Presenteísmo em Universidades Brasileiras: Propriedades Psicométricas de Instrumentos de Avaliação

Fernanda Ludmilla Rossi Rocha, Samuel Andrade de Oliveira, Thatyana Ribeiro de Araujo, Tobias Divino Santos, João Paulo Marôco, Juliana Alvares Duarte Bonini Campos
{"title":"Presenteísmo em Universidades Brasileiras: Propriedades Psicométricas de Instrumentos de Avaliação","authors":"Fernanda Ludmilla Rossi Rocha, Samuel Andrade de Oliveira, Thatyana Ribeiro de Araujo, Tobias Divino Santos, João Paulo Marôco, Juliana Alvares Duarte Bonini Campos","doi":"10.5935/rpot/2023.1.22807","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Presenteeism represents a phenomenon that occurs when people are physically present in the workplace but are functionally absent. The aims of this study were to estimate the presenteeism in university professors and administrative personnel of Brazilian public universities and to evaluate the psychometric properties of presenteeism instruments in the sample. The evaluation of presenteeism was carried out using the Work Limitation questionnaire (WLQ) and the Stanford Presenteeism scale (SPS-6). The psychometric properties of the instruments were analyzed using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). A total of 533 workers participated in the study (271 academic staff members and 262 university professors). The presenteeism index in the sample was .05. The CFA of the refined models showed adequate adjustments to the sample. However, the analysis of the explained variance of the presenteeism concept revealed strong contribution of the WLQ factors and the theoretical fragility of the SPS-6. The results provided evidence of the validity and reliability of the WLQ for the assessment of presenteeism in Brazilian university workers. Keywords: occupational health, presenteeism, psychometrics.","PeriodicalId":12373,"journal":{"name":"Fractal: Revista de Psicologia","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fractal: Revista de Psicologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5935/rpot/2023.1.22807","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Presenteeism represents a phenomenon that occurs when people are physically present in the workplace but are functionally absent. The aims of this study were to estimate the presenteeism in university professors and administrative personnel of Brazilian public universities and to evaluate the psychometric properties of presenteeism instruments in the sample. The evaluation of presenteeism was carried out using the Work Limitation questionnaire (WLQ) and the Stanford Presenteeism scale (SPS-6). The psychometric properties of the instruments were analyzed using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). A total of 533 workers participated in the study (271 academic staff members and 262 university professors). The presenteeism index in the sample was .05. The CFA of the refined models showed adequate adjustments to the sample. However, the analysis of the explained variance of the presenteeism concept revealed strong contribution of the WLQ factors and the theoretical fragility of the SPS-6. The results provided evidence of the validity and reliability of the WLQ for the assessment of presenteeism in Brazilian university workers. Keywords: occupational health, presenteeism, psychometrics.
巴西大学出勤率:评估工具的心理测量特性
“出勤主义”指的是一种现象,即人们实际出现在工作场所,但功能上却缺席。本研究的目的是估计巴西公立大学的大学教授和行政人员的出勤率,并评估样本中出勤率工具的心理测量特性。采用工作限制问卷(WLQ)和斯坦福出勤量表(SPS-6)对员工出勤进行评估。采用验证性因子分析(CFA)对仪器的心理测量特性进行分析。共有533名工作人员(271名学术人员和262名大学教授)参加了此次调查。样本的出勤指数为0.05。改进模型的CFA显示对样本有足够的调整。然而,对出勤概念的解释方差分析表明,WLQ因子和ps -6的理论脆弱性贡献较大。结果为WLQ评估巴西大学员工出勤的有效性和可靠性提供了证据。关键词:职业健康,出勤,心理测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信