Economic analysis of lithium-ion battery recycling

IF 1.8 Q4 ENERGY & FUELS
AIMS Energy Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.3934/energy.2023045
Eduardo Enrique Martinez Jorges, António M.N. Quintino, Diogo M.F. Santos
{"title":"Economic analysis of lithium-ion battery recycling","authors":"Eduardo Enrique Martinez Jorges, António M.N. Quintino, Diogo M.F. Santos","doi":"10.3934/energy.2023045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<abstract> <p>Battery needs are increasing due to the exponential growth in demand for electric vehicles and renewable energy generation. These factors lead to the growing waste management of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs). Thus, recycling or finding a second life for LIBs is a growing industry due to its environmental and economic benefits. This work compares the benefits, economic advantages and disadvantages of battery recycling, including second-life battery applications. Different reports and case studies are analyzed to define the materials that may be recovered and the efficiency of the recycling process. To understand the economics of using recycled, second use, or new LIBs, this work evaluates three distinct projects, namely residential, commercial, and solar farm storage. The investigation aims to calculate and compare the net present value (NPV) for the residential storage project and the equivalent annual cost (EAC) for each project to determine the most viable industrial process within those parameters. The data analysis demonstrated that the second-life battery project has the lowest EAC, making it the most viable industrial process. However, although the second-life battery project presents the highest NPV for the project's first 10 years, the recycled battery project shows the highest NPV for the remainder of a typical 20-year project.</p> </abstract>","PeriodicalId":45696,"journal":{"name":"AIMS Energy","volume":"138 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AIMS Energy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3934/energy.2023045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Battery needs are increasing due to the exponential growth in demand for electric vehicles and renewable energy generation. These factors lead to the growing waste management of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs). Thus, recycling or finding a second life for LIBs is a growing industry due to its environmental and economic benefits. This work compares the benefits, economic advantages and disadvantages of battery recycling, including second-life battery applications. Different reports and case studies are analyzed to define the materials that may be recovered and the efficiency of the recycling process. To understand the economics of using recycled, second use, or new LIBs, this work evaluates three distinct projects, namely residential, commercial, and solar farm storage. The investigation aims to calculate and compare the net present value (NPV) for the residential storage project and the equivalent annual cost (EAC) for each project to determine the most viable industrial process within those parameters. The data analysis demonstrated that the second-life battery project has the lowest EAC, making it the most viable industrial process. However, although the second-life battery project presents the highest NPV for the project's first 10 years, the recycled battery project shows the highest NPV for the remainder of a typical 20-year project.

锂离子电池回收的经济分析
& lt; abstract>由于对电动汽车和可再生能源发电的需求呈指数级增长,电池需求正在增加。这些因素导致锂离子电池(LIBs)的废物管理日益增加。因此,由于其环境和经济效益,回收或为lib寻找第二次生命是一个不断发展的行业。这项工作比较了电池回收的好处、经济优势和缺点,包括二次电池的应用。分析了不同的报告和案例研究,以确定可以回收的材料和回收过程的效率。为了了解使用回收、二次利用或新lib的经济性,本工作评估了三个不同的项目,即住宅、商业和太阳能农场存储。调查旨在计算和比较住宅储能项目的净现值(NPV)和每个项目的等效年成本(EAC),以确定在这些参数范围内最可行的工业过程。数据分析表明,二次寿命电池项目EAC最低,是最具可行性的工业工艺。然而,尽管二次电池项目在项目的前10年的NPV最高,但回收电池项目在典型的20年项目的剩余时间内的NPV最高。& lt; / abstract>
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AIMS Energy
AIMS Energy ENERGY & FUELS-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
11.10%
发文量
34
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: AIMS Energy is an international Open Access journal devoted to publishing peer-reviewed, high quality, original papers in the field of Energy technology and science. We publish the following article types: original research articles, reviews, editorials, letters, and conference reports. AIMS Energy welcomes, but not limited to, the papers from the following topics: · Alternative energy · Bioenergy · Biofuel · Energy conversion · Energy conservation · Energy transformation · Future energy development · Green energy · Power harvesting · Renewable energy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信