Purposes and patterns of the use of antique sources in old English religious texts by Ælfric and Wulfstan

Ekaterina Sergeevna Grishakova, Mariia Igorevna Balykina
{"title":"Purposes and patterns of the use of antique sources in old English religious texts by Ælfric and Wulfstan","authors":"Ekaterina Sergeevna Grishakova, Mariia Igorevna Balykina","doi":"10.25136/2409-8698.2023.10.68791","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article contains the results of the analysis of existing investigations into the ways how Latin religious sources were adopted and adapted in Anglo-Saxon homiletic literature. The present analysis may be of value when it is important to understand how religious contexts were borrowed and presented to a different culture, moreover the motives of adaptation of Latin texts may add to better understanding of the writer’s personalities and thus to a clearer insight into their works. Two eminent old English writers: Aelfric and Wulfstan worked closely with Latin texts following various strategies. While Aelfric in most cases translated the texts verbatim or slightly modified them, Wulfstan put much effort to give the text his own personality. Both writers still depended on the rhetoric traditions employed in Latin and their individual styles coincide in with usage of some stylistic features such as assonance, alliteration and repetition, but still were rather different. Aelfric himself considered the translation to be a separate rhetoric device as the text converted into a different language does not only carry the message to the target audience, but makes the process of communication easier. For Wulfstan the message itself is of importance, not the source, so he elaborated his unique style of communicating his ideas to the target audience. The practical and scientific value of the article is expressed in the need to structure the existing studies of the influence of the Latin language on Old English and opens up the perspective of further study in the field of rhetoric and pragmalinguistics.","PeriodicalId":31345,"journal":{"name":"Litera","volume":"297 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Litera","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25136/2409-8698.2023.10.68791","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article contains the results of the analysis of existing investigations into the ways how Latin religious sources were adopted and adapted in Anglo-Saxon homiletic literature. The present analysis may be of value when it is important to understand how religious contexts were borrowed and presented to a different culture, moreover the motives of adaptation of Latin texts may add to better understanding of the writer’s personalities and thus to a clearer insight into their works. Two eminent old English writers: Aelfric and Wulfstan worked closely with Latin texts following various strategies. While Aelfric in most cases translated the texts verbatim or slightly modified them, Wulfstan put much effort to give the text his own personality. Both writers still depended on the rhetoric traditions employed in Latin and their individual styles coincide in with usage of some stylistic features such as assonance, alliteration and repetition, but still were rather different. Aelfric himself considered the translation to be a separate rhetoric device as the text converted into a different language does not only carry the message to the target audience, but makes the process of communication easier. For Wulfstan the message itself is of importance, not the source, so he elaborated his unique style of communicating his ideas to the target audience. The practical and scientific value of the article is expressed in the need to structure the existing studies of the influence of the Latin language on Old English and opens up the perspective of further study in the field of rhetoric and pragmalinguistics.
lfric和Wulfstan在古英语宗教文本中使用古董来源的目的和模式
这篇文章包含了对盎格鲁-撒克逊说教文学如何采用和改编拉丁宗教来源的现有调查分析的结果。当前的分析可能是有价值的,当它是重要的,以了解宗教背景是如何借鉴和呈现给不同的文化,此外,拉丁文本的改编动机可能有助于更好地了解作家的个性,从而更清楚地了解他们的作品。两位著名的古代英国作家:埃尔弗里克和伍尔夫斯坦,遵循各种策略与拉丁文本密切合作。虽然埃尔弗里克在大多数情况下逐字翻译文本或稍微修改它们,但沃尔夫斯坦花了很多精力赋予文本自己的个性。两位作家仍然依赖于拉丁语的修辞传统,他们的个人风格与一些风格特征的使用一致,如辅音、头韵和重复,但仍然有很大的不同。埃尔弗里克本人认为翻译是一种单独的修辞手段,因为将文本转换成另一种语言不仅可以将信息传递给目标受众,而且可以使交流过程更容易。对于伍尔夫斯坦来说,重要的是信息本身,而不是信息的来源,所以他阐述了自己独特的风格,向目标受众传达自己的想法。本文的实用价值和科学价值体现在需要对现有的拉丁语对古英语影响的研究进行梳理,并为修辞学和语用语言学领域的进一步研究开辟了前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书