The necessity and the challenges for a unified model of clinical psychology: A commentary on Salvatore et al., 2022

Stanley Berman
{"title":"The necessity and the challenges for a unified model of clinical psychology: A commentary on Salvatore et al., 2022","authors":"Stanley Berman","doi":"10.3280/rpc1-2023oa15427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Salvatore et al. (2022) have contributed a most important commentary about how patients and the profession of Clinical Psychology are at considerable risk as the trend towards specialization has meant that even core constructs in our field are not universally endorsed. A science without fundamental agreement about foundational concepts is at great risk. They go on to make several salient suggestions to facilitate addressing this substantial problem. In this commentary, the author strongly agrees with their concern and applauds their suggested next steps towards a resolution. He argues that all scientific pursuits benefit from both theory and research that has a broad focus as well as a very specialized focus. Advances in cell biology, for example have created a new and vital field of gene editing. The difficulty is when health care provider psychologists can no longer have dialogues about shared and overlapping theory and practice. Examples of collaborative work in World War II technology research and in the development of Chaos Theory are cited, as well as the philosopher Stephen Pepper's argument about the role of root hypotheses. He proposes beginning a process of an international working group to assist in this effort to reunify our field. He also cautions and specifies the significant obstacles to this endeavor.","PeriodicalId":493122,"journal":{"name":"Rivista di Psicologia Clinica. Teorie e metodi dell'intervento","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rivista di Psicologia Clinica. Teorie e metodi dell'intervento","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3280/rpc1-2023oa15427","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Salvatore et al. (2022) have contributed a most important commentary about how patients and the profession of Clinical Psychology are at considerable risk as the trend towards specialization has meant that even core constructs in our field are not universally endorsed. A science without fundamental agreement about foundational concepts is at great risk. They go on to make several salient suggestions to facilitate addressing this substantial problem. In this commentary, the author strongly agrees with their concern and applauds their suggested next steps towards a resolution. He argues that all scientific pursuits benefit from both theory and research that has a broad focus as well as a very specialized focus. Advances in cell biology, for example have created a new and vital field of gene editing. The difficulty is when health care provider psychologists can no longer have dialogues about shared and overlapping theory and practice. Examples of collaborative work in World War II technology research and in the development of Chaos Theory are cited, as well as the philosopher Stephen Pepper's argument about the role of root hypotheses. He proposes beginning a process of an international working group to assist in this effort to reunify our field. He also cautions and specifies the significant obstacles to this endeavor.
临床心理学统一模型的必要性与挑战:对Salvatore et al., 2022的评论
Salvatore等人(2022)对患者和临床心理学专业如何面临相当大的风险做出了最重要的评论,因为专业化的趋势意味着即使是我们领域的核心结构也没有得到普遍认可。一门对基本概念没有基本共识的科学面临着巨大的风险。他们接着提出了几项重要建议,以促进解决这一实质性问题。在本评论中,作者强烈同意他们的关切,并赞扬他们为解决问题而建议的下一步措施。他认为,所有的科学追求都受益于既有广泛焦点又有非常专业焦点的理论和研究。例如,细胞生物学的进步创造了一个新的、至关重要的基因编辑领域。困难在于,当医疗保健提供者心理学家不能再就共享和重叠的理论和实践进行对话时。书中引用了二战技术研究和混沌理论发展中合作工作的例子,以及哲学家斯蒂芬·佩珀(Stephen Pepper)关于根假设作用的论点。他建议开始一个国际工作小组的进程,以协助这一努力,重新统一我们的领域。他还警告并指出了这一努力的重大障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信