In den Tiefen der Koalitionsverhandlungen 2005 bis 2021: Von der Arbeitsgruppe Gesundheit zum Koalitionsvertrag

Robin Rüsenberg, Lorenz Schleyer, Sven T. Siefken
{"title":"In den Tiefen der Koalitionsverhandlungen 2005 bis 2021: Von der Arbeitsgruppe Gesundheit zum Koalitionsvertrag","authors":"Robin Rüsenberg, Lorenz Schleyer, Sven T. Siefken","doi":"10.5771/0340-1758-2023-3-483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Coalition negotiations play a key role in government formation, but they have not been analyzed much in detail . In Germany, the past decades have seen an ongoing differentiation of their organization, leading to a complex multi-level negotiation structure with a policy- oriented division of labor . Studying the working group on health policy in the coalition negotiations following the German federal elections from 2005 to 2021 shows how far- reaching changes between the working group draft version and the final contract were . This sheds light on how the negotiation processes work and how their results are represented in the coalition treaties . Policy experts from the Bundestag and the state level, who are members of the working groups, have the opportunity to exercise great influence on the final results, especially if their working group has non-conflictual results . But negotiation leaders do exercise influence, particularly so on topics that are of relevance for party competition . The same goes for budget experts, select individuals and representatives of state interests . The method for analysis is instructive for other policy areas .","PeriodicalId":486211,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5771/0340-1758-2023-3-483","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Coalition negotiations play a key role in government formation, but they have not been analyzed much in detail . In Germany, the past decades have seen an ongoing differentiation of their organization, leading to a complex multi-level negotiation structure with a policy- oriented division of labor . Studying the working group on health policy in the coalition negotiations following the German federal elections from 2005 to 2021 shows how far- reaching changes between the working group draft version and the final contract were . This sheds light on how the negotiation processes work and how their results are represented in the coalition treaties . Policy experts from the Bundestag and the state level, who are members of the working groups, have the opportunity to exercise great influence on the final results, especially if their working group has non-conflictual results . But negotiation leaders do exercise influence, particularly so on topics that are of relevance for party competition . The same goes for budget experts, select individuals and representatives of state interests . The method for analysis is instructive for other policy areas .
将于2005年至2021年的大规模联合谈判:从健康工作组到联合协议
联合政府谈判在政府组建过程中发挥着关键作用,但尚未对其进行详细分析。在德国,过去几十年来,他们的组织不断分化,导致了一个复杂的多层次谈判结构,并以政策为导向的分工。对2005年至2021年德国联邦选举后联盟谈判中卫生政策工作组的研究表明,工作组草案和最终合同之间的变化影响深远。这阐明了谈判过程是如何运作的,以及谈判结果如何体现在联盟条约中。作为工作组成员的联邦议院和州一级的政策专家有机会对最终结果施加重大影响,特别是如果他们的工作组的结果不存在冲突。但谈判领导人确实会施加影响,尤其是在与政党竞争相关的议题上。预算专家、个别人士和国家利益代表也是如此。这种分析方法对其他政策领域具有指导意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书