FROM "RED" TO "NEW" CULTURE: TRADITION AND INNOVATIONS IN CHINESE MARXISM

Vitalii Turenko
{"title":"FROM \"RED\" TO \"NEW\" CULTURE: TRADITION AND INNOVATIONS IN CHINESE MARXISM","authors":"Vitalii Turenko","doi":"10.17721/ucs.2023.1(12).05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article examines in detail the understanding of culture and cultural practices in the context of such concepts of Chineseized Marxism as \"red culture\" and \"new culture\". It was revealed that culture, as well as aesthetic studies, were in the center of attention of Chinese Marxist circles. Accordingly, within the framework of the idea of \"new democracy\" the formation and further development of a \"new culture\" is developed, which involves the preservation of traditional priorities of Chinese civilization and the introduction of new aspects that relate both to the Marxist considerations of the leaders of the CCP and in accordance with modern global trends. Based on this, culture and the cultural revolution are inextricably linked with Marxist projects of criticizing capitalist modernity and building an alternative modernity. In this respect, the various practices and plans of Chinese Marxism are similar to those of Western Marxism. It is substantiated that along with the idea of \"new culture\" the concept of \"red culture\" functions, which differs from the former in its containing a synthesis of traditional Chinese culture and an understanding of the latter within the framework of Chineseized Marxism. This, according to thinkers and leaders of the CCP, helps in the fight against cultural imperialism disguised as globalization. Chinese aesthetic scholars followed the Western Marxist agenda; but at the same time deliberately criticized Western Marxism and its Maoist connections. It is noteworthy that the Chinese Marxist experience of the post-revolutionary society and the vision that arose from it drew another cognitive map, an alternative \"cultural topology\" for modern cultural studies. They offer us an epistemological alternative for understanding the genealogy of critical concepts and conceptual schemes through which the history of modern Chinese culture is interpreted. Chineseized Marxism examines these \"topological cultural spaces\" from a critical perspective, drawing attention to Chinese theories themselves and juxtaposing these theories with Western Marxist ones so that their assumptions can be subjected to critical scrutiny.","PeriodicalId":52653,"journal":{"name":"Ukrayins''ki kul''turologichni studiyi","volume":"97 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ukrayins''ki kul''turologichni studiyi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17721/ucs.2023.1(12).05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article examines in detail the understanding of culture and cultural practices in the context of such concepts of Chineseized Marxism as "red culture" and "new culture". It was revealed that culture, as well as aesthetic studies, were in the center of attention of Chinese Marxist circles. Accordingly, within the framework of the idea of "new democracy" the formation and further development of a "new culture" is developed, which involves the preservation of traditional priorities of Chinese civilization and the introduction of new aspects that relate both to the Marxist considerations of the leaders of the CCP and in accordance with modern global trends. Based on this, culture and the cultural revolution are inextricably linked with Marxist projects of criticizing capitalist modernity and building an alternative modernity. In this respect, the various practices and plans of Chinese Marxism are similar to those of Western Marxism. It is substantiated that along with the idea of "new culture" the concept of "red culture" functions, which differs from the former in its containing a synthesis of traditional Chinese culture and an understanding of the latter within the framework of Chineseized Marxism. This, according to thinkers and leaders of the CCP, helps in the fight against cultural imperialism disguised as globalization. Chinese aesthetic scholars followed the Western Marxist agenda; but at the same time deliberately criticized Western Marxism and its Maoist connections. It is noteworthy that the Chinese Marxist experience of the post-revolutionary society and the vision that arose from it drew another cognitive map, an alternative "cultural topology" for modern cultural studies. They offer us an epistemological alternative for understanding the genealogy of critical concepts and conceptual schemes through which the history of modern Chinese culture is interpreted. Chineseized Marxism examines these "topological cultural spaces" from a critical perspective, drawing attention to Chinese theories themselves and juxtaposing these theories with Western Marxist ones so that their assumptions can be subjected to critical scrutiny.
从“红色”文化到“新文化”:中国马克思主义的传统与创新
文章在马克思主义中国化的“红色文化”、“新文化”等概念背景下,详细考察了对文化的理解和文化实践。由此可见,文化研究与美学研究一样,是中国马克思主义学界关注的焦点。因此,在“新民主主义”思想的框架内,“新文化”的形成和进一步发展得到了发展,这包括保留中国文明的传统优先事项,并引入与中国共产党领导人的马克思主义思想有关的新方面,并符合现代全球趋势。在此基础上,文化和文革与马克思主义批判资本主义现代性和建立另一种现代性的计划有着密不可分的联系。在这方面,中国马克思主义的各种实践和方案与西方马克思主义是相似的。“红色文化”概念与“新文化”概念的不同之处在于,它既包含了对中国传统文化的综合,又在中国化的马克思主义框架内对中国传统文化的理解。根据中国共产党的思想家和领导人的说法,这有助于反对伪装成全球化的文化帝国主义。中国的美学学者遵循西方马克思主义的议程;但同时又故意批评西方马克思主义及其与毛派的联系。值得注意的是,中国马克思主义对革命后社会的经验和由此产生的视野,为现代文化研究绘制了另一幅认知地图,一种另类的“文化拓扑”。它们为我们提供了一种认识论的选择,以理解批判概念和概念方案的谱系,通过这些谱系来解释中国现代文化史。中国化的马克思主义从批判的视角审视这些“拓扑文化空间”,将人们的注意力吸引到中国理论本身,并将这些理论与西方马克思主义理论并置,从而使它们的假设能够受到批判的审视。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信