Comparison of organic carbon properties in extracted soil solutions obtained underneath Cryptomeria japonica and Quercus acutissima and its implication on stream dissolved organic carbon

IF 1.8 Q2 FORESTRY
Eun-Ju Lee, Yuseung Shin, Kyuyeon Lee, Seung-Cheol Lee, Ji-Yeon Cha, Neung-Hwan Oh
{"title":"Comparison of organic carbon properties in extracted soil solutions obtained underneath <i>Cryptomeria japonica</i> and <i>Quercus acutissima</i> and its implication on stream dissolved organic carbon","authors":"Eun-Ju Lee, Yuseung Shin, Kyuyeon Lee, Seung-Cheol Lee, Ji-Yeon Cha, Neung-Hwan Oh","doi":"10.1080/21580103.2023.2265966","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dissolved organic carbon (DOC) in soils is released into streams, working as a main component of the carbon cycle. DOC in terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems participates in many biogeochemical reactions and processes such as heterotrophic respiration, sorption of metals, and transport of pollutants. In order to understand the connectivity of organic carbon among soil, soil water, and forest streams, we investigated the concentrations and dual carbon isotope ratios (δ13C and Δ14C) of soil organic carbon (SOC) and water-extractable organic carbon (WEOC) obtained from soils beneath two tree species stands, and compared these with stream Δ14C-DOC of the forest watershed. Soil samples were collected at different depths (0–10, 10–30, and 30–50 cm) beneath Japanese cedar (Cryptomeria japonica) and sawtooth oak (Quercus acutissima). Although the SOC concentration was not significantly different between the two tree species, the WEOC concentration ([WEOC]) of soil at 0–10 cm depth under Cryptomeria japonica was higher than that of Quercus acutissima, in general. The δ13C-SOC and δ13C-WEOC increased, while the Δ14C-SOC and Δ14C-WEOC decreased with increasing soil depth. The Δ14C-WEOC was higher than the Δ14C-SOC, indicating that WEOC could be primarily derived from the young, hydrophilic, and exchangeable fraction of SOC, rather than from SOC strongly bonded to mineral soils. However, the stream Δ14C-DOC was lower than Δ14C-WEOC in general, except during summer storms. The 14C-depleted DOC released from deep soils or groundwater might lower Δ14C-DOC of a stream, suggesting that relatively old DOC could be released into streams during baseflow. This is contrary to the results of previous studies that have reported positive stream Δ14C-DOC from temperate forests. The discrepancy warrants future research on forest stream Δ14C-DOC across entire seasons, particularly under Asian monsoon climates.","PeriodicalId":51802,"journal":{"name":"Forest Science and Technology","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21580103.2023.2265966","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dissolved organic carbon (DOC) in soils is released into streams, working as a main component of the carbon cycle. DOC in terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems participates in many biogeochemical reactions and processes such as heterotrophic respiration, sorption of metals, and transport of pollutants. In order to understand the connectivity of organic carbon among soil, soil water, and forest streams, we investigated the concentrations and dual carbon isotope ratios (δ13C and Δ14C) of soil organic carbon (SOC) and water-extractable organic carbon (WEOC) obtained from soils beneath two tree species stands, and compared these with stream Δ14C-DOC of the forest watershed. Soil samples were collected at different depths (0–10, 10–30, and 30–50 cm) beneath Japanese cedar (Cryptomeria japonica) and sawtooth oak (Quercus acutissima). Although the SOC concentration was not significantly different between the two tree species, the WEOC concentration ([WEOC]) of soil at 0–10 cm depth under Cryptomeria japonica was higher than that of Quercus acutissima, in general. The δ13C-SOC and δ13C-WEOC increased, while the Δ14C-SOC and Δ14C-WEOC decreased with increasing soil depth. The Δ14C-WEOC was higher than the Δ14C-SOC, indicating that WEOC could be primarily derived from the young, hydrophilic, and exchangeable fraction of SOC, rather than from SOC strongly bonded to mineral soils. However, the stream Δ14C-DOC was lower than Δ14C-WEOC in general, except during summer storms. The 14C-depleted DOC released from deep soils or groundwater might lower Δ14C-DOC of a stream, suggesting that relatively old DOC could be released into streams during baseflow. This is contrary to the results of previous studies that have reported positive stream Δ14C-DOC from temperate forests. The discrepancy warrants future research on forest stream Δ14C-DOC across entire seasons, particularly under Asian monsoon climates.
柳杉和麻栎土壤提取液中有机碳的比较及其对河流溶解有机碳的影响
土壤中的溶解有机碳(DOC)被释放到河流中,是碳循环的主要组成部分。陆地和水生生态系统中的DOC参与了异养呼吸、金属吸附、污染物运输等多种生物地球化学反应和过程。为了了解土壤、土壤水和森林溪流之间有机碳的连通性,研究了两种树种下土壤有机碳(SOC)和水可提取有机碳(WEOC)的浓度和双碳同位素比值(δ13C和Δ14C),并与森林流域溪流Δ14C-DOC进行了比较。在杉木(Cryptomeria japonica)和锯齿栎(Quercus acutissima)下不同深度(0-10、10-30和30-50 cm)采集土壤样品。虽然两树种间土壤有机碳(SOC)浓度差异不显著,但总体而言,柳杉(cryptomia japonica) 0 ~ 10 cm深度土壤的WEOC浓度([WEOC])高于麻栎(Quercus acutissima)。随着土层深度的增加,δ13C-SOC和δ13C-WEOC增大,Δ14C-SOC和Δ14C-WEOC减小。Δ14C-WEOC大于Δ14C-SOC,说明土壤有机碳主要来源于有机碳的亲水交换组分,而非与矿质土壤紧密结合的有机碳。然而,除了夏季风暴期间,河流Δ14C-DOC总体上低于Δ14C-WEOC。从深层土壤或地下水中释放出的缺乏14c的DOC可能会降低河流的Δ14C-DOC,这表明在基流过程中,相对较老的DOC可能会被释放到河流中。这与先前报告的温带森林正流Δ14C-DOC的研究结果相反。这种差异保证了未来对森林溪流Δ14C-DOC整个季节的研究,特别是在亚洲季风气候下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
21 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信