Computer Benchmarks: 50 Years Ago and Now

Dana Freiburger
{"title":"Computer Benchmarks: 50 Years Ago and Now","authors":"Dana Freiburger","doi":"10.1145/3632261.3632267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fifty years ago, computer benchmarks were a common practice. In a 1973 article in Computing Surveys, Eric Timmreck, a recent University of Wisconsin-Madison CS Ph.D. graduate working at Shell Research in Houston, Texas, identified three benchmark types to validate a proposed system: Artificial, Standard, and Live benchmarks [1]. He highlighted the latter type in saying, \"There is substantial agreement that the only performance tool which is accurate enough for selection purposes is a well-composed live benchmark.\" Timmreck left it to readers to pick a methodology, including any of six other approaches he cited \"to prove that a system can in fact carry the user's load.\"","PeriodicalId":87449,"journal":{"name":"ONS connect","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ONS connect","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3632261.3632267","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fifty years ago, computer benchmarks were a common practice. In a 1973 article in Computing Surveys, Eric Timmreck, a recent University of Wisconsin-Madison CS Ph.D. graduate working at Shell Research in Houston, Texas, identified three benchmark types to validate a proposed system: Artificial, Standard, and Live benchmarks [1]. He highlighted the latter type in saying, "There is substantial agreement that the only performance tool which is accurate enough for selection purposes is a well-composed live benchmark." Timmreck left it to readers to pick a methodology, including any of six other approaches he cited "to prove that a system can in fact carry the user's load."
计算机基准:50年前和现在
50年前,计算机基准测试是一种常见的做法。在1973年《计算调查》的一篇文章中,Eric Timmreck,最近在德克萨斯州休斯顿的壳牌研究中心工作的威斯康星大学麦迪逊分校计算机科学博士研究生,确定了三种基准类型来验证所提议的系统:人工基准,标准基准和实时基准[1]。他强调了后一种类型,他说:“对于选择目的来说,唯一足够准确的性能工具是一个精心设计的实时基准,这是一个实质性的共识。”Timmreck让读者选择一种方法,包括他引用的其他六种方法中的任何一种,以“证明系统实际上可以承载用户的负载”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信