Trends in management of shoulder instability: Indian perspectives

IF 0.1 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Munish Sood, Vikas Kulshrestha, Santhosh Kumar, Pardeep Kumar, Shalendra Singh, Vidhu Bhatnagar
{"title":"Trends in management of shoulder instability: Indian perspectives","authors":"Munish Sood, Vikas Kulshrestha, Santhosh Kumar, Pardeep Kumar, Shalendra Singh, Vidhu Bhatnagar","doi":"10.4103/jmms.jmms_155_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Shoulder instability is a commonly seen injury in orthopedics practice. The current survey aimed to assess strategies in the management of shoulder instability among orthopedic surgeons in India. Materials and Methods: A survey was created by a group of surgeons who are regularly managing shoulder instability and it was distributed among the various orthopedic surgeons from India. The questionnaire included brief details of surgeons and their experience, clinical assessment, management strategies, and the rehabilitation protocol. We also assess any difference in management strategies of Orthopaedic surgeon (OS group) as compared to fellowship trained sports surgeons/shoulder surgeons (FS group). Results: Ninety-seven orthopedic surgeons participated in the survey. Sixty-four percent were in the age group between 35 and 50 years. Forty-six percent of them were managing these injuries for more than 12 years. 37.5% of surgeons were from government academic institutes. Eighty percent of respondents treat first-time dislocation conservatively. The decision regarding the type of surgery is based on the percentage of bone loss, the number of dislocations, age of the patients as per the majority of respondents. Arthroscopic Bankart’s repair is the most commonly used procedure for anterior shoulder instability. The common criteria for return to sports include a glenohumeral range of motion, rotator strength, functional performance test, type of sports, and ability of the athlete to perform. Conclusion: Bankart’s repair is the most common procedure performed in patients with shoulder instability with minimal bone loss. Computer tomography scan is one of the preferred investigation modalities along with X-ray and magnetic resonance imaging in the first-time dislocation as per FS group. Remplissage in addition to Bankart’s repair is performed by a significantly higher number of participants from FS group as compared to OS group. Levelofevidence: Level V, expert opinion.","PeriodicalId":41773,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Marine Medical Society","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Marine Medical Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmms.jmms_155_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Shoulder instability is a commonly seen injury in orthopedics practice. The current survey aimed to assess strategies in the management of shoulder instability among orthopedic surgeons in India. Materials and Methods: A survey was created by a group of surgeons who are regularly managing shoulder instability and it was distributed among the various orthopedic surgeons from India. The questionnaire included brief details of surgeons and their experience, clinical assessment, management strategies, and the rehabilitation protocol. We also assess any difference in management strategies of Orthopaedic surgeon (OS group) as compared to fellowship trained sports surgeons/shoulder surgeons (FS group). Results: Ninety-seven orthopedic surgeons participated in the survey. Sixty-four percent were in the age group between 35 and 50 years. Forty-six percent of them were managing these injuries for more than 12 years. 37.5% of surgeons were from government academic institutes. Eighty percent of respondents treat first-time dislocation conservatively. The decision regarding the type of surgery is based on the percentage of bone loss, the number of dislocations, age of the patients as per the majority of respondents. Arthroscopic Bankart’s repair is the most commonly used procedure for anterior shoulder instability. The common criteria for return to sports include a glenohumeral range of motion, rotator strength, functional performance test, type of sports, and ability of the athlete to perform. Conclusion: Bankart’s repair is the most common procedure performed in patients with shoulder instability with minimal bone loss. Computer tomography scan is one of the preferred investigation modalities along with X-ray and magnetic resonance imaging in the first-time dislocation as per FS group. Remplissage in addition to Bankart’s repair is performed by a significantly higher number of participants from FS group as compared to OS group. Levelofevidence: Level V, expert opinion.
肩部不稳定的管理趋势:印度的观点
目的:肩部不稳定是骨科实践中常见的损伤。目前的调查旨在评估印度骨科医生肩关节不稳的处理策略。材料和方法:一组定期处理肩部不稳定的外科医生进行了一项调查,并在来自印度的各种骨科医生中进行了分发。问卷包括外科医生及其经验、临床评估、管理策略和康复方案的简要细节。我们还评估了骨科医生(OS组)与接受过奖学金培训的运动外科医生/肩部外科医生(FS组)在管理策略上的差异。结果:97名骨科医生参与了调查。64%的人年龄在35岁到50岁之间。其中46%的人治疗这些伤害超过12年。37.5%的外科医生来自政府学术机构。80%的受访者对首次脱位持保守态度。关于手术类型的决定是基于骨质流失的百分比,脱位的数量,患者的年龄,根据大多数受访者。关节镜下Bankart修复术是治疗肩关节前部不稳定最常用的方法。恢复运动的常见标准包括肩关节活动范围、旋转体力量、功能性能测试、运动类型和运动员的执行能力。结论:Bankart修复术是肩关节失稳且骨质流失最小的患者最常用的手术方法。对于FS组的首次脱位,计算机断层扫描与x线和磁共振成像一起是首选的检查方式之一。与OS组相比,FS组的患者除Bankart修复外,还进行了明显更多的修复。证据等级:V级,专家意见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Marine Medical Society
Journal of Marine Medical Society PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
70
审稿时长
40 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信