A prioritized decision making method for reliability allocation: In optimistic and pessimistic view

IF 0.4 Q4 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Aniruddha Samanta, Kajla Basu
{"title":"A prioritized decision making method for reliability allocation: In optimistic and pessimistic view","authors":"Aniruddha Samanta, Kajla Basu","doi":"10.3233/jid-200013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reliability allocation is a very important problem during early design and development phases of a system. There are several reliability allocation techniques which are used to achieve the target reliability. The feasibility of objectives (FOO) technique is one of them that is widely used to perform system reliability allocation. But this technique has two fundamental shortcomings. The first is the measurement scale and the second is that it does not consider the order weight of the reliability allocation factors. The prioritization of the factors is also an important topic in decision making. Practically, all factors in multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) are not in the same priority level. Hence, in decision making situation, it is usual for decision makers to consider different priority factors. So, considering the prioritization of the factors, a reliability allocation method is proposed here to overcome the shortcomings of the FOO technique. Also, a case study on reliability allocation in airborne radar system is considered here to verify the efficiency of the proposed approach. Finally, the results are calculated in different optimistic and pessimistic view point and compared with the FOO technique. This comparison exhibits the advantages and supremacy of the proposed approach.","PeriodicalId":43457,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Integrated Design & Process Science","volume":"119 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Integrated Design & Process Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/jid-200013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reliability allocation is a very important problem during early design and development phases of a system. There are several reliability allocation techniques which are used to achieve the target reliability. The feasibility of objectives (FOO) technique is one of them that is widely used to perform system reliability allocation. But this technique has two fundamental shortcomings. The first is the measurement scale and the second is that it does not consider the order weight of the reliability allocation factors. The prioritization of the factors is also an important topic in decision making. Practically, all factors in multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) are not in the same priority level. Hence, in decision making situation, it is usual for decision makers to consider different priority factors. So, considering the prioritization of the factors, a reliability allocation method is proposed here to overcome the shortcomings of the FOO technique. Also, a case study on reliability allocation in airborne radar system is considered here to verify the efficiency of the proposed approach. Finally, the results are calculated in different optimistic and pessimistic view point and compared with the FOO technique. This comparison exhibits the advantages and supremacy of the proposed approach.
一种可靠性分配的优先决策方法:乐观与悲观观点
在系统的早期设计和开发阶段,可靠性分配是一个非常重要的问题。为了实现目标可靠性,有几种可靠性分配技术。目标可行性(FOO)技术是其中一种广泛应用于系统可靠性分配的方法。但是这种技术有两个根本的缺点。一是测量尺度,二是未考虑可靠性分配因子的序权。各因素的优先排序也是决策中的一个重要课题。实际上,在多准则决策(MCDM)中,各因素的优先级并不相同。因此,在决策情境中,决策者通常会考虑不同的优先因素。因此,考虑到各因素的优先级,本文提出了一种可靠性分配方法来克服FOO技术的不足。最后,以机载雷达系统的可靠性分配为例,验证了该方法的有效性。最后,从不同的乐观和悲观角度对结果进行了计算,并与FOO技术进行了比较。这个比较显示了所提出的方法的优点和优越性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Integrated Design & Process Science
Journal of Integrated Design & Process Science ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: The notions of design and process cut across many disciplines. Applications of abstract notions of design and process to engineering problem solving would certainly redefine and expand the notion of engineering itself in the 21st century. This Journal of SDPS strives to be the repository of human knowledge covering interdisciplinary notions of design and process in a rigorous fashion. We expect and encourage papers crossing the boundaries back and forth in mathematical landscape as well as among mathematics, physics, economics, management science, and engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信