{"title":"Building legitimacy: why the populist radical right engages in grassroots activism at the local level","authors":"Adrian Favero, Mattia Zulianello","doi":"10.1080/14782804.2023.2269383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTWhile the literature has widely explored the organisational strategies of populist radical right parties (PRRPs) on the fringes, little is known about the grassroots activism of mainstream PRRPs. We focus on the Italian League and the Swiss People’s Party (SVP), two mainstream PRRPs that have a long pedigree of government experience, to investigate if, how and why they invest in extensive activities at the local level to reach the public, despite their pivotal position in the national political scene. Methodologically, we rely on 120 interviews with members and representatives of these two PRRPs to identify the key grassroots activities they carry out at the local level and their perceived goals. The analysis reveals that despite their mainstream status, both the League and SVP still perceive to suffer from stigmatisation and demonisation, as they are not fully accepted as legitimate actors by the public. For this reason, they engage in grassroots activities and activism at the local level, the one closest to the everyday life and concerns of ordinary citizens. Grassroots activism aims to improve the legitimacy of PRRPs, by delivering the idea that their members and activists are normal people committed to help the local communities and not extremists.KEYWORDS: Populist radical rightgrassroots activismparty organisationstigmatisationlocal politics Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Supplementary materialSupplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2023.2269383Notes1. In the following pages, interviews are cited using abbreviations: the letter R stands for ‘representative’, while the letter M refers to ‘members’.Additional informationFundingThis research is supported by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC), (Grant Ref: ES/R011540/1), The survival of the mass party: Evaluating activism and participation among populist radical right parties (PRRPs) in Europe.","PeriodicalId":46035,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary European Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary European Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2023.2269383","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ABSTRACTWhile the literature has widely explored the organisational strategies of populist radical right parties (PRRPs) on the fringes, little is known about the grassroots activism of mainstream PRRPs. We focus on the Italian League and the Swiss People’s Party (SVP), two mainstream PRRPs that have a long pedigree of government experience, to investigate if, how and why they invest in extensive activities at the local level to reach the public, despite their pivotal position in the national political scene. Methodologically, we rely on 120 interviews with members and representatives of these two PRRPs to identify the key grassroots activities they carry out at the local level and their perceived goals. The analysis reveals that despite their mainstream status, both the League and SVP still perceive to suffer from stigmatisation and demonisation, as they are not fully accepted as legitimate actors by the public. For this reason, they engage in grassroots activities and activism at the local level, the one closest to the everyday life and concerns of ordinary citizens. Grassroots activism aims to improve the legitimacy of PRRPs, by delivering the idea that their members and activists are normal people committed to help the local communities and not extremists.KEYWORDS: Populist radical rightgrassroots activismparty organisationstigmatisationlocal politics Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Supplementary materialSupplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2023.2269383Notes1. In the following pages, interviews are cited using abbreviations: the letter R stands for ‘representative’, while the letter M refers to ‘members’.Additional informationFundingThis research is supported by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC), (Grant Ref: ES/R011540/1), The survival of the mass party: Evaluating activism and participation among populist radical right parties (PRRPs) in Europe.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Contemporary European Studies (previously Journal of European Area Studies) seeks to provide a forum for interdisciplinary debate about the theory and practice of area studies as well as for empirical studies of European societies, politics and cultures. The central area focus of the journal is European in its broadest geographical definition. However, the examination of European "areas" and themes are enhanced as a matter of editorial policy by non-European perspectives. The Journal intends to attract the interest of both cross-national and single-country specialists in European studies and to counteract the worst features of Eurocentrism with coverage of non-European views on European themes.