Prehospital administration of antibiotics in addition to usual care versus usual care alone for patients with suspected sepsis – a systematic review

Q2 Health Professions
Maddison Jayne Poynter, Ashley Farrugia, Elisabeth Kelly, Paul M Simpson
{"title":"Prehospital administration of antibiotics in addition to usual care versus usual care alone for patients with suspected sepsis – a systematic review","authors":"Maddison Jayne Poynter, Ashley Farrugia, Elisabeth Kelly, Paul M Simpson","doi":"10.1177/27536386231207055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sepsis is an increasingly common presentation to which ambulance resources are dispatched. Whilst early administration of antibiotics (AB) has been associated with improved outcomes, the impact of prehospital administration in an ambulance service context appears uncertain. This systematic review aimed to compare the effect of prehospital administration of antibiotics together with usual care (oxygen and intravenous fluids), to usual care alone, on mortality for patients with sepsis. A systematic review was conducted adherent to JBI methodology. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they were published after 2000; conducted in the prehospital setting; compared AB plus usual care to usual care alone in the prehospital phase; and reported an outcome of mortality at any time point. Systematic searches of Medline, CINAHL, EMBASE and Google Scholar were conducted, with included articles subjected to quality assessment using JBI appraisal tools. Each stage was completed by two authors, with a third engaged to resolve conflicts. A narrative synthesis was conducted and reported, and certainty of evidence was assessed. Of 587 studies identified from the searches, five satisfied the inclusion criteria and were included in the data synthesis. Two were randomized controlled trials, and three used observational comparative designs assessed as being at low-to-moderate risk of bias. Regarding the primary outcome of mortality, there was no evidence from high-quality studies with a low risk of bias that prehospital administration of ABs decreased mortality when measured at 28, 30 or 90 days. Regarding secondary outcomes, there was no evidence from high-quality studies with a low risk of bias that prehospital ABs reduce the length of stay in the hospital generally or the intensive care unit. The certainty of findings was low for mortality at 90 days, and very low for measurement at 28 and 30 days. There was insufficient evidence from high-quality studies with a low risk of bias indicating prehospital administration of ABs in addition to usual care, compared to usual care alone, reduces mortality at 28, 30 or 90 days, or length of stay in hospital or ICU, for adult patients with sepsis. There is insufficient evidence to enable the recommendation of routine administration of antibiotics to patients with sepsis presenting to ambulance service clinicians in the prehospital setting. Investigation of administration to more severe sepsis presentations in settings where prolonged prehospital intervals are inherent is warranted.","PeriodicalId":55865,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Paramedicine","volume":"99 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal of Paramedicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/27536386231207055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sepsis is an increasingly common presentation to which ambulance resources are dispatched. Whilst early administration of antibiotics (AB) has been associated with improved outcomes, the impact of prehospital administration in an ambulance service context appears uncertain. This systematic review aimed to compare the effect of prehospital administration of antibiotics together with usual care (oxygen and intravenous fluids), to usual care alone, on mortality for patients with sepsis. A systematic review was conducted adherent to JBI methodology. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they were published after 2000; conducted in the prehospital setting; compared AB plus usual care to usual care alone in the prehospital phase; and reported an outcome of mortality at any time point. Systematic searches of Medline, CINAHL, EMBASE and Google Scholar were conducted, with included articles subjected to quality assessment using JBI appraisal tools. Each stage was completed by two authors, with a third engaged to resolve conflicts. A narrative synthesis was conducted and reported, and certainty of evidence was assessed. Of 587 studies identified from the searches, five satisfied the inclusion criteria and were included in the data synthesis. Two were randomized controlled trials, and three used observational comparative designs assessed as being at low-to-moderate risk of bias. Regarding the primary outcome of mortality, there was no evidence from high-quality studies with a low risk of bias that prehospital administration of ABs decreased mortality when measured at 28, 30 or 90 days. Regarding secondary outcomes, there was no evidence from high-quality studies with a low risk of bias that prehospital ABs reduce the length of stay in the hospital generally or the intensive care unit. The certainty of findings was low for mortality at 90 days, and very low for measurement at 28 and 30 days. There was insufficient evidence from high-quality studies with a low risk of bias indicating prehospital administration of ABs in addition to usual care, compared to usual care alone, reduces mortality at 28, 30 or 90 days, or length of stay in hospital or ICU, for adult patients with sepsis. There is insufficient evidence to enable the recommendation of routine administration of antibiotics to patients with sepsis presenting to ambulance service clinicians in the prehospital setting. Investigation of administration to more severe sepsis presentations in settings where prolonged prehospital intervals are inherent is warranted.
院前对疑似脓毒症患者在常规护理之外给予抗生素与单独常规护理的比较——一项系统综述
脓毒症是一种越来越常见的表现,救护车资源被派遣。虽然早期给药抗生素(AB)与改善的结果有关,院前给药在救护车服务背景下的影响似乎不确定。本系统综述旨在比较院前抗生素联合常规护理(氧气和静脉输液)与单独常规护理对脓毒症患者死亡率的影响。遵循JBI方法进行系统评价。2000年以后发表的研究符合入选条件;在院前环境中进行;院前阶段AB加常规护理与单独常规护理的比较;并报告了任意时间点的死亡率结果。系统检索Medline、CINAHL、EMBASE和Google Scholar,使用JBI评价工具对纳入的文章进行质量评价。每个阶段由两位作者完成,第三位作者负责解决冲突。进行并报告了叙述综合,并评估了证据的确定性。从检索中确定的587项研究中,有5项符合纳入标准,被纳入数据综合。两项是随机对照试验,三项采用观察性比较设计,评估为低至中等偏倚风险。关于死亡率的主要结局,在低偏倚风险的高质量研究中,没有证据表明院前给药ABs降低了28、30或90天的死亡率。关于次要结局,没有来自低偏倚风险的高质量研究的证据表明院前抗体一般会减少住院时间或重症监护病房的住院时间。对于90天的死亡率,结果的确定性很低,对于28天和30天的测量,结果的确定性很低。来自低偏倚风险的高质量研究的证据不足,表明院前在常规护理之外给予抗体,与单独的常规护理相比,可降低成年脓毒症患者28、30或90天的死亡率,或住院或ICU的住院时间。目前还没有足够的证据能够推荐在院前向救护车服务临床医生提出的败血症患者常规给予抗生素。在院前间隔延长的情况下,对更严重的脓毒症表现的调查是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australasian Journal of Paramedicine
Australasian Journal of Paramedicine Health Professions-Emergency Medical Services
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信