Cisnormativity, Erasure, and Discrimination: How Do Trans, Non-Binary, and Intersex Persons Experience Obstetric Care Compared to Endosex Cisgender Individuals in Germany?

Ska Salden, Tatiana Graf, Ulrike Roth
{"title":"Cisnormativity, Erasure, and Discrimination: How Do Trans, Non-Binary, and Intersex Persons Experience Obstetric Care Compared to Endosex Cisgender Individuals in Germany?","authors":"Ska Salden, Tatiana Graf, Ulrike Roth","doi":"10.1080/23293691.2023.2179904","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractTrans and intersex individuals are often not considered in obstetric care—neither in practice nor in research. This quantitative study used an online survey to compare the experiences of pregnant trans men, non-binary individuals, and intersex people with those of endosex cisgender individuals who received care in obstetrics. Trans men and non-binary individuals reported discrimination during pregnancy and childbirth on the interactional, institutional, and structural level: for example, they reported more unsatisfactory encounters with health care personnel and more barriers in the structure of health care services and facilities. Trans and intersex individuals had less access to information relevant to them concerning pregnancy and birth compared to cisgender endosex individuals. Although it happened less frequently, cisgender endosex individuals also reported negative experiences, such as discrimination or violence during birth in a hospital. Our findings indicate a need for change concerning several aspects of the obstetric care spectrum—especially, but not exclusively, for trans, non-binary, and intersex people. Some suggestions for improvement include the following: On the hospital level, measures should be implemented to reduce structural discrimination and to ascertain one-on-one care during active labor. Inclusive information material should be developed and disseminated and health care institutions should raise awareness among their staff regarding care for their LGBTIQ patients. More studies on obstetric issues concerning queer, trans, and especially intersex people should be conducted and diversity and inclusion should be implemented as core topics in the training curricula for midwives, physicians, and nurses.Keywords: LGBTIQqueerpregnancyhealthreproductive rights AcknowledgmentsThanks are due to Meike Watzlawik, Elisabeth Ponocny-Seeliger, and Joey Powers for their friendly intellectual support.Disclosure StatementThe authors report there are no competing interests to declare.Data Availability StatementThe data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, Ska Salden, upon reasonable request.Notes1 In Germany, all costs for a hospital birth are usually covered by national health insurance, while the birthing person has to carry some of the costs for a birth in a birth center or at home with a midwife.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the Gunda Werner Institute/Heinrich Böll Stiftung.","PeriodicalId":75331,"journal":{"name":"Women's reproductive health (Philadelphia, Pa.)","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women's reproductive health (Philadelphia, Pa.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23293691.2023.2179904","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AbstractTrans and intersex individuals are often not considered in obstetric care—neither in practice nor in research. This quantitative study used an online survey to compare the experiences of pregnant trans men, non-binary individuals, and intersex people with those of endosex cisgender individuals who received care in obstetrics. Trans men and non-binary individuals reported discrimination during pregnancy and childbirth on the interactional, institutional, and structural level: for example, they reported more unsatisfactory encounters with health care personnel and more barriers in the structure of health care services and facilities. Trans and intersex individuals had less access to information relevant to them concerning pregnancy and birth compared to cisgender endosex individuals. Although it happened less frequently, cisgender endosex individuals also reported negative experiences, such as discrimination or violence during birth in a hospital. Our findings indicate a need for change concerning several aspects of the obstetric care spectrum—especially, but not exclusively, for trans, non-binary, and intersex people. Some suggestions for improvement include the following: On the hospital level, measures should be implemented to reduce structural discrimination and to ascertain one-on-one care during active labor. Inclusive information material should be developed and disseminated and health care institutions should raise awareness among their staff regarding care for their LGBTIQ patients. More studies on obstetric issues concerning queer, trans, and especially intersex people should be conducted and diversity and inclusion should be implemented as core topics in the training curricula for midwives, physicians, and nurses.Keywords: LGBTIQqueerpregnancyhealthreproductive rights AcknowledgmentsThanks are due to Meike Watzlawik, Elisabeth Ponocny-Seeliger, and Joey Powers for their friendly intellectual support.Disclosure StatementThe authors report there are no competing interests to declare.Data Availability StatementThe data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, Ska Salden, upon reasonable request.Notes1 In Germany, all costs for a hospital birth are usually covered by national health insurance, while the birthing person has to carry some of the costs for a birth in a birth center or at home with a midwife.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the Gunda Werner Institute/Heinrich Böll Stiftung.
顺规范、抹除和歧视:在德国,变性人、非二元性人和双性人与内性的顺性人相比,如何经历产科护理?
摘要在产科护理中,无论是在实践中还是在研究中,变性人和双性人通常都不被考虑。本定量研究采用在线调查比较怀孕的变性人、非双性人、双性人与接受产科护理的内性顺性人的经历。跨性别男性和非二元性别个体报告了在怀孕和分娩期间在互动、制度和结构层面上的歧视:例如,他们报告了与卫生保健人员更多不满意的遭遇,以及卫生保健服务和设施结构中的更多障碍。跨性别和双性人与顺性别内性人相比,获得与他们有关的怀孕和生育信息的机会较少。虽然这种情况发生的频率较低,但顺性内向者也报告了负面经历,例如在医院分娩时受到歧视或暴力。我们的研究结果表明,需要改变产科护理谱的几个方面,特别是,但不限于,跨性别,非二元性和双性人。改进建议如下:在医院层面,应采取措施减少结构性歧视,并确定主动分娩时的一对一护理。应编写和传播包容性的信息材料,卫生保健机构应提高其工作人员对LGBTIQ患者护理的认识。应该开展更多关于酷儿、变性人,特别是双性人的产科问题的研究,并将多样性和包容性作为助产士、医生和护士培训课程的核心主题。感谢Meike Watzlawik、Elisabeth Ponocny-Seeliger和Joey Powers友好的智力支持。声明作者报告无竞争利益需要申报。数据可用性声明支持本研究结果的数据可根据合理要求从通讯作者Ska Salden处获得。注1在德国,医院分娩的所有费用通常由国家健康保险支付,而在分娩中心或在家中由助产士接生的产妇必须承担部分费用。本研究得到了Gunda Werner研究所/Heinrich Böll基金会的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信