Solidarity and the Crisis of Values in the European Union

Xavier Groussot, Eleni Karaeorgiou
{"title":"Solidarity and the Crisis of Values in the European Union","authors":"Xavier Groussot, Eleni Karaeorgiou","doi":"10.36969/njel.v6i2.25410","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Looking at Article 2 TEU, this contribution considers that there is an external and an internal crisis of values: the former referring to challenges to EU values coming from individual Member States which prioritize their own agendas and the latter referring to the tension between a liberal and more solidarity-driven understanding of the EU’s foundations as it stems from the very wording of Article 2 TEU. In an attempt to unpack solidarity and offer a better understanding of its nature, scope and legal implications for the EU and its Member States, this contribution proceeds as follows: first, it studies solidarity within a specific methodological and theoretical framework based on a ‘structured network of EU principles’ established by the CJEU in the post-Lisbon era. Second, it operates under the assumption that a holistic understanding of EU solidarity requires us to go beyond the dominant form of solidarity based on the relationship between Member States (‘interstate solidarity’) and to explore the relationships between individuals (‘interpersonal solidarity’). Our key argument is that a larger institutional recognition of ‘interpersonal solidarity’ has the potential to put the social question more squarely on the table and, as such, to enable the EU to better address the polycrisis it is facing. A ‘Scellian approach’ to EU solidarity - which places the person at the heart of the theoretical framework and as the real subject of solidarity is useful to adopt as a source of inspiration in such an endeavour.","PeriodicalId":489206,"journal":{"name":"Nordic journal of european law","volume":"183 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordic journal of european law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36969/njel.v6i2.25410","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Looking at Article 2 TEU, this contribution considers that there is an external and an internal crisis of values: the former referring to challenges to EU values coming from individual Member States which prioritize their own agendas and the latter referring to the tension between a liberal and more solidarity-driven understanding of the EU’s foundations as it stems from the very wording of Article 2 TEU. In an attempt to unpack solidarity and offer a better understanding of its nature, scope and legal implications for the EU and its Member States, this contribution proceeds as follows: first, it studies solidarity within a specific methodological and theoretical framework based on a ‘structured network of EU principles’ established by the CJEU in the post-Lisbon era. Second, it operates under the assumption that a holistic understanding of EU solidarity requires us to go beyond the dominant form of solidarity based on the relationship between Member States (‘interstate solidarity’) and to explore the relationships between individuals (‘interpersonal solidarity’). Our key argument is that a larger institutional recognition of ‘interpersonal solidarity’ has the potential to put the social question more squarely on the table and, as such, to enable the EU to better address the polycrisis it is facing. A ‘Scellian approach’ to EU solidarity - which places the person at the heart of the theoretical framework and as the real subject of solidarity is useful to adopt as a source of inspiration in such an endeavour.
欧盟的团结与价值观危机
看看第2条TEU,这篇文章认为存在外部和内部价值观危机:前者指的是对欧盟价值观的挑战,这些价值观来自于优先考虑自己议程的个别成员国,后者指的是自由主义和更团结驱动的对欧盟基础的理解之间的紧张关系,因为它源于第2条TEU的措辞。在试图解开团结,并提供一个更好的理解其性质,范围和对欧盟及其成员国的法律影响,这一贡献如下:首先,它研究团结在一个特定的方法和理论框架内,基于一个“结构化的欧盟原则网络”由欧洲法院建立后里斯本时代。其次,它是在一个假设下运作的,即对欧盟团结的整体理解要求我们超越基于成员国之间关系(“国家间团结”)的主要团结形式,并探索个人之间的关系(“人际团结”)。我们的主要论点是,更大的机构对“人际团结”的认可有可能将社会问题更直接地摆在桌面上,因此,使欧盟能够更好地解决它所面临的多重危机。欧盟团结的“Scellian方法”——将人置于理论框架的核心,并作为团结的真正主体——在这种努力中作为灵感的来源是有用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信