Predictors of Retirement Adjustment: A Comparative Study Among Occupations

Q4 Psychology

Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1590/0102.3772e39512.en

Mauro de Oliveira Magalhães

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This research investigated differences in retirement adjustment among workers in occupations classified by the RIASEC typology. The literature reports that this adjustment varies depending on individual access to resources such as health, finances, and personal attributes. The participants were 469 retirees, 65% women, aged between 47 and 88 years, who responded to the Retirement Resources Inventory, the Pearlin Mastery Scale and reported demographic data. The analysis revealed that retirees from social and investigative occupations have more resources and greater adjustment in retirement. Retirees from realistic occupations revealed an unfavorable perspective. Mastery proved to be the most important predictor of adjustment. The results indicate that retirement adjustment resources vary among workers from different occupational types.

查看原文本刊更多论文

退休调整的预测因素:职业间的比较研究

摘要本研究调查了按RIASEC类型分类的职业中工人退休调整的差异。文献报道，这种调整取决于个人获得的资源，如健康、财务和个人属性。参与者是469名退休人员，其中65%为女性，年龄在47至88岁之间，他们对退休资源清单、珀尔林掌握量表和报告的人口统计数据做出了回应。分析显示，从事社会调查类职业的退休人员拥有更多的资源，退休后的适应能力也更强。从事现实职业的退休人员表现出不利的观点。精通被证明是最重要的调整预测因子。结果表明，不同职业类型劳动者的退休调整资源存在差异。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa Psychology-Psychology (all)

CiteScore

0.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

48 weeks

期刊介绍： Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa is a journal published every three months by Instituto de Psicologia da Universidade de Brasília [Institute of Psychology - University of Brasília]. It aims at publishing original papers related to Psychology that fit into the following categories: research report, theoretical study, report of professional experience, critical literature review, short communication, letter to editor, technical note, review. News may also be published at the editor"s discretion. The authors assume responsibility for the articles signed; opinions and considerations included in the articles do not necessarily express the standing point of the Editorial Board.