Fooling with Things: Affordances and Appalachian Wheelchair Users

Zach Glendening
{"title":"Fooling with Things: Affordances and Appalachian Wheelchair Users","authors":"Zach Glendening","doi":"10.5406/23288612.29.2.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Disability theory suggests that built environments stigmatize wheelchair users. This article explores how wheelchair users resist stigma by altering possibilities for action, or affordances, in their environments by “fooling” or “tinkering” with things. I focus on wheelchair users in the US region of Appalachia for three reasons. First, academic studies of stigma against either Appalachians or wheelchair users tend to exclude people belonging to both groups. Second, Appalachia's particular forms of tinkering can complement existing work on affordance management by disabled people. Finally, the spatial and technological distance between many Appalachian wheelchair users gives them insight into how rural settings influence the collective manipulation of affordances. Results indicate that Appalachian wheelchair users tinker with affordances in a variety of settings and with many kinds of collaborators. Although not politically motivated in most cases, their actions nonetheless expose intersecting ableism and classism in American built environments.","PeriodicalId":93112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Appalachian studies","volume":"144 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Appalachian studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5406/23288612.29.2.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Disability theory suggests that built environments stigmatize wheelchair users. This article explores how wheelchair users resist stigma by altering possibilities for action, or affordances, in their environments by “fooling” or “tinkering” with things. I focus on wheelchair users in the US region of Appalachia for three reasons. First, academic studies of stigma against either Appalachians or wheelchair users tend to exclude people belonging to both groups. Second, Appalachia's particular forms of tinkering can complement existing work on affordance management by disabled people. Finally, the spatial and technological distance between many Appalachian wheelchair users gives them insight into how rural settings influence the collective manipulation of affordances. Results indicate that Appalachian wheelchair users tinker with affordances in a variety of settings and with many kinds of collaborators. Although not politically motivated in most cases, their actions nonetheless expose intersecting ableism and classism in American built environments.
玩弄事物:支持和阿巴拉契亚轮椅使用者
残疾理论认为,人造环境使轮椅使用者蒙受耻辱。这篇文章探讨了轮椅使用者是如何通过“愚弄”或“修修补补”来改变环境中行动的可能性或能力来抵制污名的。我关注美国阿巴拉契亚地区的轮椅使用者有三个原因。首先,学术研究对阿巴拉契亚人或轮椅使用者的耻辱倾向于排除属于这两个群体的人。其次,阿巴拉契亚的特殊修修补补形式可以补充现有的残疾人服务管理工作。最后,许多阿巴拉契亚轮椅使用者之间的空间和技术距离使他们深入了解农村环境如何影响对能力的集体操纵。研究结果表明,阿巴拉契亚地区的轮椅使用者在不同的环境下和不同的合作者中都能修补功能。虽然在大多数情况下没有政治动机,但他们的行为仍然暴露了美国建筑环境中交叉的残疾歧视和阶级歧视。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信