Computational thinking: Visible in the classroom but invisible in the curriculum

Helena Isaksson Persson
{"title":"Computational thinking: Visible in the classroom but invisible in the curriculum","authors":"Helena Isaksson Persson","doi":"10.15663/ajte.v9.i0.107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In our technology-intensive world, computing and programmed technological solutions have gained in importance, and their influence on curriculum, teaching, and learning has been substantial worldwide. Sweden, along with many countries, has integrated programming into the compulsory school curriculum as an integrated part of the teaching of Mathematics and Technology. In addition to a focus on programming, the new curricula also place significant emphasis on digital skills and on enhancing awareness of how the digitalisation of society affects us. Programming is described as a digital competence and computational thinking (CT) as important knowledge through which to facilitate learning and understanding of programming. Thus, it seems that CT, as seen in the Swedishcontext, should relate to both programming and digital competence. In this article, the aim is to examine the presence of CT in Swedish research literature and as a part of the discourse around the development of the Swedish curriculum. A content analysis of the curriculum and a thematic analysis of research publications show that CT is not well integrated into Sweden’s educational system. However, CTrelated activities are found in several subjects and research about CT, and programming is thriving. Requirements for the design of complex systems where understandings of humans and technology are equally important put new demands on education. Meeting these demands in education can be a challenge, but one subject in the Swedish curriculum seems to be suitable for the task, the technology subject. We conclude that the subject technology should be revised to include a greater focus on creativity regarding CT and the construction of computational technological artefacts.","PeriodicalId":170728,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Technology Education","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal of Technology Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15663/ajte.v9.i0.107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In our technology-intensive world, computing and programmed technological solutions have gained in importance, and their influence on curriculum, teaching, and learning has been substantial worldwide. Sweden, along with many countries, has integrated programming into the compulsory school curriculum as an integrated part of the teaching of Mathematics and Technology. In addition to a focus on programming, the new curricula also place significant emphasis on digital skills and on enhancing awareness of how the digitalisation of society affects us. Programming is described as a digital competence and computational thinking (CT) as important knowledge through which to facilitate learning and understanding of programming. Thus, it seems that CT, as seen in the Swedishcontext, should relate to both programming and digital competence. In this article, the aim is to examine the presence of CT in Swedish research literature and as a part of the discourse around the development of the Swedish curriculum. A content analysis of the curriculum and a thematic analysis of research publications show that CT is not well integrated into Sweden’s educational system. However, CTrelated activities are found in several subjects and research about CT, and programming is thriving. Requirements for the design of complex systems where understandings of humans and technology are equally important put new demands on education. Meeting these demands in education can be a challenge, but one subject in the Swedish curriculum seems to be suitable for the task, the technology subject. We conclude that the subject technology should be revised to include a greater focus on creativity regarding CT and the construction of computational technological artefacts.
计算思维:在课堂上可见,但在课程中不可见
在我们这个技术密集型的世界里,计算和编程技术解决方案已经变得越来越重要,它们对课程、教学和学习的影响在世界范围内都是巨大的。瑞典同许多国家一样,已将编程作为数学和技术教学的一个组成部分纳入义务学校课程。除了注重编程,新课程还非常强调数字技能,以及提高人们对社会数字化如何影响我们的认识。编程被描述为一种数字能力,而计算思维(CT)是一种重要的知识,通过它可以促进编程的学习和理解。因此,在瑞典语境中,CT似乎与编程和数字能力都有关系。在这篇文章中,目的是检查CT在瑞典研究文献中的存在,并作为瑞典课程发展话语的一部分。课程的内容分析和研究出版物的专题分析表明,CT没有很好地融入瑞典的教育体系。然而,在一些关于CT的学科和研究中发现了与CT相关的活动,编程正在蓬勃发展。复杂系统的设计要求对人类和技术的理解同样重要,这对教育提出了新的要求。在教育中满足这些要求可能是一项挑战,但瑞典课程中的一门学科似乎适合这项任务,那就是技术学科。我们的结论是,主题技术应该进行修订,以包括更多的关注创造力关于CT和计算技术人工制品的构建。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信