The Parable of the People's Faith and the Motive of the Crusade Fraternization in F.M. Dostoevsky's Novel "The Idiot".

Aleksandr Borisovich Krinitsyn
{"title":"The Parable of the People's Faith and the Motive of the Crusade Fraternization in F.M. Dostoevsky's Novel \"The Idiot\".","authors":"Aleksandr Borisovich Krinitsyn","doi":"10.25136/2409-8698.2023.10.39061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The author studied the episode of fraternization by Myshkin and Rogozhin in several aspects: 1) as a specific literary transformation of folk’s legends about fraternization with Christ 2) both as the central episode of the novel’s plot and a reference to its final scene 3) ideologically as a spiritual unit between the protagonists and the Russian folk 4) as a symbolic description of internal contradictions of the Russian national character. The episode is closely connected with the preceding talk about belief in God, in whose course Myshkin refusing to directly answer if he believed in God, tells about his meetings with “common people” and arrives at a conclusion about the chaotic and enigmatic depths of the folk’s consciousness. This was the only discourse about religious belief in the whole Dostoevsky’s Pentateuch preceding “the Brothers Karamazov” which makes Myshkin conclude that religious belief can be obtained from Russian folk as a bearer of religious mission, notwithstanding the dark abyss in his soul. The conclusions based on the analysis lets us rethink and reconstruct Myshkin’s ideological evolution in the whole novel. The article traces Dostoevsky’s reliance on folk legends about fraternization with Christ. It is a pioneering research as it points to parallels with the novel’s final in terms of symbolic gestures, paradoxically completing the rite of exchanging crosses in the second chapter of the novel. Myshkin’s thoughts are proved in the next episode when Rogozhin attempts to kill Myshkin – which would have seemed impossible after the characters exchanged their crosses. Thus the imminent catastrophe outlined in the episode dooms the novel’s final, yet not in terms of religious belief and the author’s dependence on Russian folk.","PeriodicalId":31345,"journal":{"name":"Litera","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Litera","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25136/2409-8698.2023.10.39061","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The author studied the episode of fraternization by Myshkin and Rogozhin in several aspects: 1) as a specific literary transformation of folk’s legends about fraternization with Christ 2) both as the central episode of the novel’s plot and a reference to its final scene 3) ideologically as a spiritual unit between the protagonists and the Russian folk 4) as a symbolic description of internal contradictions of the Russian national character. The episode is closely connected with the preceding talk about belief in God, in whose course Myshkin refusing to directly answer if he believed in God, tells about his meetings with “common people” and arrives at a conclusion about the chaotic and enigmatic depths of the folk’s consciousness. This was the only discourse about religious belief in the whole Dostoevsky’s Pentateuch preceding “the Brothers Karamazov” which makes Myshkin conclude that religious belief can be obtained from Russian folk as a bearer of religious mission, notwithstanding the dark abyss in his soul. The conclusions based on the analysis lets us rethink and reconstruct Myshkin’s ideological evolution in the whole novel. The article traces Dostoevsky’s reliance on folk legends about fraternization with Christ. It is a pioneering research as it points to parallels with the novel’s final in terms of symbolic gestures, paradoxically completing the rite of exchanging crosses in the second chapter of the novel. Myshkin’s thoughts are proved in the next episode when Rogozhin attempts to kill Myshkin – which would have seemed impossible after the characters exchanged their crosses. Thus the imminent catastrophe outlined in the episode dooms the novel’s final, yet not in terms of religious belief and the author’s dependence on Russian folk.
陀思妥耶夫斯基小说《白痴》中人民信仰的寓言与兄弟会运动的动机。
作者从以下几个方面对梅什金和罗戈金的亲善情节进行了研究:1)它是对民间与基督亲善传说的具体文学转化;2)它既是小说情节的中心情节,也是小说最后一幕的参考;3)它在意识形态上是主人公与俄罗斯民间之间的精神单元;4)它是对俄罗斯民族性格内部矛盾的象征性描述。这一集与前面关于上帝信仰的讨论密切相关,在这个过程中,梅什金拒绝直接回答他是否相信上帝,他讲述了他与“普通人”的会面,并得出了一个关于民间意识混乱和神秘深处的结论。这是陀思妥耶夫斯基在《卡拉马佐夫兄弟》之前的整个《五经》中唯一关于宗教信仰的论述,这使得梅什金得出结论,宗教信仰可以从俄罗斯民间获得,作为宗教使命的承载者,尽管他的灵魂中有黑暗的深渊。在分析的基础上得出结论,让我们重新思考和重构梅什金在整部小说中的思想演变。这篇文章追溯了陀思妥耶夫斯基对与基督亲善的民间传说的依赖。这是一项开创性的研究,因为它指出了与小说结尾在象征性姿态方面的相似之处,矛盾地完成了小说第二章中交换十字架的仪式。梅什金的想法在下一集得到了证实,罗戈津试图杀死梅什金——在角色交换了十字架之后,这似乎是不可能的。因此,这一集所描绘的迫在眉睫的灾难注定了小说的结局,但这与宗教信仰和作者对俄罗斯民间的依赖无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书