Comparison of red blood corpuscle indices versus hemoglobin high-performance liquid chromatography as a screen for hemoglobinopathies in pregnant women

IF 0.1 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
JasvinderKaur Bhatia, Arnab Sengupta, Jasdeep Singh, Manisha Agarwal, Brajesh Singh, RavjotSingh Bhatia
{"title":"Comparison of red blood corpuscle indices versus hemoglobin high-performance liquid chromatography as a screen for hemoglobinopathies in pregnant women","authors":"JasvinderKaur Bhatia, Arnab Sengupta, Jasdeep Singh, Manisha Agarwal, Brajesh Singh, RavjotSingh Bhatia","doi":"10.4103/jmms.jmms_21_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Beta-thalassemia plagues India and thalassemia screening of pregnant women is crucial. Hemoglobin (Hb) high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) (Hb-HPLC) is the gold standard, however in distant places it is rarely an option. While data on the use of red blood cell (RBC) indices to screen pregnant women for thalassemia trait is still developing, a sensitive and specific RBC index is needed to test for beta thalassemia. In service situations, these affordable indices may be useful without HPLC. Objective: We aimed to determine the role of red blood corpuscle indices as a screening tool to differentiate between iron deficiency anemia (IDA) and hemoglobinopathies in pregnant women and to find out the most sensitive and the most specific index. Methods: With ethical approval, 500 patients were evaluated from February 2020 to August 2021. Complete blood Counts and peripheral blood smears were performed. Participants with microcytic hypochromic anemia were included. On these patients, the RBC indices (i) Shine and Lal, (ii) Mentzer’s index, (iii) red cell distribution width index, and (iv) Srivastava were calculated. Ferritin, iron, and total iron-binding capacity levels were also tested. Hb-HPLC was utilized as the gold standard. The Mann– Whitney U-test was used to compare continuous variables between groups. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy were calculated for various metrics. A P < 0.05 was statistically significant. Results: Hb-HPLC showed 29 (5.8%) heterozygous beta thalassemia and 471 (94.2%) IDA. Based on the updated cutoff value (4.727), Srivastava Index was the best screening tool. Conclusion: RBC indices can distinguish IDA from beta thalassemia in pregnant women and are valuable screening tools in service settings.","PeriodicalId":41773,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Marine Medical Society","volume":"138 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Marine Medical Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmms.jmms_21_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Beta-thalassemia plagues India and thalassemia screening of pregnant women is crucial. Hemoglobin (Hb) high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) (Hb-HPLC) is the gold standard, however in distant places it is rarely an option. While data on the use of red blood cell (RBC) indices to screen pregnant women for thalassemia trait is still developing, a sensitive and specific RBC index is needed to test for beta thalassemia. In service situations, these affordable indices may be useful without HPLC. Objective: We aimed to determine the role of red blood corpuscle indices as a screening tool to differentiate between iron deficiency anemia (IDA) and hemoglobinopathies in pregnant women and to find out the most sensitive and the most specific index. Methods: With ethical approval, 500 patients were evaluated from February 2020 to August 2021. Complete blood Counts and peripheral blood smears were performed. Participants with microcytic hypochromic anemia were included. On these patients, the RBC indices (i) Shine and Lal, (ii) Mentzer’s index, (iii) red cell distribution width index, and (iv) Srivastava were calculated. Ferritin, iron, and total iron-binding capacity levels were also tested. Hb-HPLC was utilized as the gold standard. The Mann– Whitney U-test was used to compare continuous variables between groups. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy were calculated for various metrics. A P < 0.05 was statistically significant. Results: Hb-HPLC showed 29 (5.8%) heterozygous beta thalassemia and 471 (94.2%) IDA. Based on the updated cutoff value (4.727), Srivastava Index was the best screening tool. Conclusion: RBC indices can distinguish IDA from beta thalassemia in pregnant women and are valuable screening tools in service settings.
红血球指数与血红蛋白高效液相色谱法筛查孕妇血红蛋白病的比较
乙型地中海贫血是印度的一大疾病,对孕妇进行地中海贫血筛查至关重要。血红蛋白(Hb)高效液相色谱(Hb-HPLC)是金标准,但在遥远的地方,它很少是一种选择。虽然使用红细胞(RBC)指数筛查孕妇地中海贫血特征的数据仍在发展中,但需要一种敏感和特异性的RBC指数来检测β地中海贫血。在服务情况下,这些负担得起的指数可能没有HPLC有用。目的:探讨红细胞指标作为鉴别孕妇缺铁性贫血(IDA)和血红蛋白病的筛查工具的作用,寻找最敏感、最特异的指标。方法:经伦理批准,于2020年2月至2021年8月对500例患者进行评估。全血细胞计数和外周血涂片。患有小细胞性低色素贫血的参与者也包括在内。计算这些患者的红细胞指数(i) Shine和Lal, (ii) Mentzer指数,(iii)红细胞分布宽度指数,(iv) Srivastava。还检测了铁蛋白、铁和总铁结合能力水平。以高效液相色谱(Hb-HPLC)为金标准。采用Mann - Whitney u检验比较组间连续变量。计算各种指标的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和诊断准确性。P < 0.05差异有统计学意义。结果:Hb-HPLC检出杂合型地中海贫血29例(5.8%),IDA 471例(94.2%)。基于更新的截断值(4.727),Srivastava指数是最佳的筛选工具。结论:红细胞指标可区分孕妇IDA和β地中海贫血,是一种有价值的筛查工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Marine Medical Society
Journal of Marine Medical Society PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
70
审稿时长
40 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信