Differentiating diffuse cystic lung disease and emphysema cases from normal using Artificial Intelligence

IF 0.7 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Katie Noonan, Ronan Hearne, Brian Gaffney, Brian Sheehy, Niall Mcveigh, Yasuhito Sekimoto, Ali Ataya, Nishant Gupta, Francis Mccormack, Raphaël Borie, Francesco Bonella, David Murphy, Kathleen Curran, Cormac Mccarthy
{"title":"Differentiating diffuse cystic lung disease and emphysema cases from normal using Artificial Intelligence","authors":"Katie Noonan, Ronan Hearne, Brian Gaffney, Brian Sheehy, Niall Mcveigh, Yasuhito Sekimoto, Ali Ataya, Nishant Gupta, Francis Mccormack, Raphaël Borie, Francesco Bonella, David Murphy, Kathleen Curran, Cormac Mccarthy","doi":"10.1183/13993003.congress-2023.pa2292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<b>Introduction:</b> Diffuse Cystic Lung Disease (DCLD) share a common phenotype of multiple thin-walled pulmonary cysts. Their relative scarcity and visual similarity to more prevalent diseases like emphysema, gives rise to frequent misdiagnosis, leading to dramatically worse clinical outcomes and a higher burden on the healthcare system. <b>Aims and Objectives:</b> To stratify DCLD and Emphysema from those with no disease (Normal) using Artificial Intelligence (AI) techniques applied to CT images. <b>Methods:</b> Deep learning models to stratify DCLD and Emphysema patients from normal patients were employed in two studies. The first study isolated the lungs and trained three CNN classifiers (DenseNet201, ResNet50, and Xception) for comparison. The second study trained a ResNet50 model with a Convolutional Block Attention Module to assess potential benefits of using attention components. Explainability was explored using GradCam. <b>Results:</b> The first study used 118 DCLD and control cases, and the second study used 20 DCLD, emphysema and control cases. These datasets yielded 17,460 and 5,312 CT slices respectively. Train and test datasets were created with a 90/10 and 75/25 split respectively. Validation sets were derived from training data during training. Care was taken to ensure that there was no patient overlap between training, validation and testing datasets. AUCs above 0.97 and 0.921, and Average PR above 0.95 and 0.93 were observed across the two studies respectively. <b>Conclusions:</b> The high specificity and AUC scores achieved by the models supports its use case as a decision support tool for radiologists in the analysis of Emphysema and DCLD cases.","PeriodicalId":34850,"journal":{"name":"Imaging","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2023.pa2292","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Diffuse Cystic Lung Disease (DCLD) share a common phenotype of multiple thin-walled pulmonary cysts. Their relative scarcity and visual similarity to more prevalent diseases like emphysema, gives rise to frequent misdiagnosis, leading to dramatically worse clinical outcomes and a higher burden on the healthcare system. Aims and Objectives: To stratify DCLD and Emphysema from those with no disease (Normal) using Artificial Intelligence (AI) techniques applied to CT images. Methods: Deep learning models to stratify DCLD and Emphysema patients from normal patients were employed in two studies. The first study isolated the lungs and trained three CNN classifiers (DenseNet201, ResNet50, and Xception) for comparison. The second study trained a ResNet50 model with a Convolutional Block Attention Module to assess potential benefits of using attention components. Explainability was explored using GradCam. Results: The first study used 118 DCLD and control cases, and the second study used 20 DCLD, emphysema and control cases. These datasets yielded 17,460 and 5,312 CT slices respectively. Train and test datasets were created with a 90/10 and 75/25 split respectively. Validation sets were derived from training data during training. Care was taken to ensure that there was no patient overlap between training, validation and testing datasets. AUCs above 0.97 and 0.921, and Average PR above 0.95 and 0.93 were observed across the two studies respectively. Conclusions: The high specificity and AUC scores achieved by the models supports its use case as a decision support tool for radiologists in the analysis of Emphysema and DCLD cases.
应用人工智能鉴别弥漫性囊性肺疾病与肺气肿
弥漫性囊性肺疾病(DCLD)具有多个薄壁肺囊肿的共同表型。它们的相对稀缺性和视觉上与肺气肿等更流行的疾病相似,导致频繁误诊,导致临床结果严重恶化,并给医疗保健系统带来更大的负担。目的:应用CT图像人工智能(AI)技术对无疾病(正常)的dcd和肺气肿进行分层。方法:两项研究采用深度学习模型对DCLD和肺气肿患者进行分层。第一项研究分离了肺部并训练了三个CNN分类器(DenseNet201, ResNet50和Xception)进行比较。第二项研究训练了一个带有卷积块注意力模块的ResNet50模型,以评估使用注意力组件的潜在好处。使用GradCam探索可解释性。结果:第一项研究118例DCLD及对照,第二项研究20例DCLD及肺气肿及对照。这些数据集分别产生了17,460和5,312个CT切片。训练和测试数据集分别以90/10和75/25分割创建。验证集由训练期间的训练数据导出。注意确保训练、验证和测试数据集之间没有患者重叠。两项研究的auc分别大于0.97和0.921,平均PR大于0.95和0.93。结论:该模型的高特异性和AUC评分支持其作为放射科医生在分析肺气肿和DCLD病例时的决策支持工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Imaging
Imaging MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
25.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信