Establishment of Risk Prediction Model for Soil and Groundwater Pollution of Gas Station with Machine Learning Techniques

I-Cheng Chang, Shen-De Chen, Tai-Yi Yu
{"title":"Establishment of Risk Prediction Model for Soil and Groundwater Pollution of Gas Station with Machine Learning Techniques","authors":"I-Cheng Chang, Shen-De Chen, Tai-Yi Yu","doi":"10.18178/ijml.2023.13.4.1144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the rapid development of network technology and the digital economy, the wave of the era of artificial intelligence has swept the world. Facing the era of big data and artificial intelligence, data-oriented technologies are undoubtedly served as the practical research trend. Therefore, the precise analysis provided by big data and artificial intelligence can provide effective and accurate knowledge and decision-making references for all sectors. In order to effectively and appropriately evaluate the potential risk to soil and groundwater for gas station industry, this study focuses on the potential risk factors affecting soil and groundwater pollution. In the past, our team has evaluated the risk factors affecting the remediation cost of soil and groundwater pollution for possible potential pollution sources such as gas stations, this study proceeds with the existing industrial database for in-depth discussion, uses machine learning technology to evaluate the key factors of pollution risk for soil and groundwater, and compares the differences, applicability and relative importance of the three machine learning techniques (such as neural networks, random forests and support vector machine). The performance indicators reveal that the random forest algorithm is better than support vector machine and artificial neural network. The relative importance of parameters of different machine learning models is not consistent, and the first five dominant parameters are location, number of gas monitoring wells, age of gas station, numbers of gasoline oil nozzle, and number of fuel dispenser for random forest model.","PeriodicalId":91709,"journal":{"name":"International journal of machine learning and computing","volume":"87 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of machine learning and computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18178/ijml.2023.13.4.1144","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the rapid development of network technology and the digital economy, the wave of the era of artificial intelligence has swept the world. Facing the era of big data and artificial intelligence, data-oriented technologies are undoubtedly served as the practical research trend. Therefore, the precise analysis provided by big data and artificial intelligence can provide effective and accurate knowledge and decision-making references for all sectors. In order to effectively and appropriately evaluate the potential risk to soil and groundwater for gas station industry, this study focuses on the potential risk factors affecting soil and groundwater pollution. In the past, our team has evaluated the risk factors affecting the remediation cost of soil and groundwater pollution for possible potential pollution sources such as gas stations, this study proceeds with the existing industrial database for in-depth discussion, uses machine learning technology to evaluate the key factors of pollution risk for soil and groundwater, and compares the differences, applicability and relative importance of the three machine learning techniques (such as neural networks, random forests and support vector machine). The performance indicators reveal that the random forest algorithm is better than support vector machine and artificial neural network. The relative importance of parameters of different machine learning models is not consistent, and the first five dominant parameters are location, number of gas monitoring wells, age of gas station, numbers of gasoline oil nozzle, and number of fuel dispenser for random forest model.
基于机器学习技术的加油站土壤和地下水污染风险预测模型的建立
随着网络技术和数字经济的飞速发展,人工智能时代的浪潮席卷全球。面对大数据和人工智能时代,面向数据的技术无疑是实用化的研究趋势。因此,大数据和人工智能提供的精准分析可以为各行业提供有效准确的知识和决策参考。为了有效、合理地评价加油站行业对土壤和地下水的潜在风险,本研究重点研究了影响加油站行业土壤和地下水污染的潜在风险因素。过去,我们团队对加油站等可能的潜在污染源评估了影响土壤和地下水污染修复成本的风险因素,本研究结合现有的工业数据库进行深入讨论,利用机器学习技术评估土壤和地下水污染风险的关键因素,并比较差异。三种机器学习技术(如神经网络、随机森林和支持向量机)的适用性和相对重要性。性能指标表明,随机森林算法优于支持向量机和人工神经网络。不同机器学习模型参数的相对重要性并不一致,随机森林模型的前五个主导参数是位置、气体监测井数量、加油站年龄、汽油喷嘴数量和加油机数量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信