The Struggle for Tsaritsyn during the Civil War in Russia: On Publication of the Collective Monograph

IF 0.1 Q4 HISTORY
Evgenii P. Vorobiev
{"title":"The Struggle for Tsaritsyn during the Civil War in Russia: On Publication of the Collective Monograph","authors":"Evgenii P. Vorobiev","doi":"10.28995/2073-0101-2023-3-939-944","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The review of the monograph “The Civil War in Tsaritsyn: 1918–20” considers Volgograd historians-archivists’ views on the struggle between the Reds and the Whites in the South of Russia, resuming discussion on the role of J. V. Stalin in the organization of Tsaritsyn’s defense and of impact of the battles for the city on the overall development of military and political confrontation of the warring parties. The reviewer confirms the opinion of the authors that decreased significance of Tsaritsyn events of 1918–19 in the national historiography sprang from intention to diminish the merits of J. V. Stalin and his associates. Eventually, stubborn battles for the most important industrial and transport center and efforts to solve the food supply issues in the Soviet Republic turned into ordinary episodes of the history Civil War in Russia. The review emphasizes validity of the conclusions on the causes of successes and failures of the Red Army near Tsaritsyn: mood fluctuations of the Don Cossacks, contradictions between the Ataman of the Don Army P. N. Krasnov and the leaders of the Volunteer army, low discipline and manageability of military units defending the city. The materials of the monograph are consistent with the achievements of modern foreign historiography, which pays increasing attention to the episodes of the Civil War that made J. V. Stalin a politician and the leader of the Soviet state. The review substantiates the importance of the published book for analysis of food policy of the Bolshevik government, of significance of German aid for fighting efficiency of the Don Army, of socio-economic features of the region, which determined the balance of opposed forces. It underscores the relevance and information value of unique photographs and documents, found in the fonds of the central and local archives and published in the monograph. Visual sources provide an opportunity to consider the early stages of formation of historical memory of the events in the South of Russia in 1918–19. The reviewer expresses his opinion on the prospects of further research involving documents from the Russian State Military Archives (RGVA), which permit to identify the specifics of city life over years of martial law. The analysis of issues of wartime everyday life, of survival under during terror, military operations, and constant mobilization of resources can enhance the perception of the Civil War as a tragedy, contributing to national reconciliation in Russia.","PeriodicalId":41551,"journal":{"name":"Herald of an Archivist","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Herald of an Archivist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-0101-2023-3-939-944","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The review of the monograph “The Civil War in Tsaritsyn: 1918–20” considers Volgograd historians-archivists’ views on the struggle between the Reds and the Whites in the South of Russia, resuming discussion on the role of J. V. Stalin in the organization of Tsaritsyn’s defense and of impact of the battles for the city on the overall development of military and political confrontation of the warring parties. The reviewer confirms the opinion of the authors that decreased significance of Tsaritsyn events of 1918–19 in the national historiography sprang from intention to diminish the merits of J. V. Stalin and his associates. Eventually, stubborn battles for the most important industrial and transport center and efforts to solve the food supply issues in the Soviet Republic turned into ordinary episodes of the history Civil War in Russia. The review emphasizes validity of the conclusions on the causes of successes and failures of the Red Army near Tsaritsyn: mood fluctuations of the Don Cossacks, contradictions between the Ataman of the Don Army P. N. Krasnov and the leaders of the Volunteer army, low discipline and manageability of military units defending the city. The materials of the monograph are consistent with the achievements of modern foreign historiography, which pays increasing attention to the episodes of the Civil War that made J. V. Stalin a politician and the leader of the Soviet state. The review substantiates the importance of the published book for analysis of food policy of the Bolshevik government, of significance of German aid for fighting efficiency of the Don Army, of socio-economic features of the region, which determined the balance of opposed forces. It underscores the relevance and information value of unique photographs and documents, found in the fonds of the central and local archives and published in the monograph. Visual sources provide an opportunity to consider the early stages of formation of historical memory of the events in the South of Russia in 1918–19. The reviewer expresses his opinion on the prospects of further research involving documents from the Russian State Military Archives (RGVA), which permit to identify the specifics of city life over years of martial law. The analysis of issues of wartime everyday life, of survival under during terror, military operations, and constant mobilization of resources can enhance the perception of the Civil War as a tragedy, contributing to national reconciliation in Russia.
俄国内战时期为察里琴的斗争——兼论集体专著的出版
对专著《察里津内战:1918 - 1920》的评论考虑了伏尔加格勒历史学家和档案学家对俄罗斯南部红白斗争的看法,重新讨论了斯大林在组织察里津防御中的作用,以及该市的战斗对交战各方军事和政治对抗的整体发展的影响。审稿人证实了作者的观点,即1918 - 1919年察里琴事件在国家史学中的重要性降低,是为了贬低j·v·斯大林及其同伙的功绩。最终,为争夺最重要的工业和运输中心而进行的顽强战斗,以及为解决苏维埃共和国的粮食供应问题所做的努力,变成了俄罗斯内战历史上的普通插曲。审查强调了关于察里琴附近红军成败原因的结论的有效性:顿河哥萨克人的情绪波动、顿河军队的阿塔曼(P. N. Krasnov)与志愿军领导人之间的矛盾、守城部队的纪律低下和管理不善。专著的材料与现代外国史学的成就是一致的,它们越来越关注使斯大林成为政治家和苏维埃国家领导人的内战事件。这篇评论证实了这本出版的书对分析布尔什维克政府的粮食政策的重要性,对德国援助顿河军队作战效率的重要性,以及该地区的社会经济特征的重要性,这决定了对立力量的平衡。它强调了在中央和地方档案馆中发现并在专著中发表的独特照片和文件的相关性和信息价值。视觉资源提供了一个机会来考虑1918 - 1919年俄罗斯南部事件的历史记忆形成的早期阶段。审稿人对涉及俄罗斯国家军事档案(RGVA)文件的进一步研究前景表示意见,这些文件可以确定多年戒严令期间城市生活的具体情况。通过分析战争时期的日常生活、恐怖环境下的生存、军事行动、持续的资源动员等问题,可以提高对内战悲剧的认识,有助于俄罗斯的民族和解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信