used to create them is necessary. It is essential to comprehend the features of using e-module applications to ensure their effectiveness in the development of superior e-modules in the future. The objectives of the present study were showing that mobile learning by e-module using different applications, i.e. Kodular and Flipbook, are valid, practical, effective and finding differences between the characteristics of e-module development to get a comprehensive idea for future development for researchers who want to develop e-module using both applications. The present study is a research and development study. The selected development model was ADDIE i.e. Analyze, Design, Development, Implementation and Evaluation. The Subject e-module learning media users were junior high school students. The validity of e-module media by Kodular is 92.55%, which is very good. The validity of e-module media by Flipbook is 90.35%, which is very good. The test result on the respondents who used e-module by Kodular is 83.45% feasible to use and the result of e-module by Flipbook is 86.39% also feasible to use. The Kodular e-module had an average student learning outcome score of 78.28, while the Flipbook e-module had an average score of 70.67. The two e-modules from the application were examined, and five differences were identified in the characteristics of e-modules from Kodular and Flipbook, in order to support the continuous development of e-modules.","PeriodicalId":497706,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Didaktik Matematika","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Didaktik Matematika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24815/jdm.v10i1.29730","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To develop media such as e-modules, a comprehensive understanding of the applications used to create them is necessary. It is essential to comprehend the features of using e-module applications to ensure their effectiveness in the development of superior e-modules in the future. The objectives of the present study were showing that mobile learning by e-module using different applications, i.e. Kodular and Flipbook, are valid, practical, effective and finding differences between the characteristics of e-module development to get a comprehensive idea for future development for researchers who want to develop e-module using both applications. The present study is a research and development study. The selected development model was ADDIE i.e. Analyze, Design, Development, Implementation and Evaluation. The Subject e-module learning media users were junior high school students. The validity of e-module media by Kodular is 92.55%, which is very good. The validity of e-module media by Flipbook is 90.35%, which is very good. The test result on the respondents who used e-module by Kodular is 83.45% feasible to use and the result of e-module by Flipbook is 86.39% also feasible to use. The Kodular e-module had an average student learning outcome score of 78.28, while the Flipbook e-module had an average score of 70.67. The two e-modules from the application were examined, and five differences were identified in the characteristics of e-modules from Kodular and Flipbook, in order to support the continuous development of e-modules.
用Kodular和Flipbook开发初中生数学电子模块:差异
要开发诸如e-module之类的媒体,必须全面了解用于创建它们的应用程序。了解使用电子模块应用程序的特点,以确保它们在未来开发高级电子模块时的有效性是至关重要的。本研究的目的是表明使用不同应用程序(即Kodular和Flipbook)的电子模块移动学习是有效的、实用的、有效的,并找到电子模块开发特征之间的差异,为希望使用这两种应用程序开发电子模块的研究人员提供一个全面的未来发展思路。本研究属于研究性和发展性研究。选择的开发模式是ADDIE,即分析、设计、开发、实施和评估。主题e-module学习媒体用户为初中生。Kodular的e-module媒体的有效性为92.55%,非常好。Flipbook的e-module媒体的有效性为90.35%,非常好。使用Kodular e-module的受访者测试结果为83.45%,使用Flipbook e-module的受访者测试结果为86.39%。Kodular电子模块的学生学习成果平均分为78.28分,Flipbook电子模块的学生学习成果平均分为70.67分。对应用程序中的两个电子模块进行了检查,并在Kodular和Flipbook的电子模块特征中确定了五个差异,以支持电子模块的持续开发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信