Climate Change Litigation – A Promising Perspective?

Q4 Social Sciences
Thomas Kreuder
{"title":"Climate Change Litigation – A Promising Perspective?","authors":"Thomas Kreuder","doi":"10.3935/zpfz.73.23.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Like climate change, climate lawsuits are a global phenomenon. Under the guise of “strategic litigation”, individuals and groups try to advance sufficient efforts to mitigate climate change by states and companies, citing constitutional fundamental and human rights. The majority of the litigation has so far been unsuccessful. With the Dutch judgments in the Urgenda and Shell cases and the decision of the German Federal Constitutional Court of March 2021, case-law precedent for concrete measures has recently become available. The article sheds light on the discussion on climate lawsuits, lets critics have their say and concludes with an outlook on the effects of these proceedings on liberal parliamentary democracies and the emergence of global ecological human rights and possibly even of nature’s rights for its own sake.","PeriodicalId":34908,"journal":{"name":"Zbornik Pravnog Fakulteta u Zagrebu","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zbornik Pravnog Fakulteta u Zagrebu","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3935/zpfz.73.23.16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Like climate change, climate lawsuits are a global phenomenon. Under the guise of “strategic litigation”, individuals and groups try to advance sufficient efforts to mitigate climate change by states and companies, citing constitutional fundamental and human rights. The majority of the litigation has so far been unsuccessful. With the Dutch judgments in the Urgenda and Shell cases and the decision of the German Federal Constitutional Court of March 2021, case-law precedent for concrete measures has recently become available. The article sheds light on the discussion on climate lawsuits, lets critics have their say and concludes with an outlook on the effects of these proceedings on liberal parliamentary democracies and the emergence of global ecological human rights and possibly even of nature’s rights for its own sake.
气候变化诉讼-一个有希望的前景?
与气候变化一样,气候诉讼也是一种全球现象。在“战略诉讼”的幌子下,个人和团体试图以宪法基本权利和人权为由,推动国家和企业为减缓气候变化做出充分努力。到目前为止,大多数诉讼都没有成功。随着荷兰对Urgenda和壳牌案件的判决以及德国联邦宪法法院2021年3月的决定,最近有了具体措施的判例法先例。这篇文章揭示了气候诉讼的讨论,让批评者有了发言权,并展望了这些诉讼对自由议会民主的影响,以及全球生态人权的出现,甚至可能是为了自然的权利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信